Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so few?

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby dorlomin » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 16:26:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Madpaddy', 'S')nowrunner,

I am European and I think my comments hold true for most countries here except of course for the French who are always revolting... in the political sense of course.
For all there flaws, the French remain engaged in the political process. When it comes to being pissed off with the political class they are prepaired to walk the walk and not just talk the talk.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Carlhole » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 16:59:36

Image

Vote No Bailout

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Vote No Bailout', 'D')emand that the Bailout Legislation Be Rejected

We are witnessing a bankers' coup d’etat. In the name of saving the economy from a crisis created by their own greed and immense profits, the biggest bankers have taken a country and a people hostage.

“Give us your money and tear up what’s left of your Constitution or we will sink your economy,” is the message from Wall Street and the Bush Administration. “Give us the power and money we demand or you will be left jobless from a new economic depression."

Under the pretext of the banking crisis, the Bush Administration is changing the way this country operates. This is not simply taking trillions of dollars from the people and giving it to the richest bankers to do with as they see fit.

Click here to send your letter to Congress

Congress is poised to vote to give the Executive Branch of government, and specifically the White House’s political appointees in the Treasury Department, the absolute right to take our money and give it to domestic and foreign banks and corporations without any oversight of elected officials, from the courts, or from the people.

The new legislation states: “Decisions by the Secretary [of the Treasury] pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.” The Legislation allows the Treasury Department to appoint the same bankers who created the crisis to administer and dictate the use of trillions of our tax dollars.

We will not stand by and let the Bush Administration formalize its vision of a “government of, by and for the richest bankers."

The new system institutionalizes theft on a grand scale. Lehman Brothers bankers will receive $2.5 billion in bonuses after their company went bankrupt last week, but the new dictatorial authority under the White House and Treasury Department has ruled out any relief for the millions of working families who are being foreclosed.

We live in a $15 trillion annual economy. Instead of taking our tax dollars and giving it to the already rich and powerful, these funds should be used provide to decent paying jobs, affordable housing, health care and a good education for our children. There is another way!

Now is the time to hear the voice of the people. A spineless Congress authorized Bush’s illegal war in Iraq and rubber-stamped the Patriot Act. Now they are being herded like sheep again to give the White House and Wall Street dictatorial control over the people’s money.

Send a letter to Your Congressional Representatives Below!

1. Complete the form below with your information.
2. Personalize the subject and text of the message on the right with your own words, if you wish. We have provided sample language for your letter to Congress. You are free to make modifications as you choose. You may wish to consider explaining why you believe the bailout should be rejected.
3. Click the Next Step button to send your letter to these decision makers: ...


I'll be the first to admit that I don't really understand the situation in detail and I don't know what course of action is best. But the whole tone of the bailout as proposed by Henry Paulson seems ominous. Definitely unconstitutional.

I kind of agree with the people who are saying that the taxpayers should take a direct stake in the affected companies - rather than buying the inventory of securities held by all these firms ( a big unknown).

Seems like plenty of voices are making themselves heard on this issue today and hopefully we will all be able to read some more insightful analysis of the situation we face soon.
Carlhole
 

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 17:54:35

True revolutions are never planned or organized. They happen when the hunger gets too great and there is no food to be had, when people start watching family members die.

Both the French and Russian Revolutions started that way.

It is only afterwards that groups step forward to lay claim and try to grab the reigns of power.

I believe the pain in the US is about to become great. When people start starving and freezing to death in great numbers, the revolution will be spontaneous, and carried out by those people who are sheeple right now. Their ignorance and inability to reason will feed their anger and sense of betrayal. These are the ones the elites need to fear.
Last edited by Cid_Yama on Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:23:37, edited 1 time in total.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:14:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'F')or all there flaws, the French remain engaged in the political process. When it comes to being pissed off with the political class they are prepaired to walk the walk and not just talk the talk.


Like burning cars? How productive.
mos6507
 

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby dorlomin » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:25:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cid_Yama', 'T')rue revolutions are never planned or organized. They happen when the hunger gets too great and there is no food to be had, whe people start watching family members die.

Both the French and Russian Revolutions started that way.
Well I am sure the Irish on the forum would be quick to point out that the 1916 uprising was carefully planned and the subsiquent actions from 1919 to 1922 were the act of deliberate provocation of the British onto the Irish to inspire an general uprising. But well pretend that one did not happen.

And of course the South African ANC's steady long running struggle to deliberatetly provoke the government to attack the people and help encourage support for the liberation struggle also can be discounted......

Basicaly youve written a trite, easily disputed, ahistorical sound bite.
Last edited by dorlomin on Mon 22 Sep 2008, 19:25:55, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby dorlomin » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:28:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'F')or all there flaws, the French remain engaged in the political process. When it comes to being pissed off with the political class they are prepaired to walk the walk and not just talk the talk.


Like burning cars? How productive.
Blocking motorways, burning British beef, blocking ports..... it has actualy moved government policy on several occasions. It may not have had a beneficial impact on the long term French economy but its been a damn site more effective in moving government action than bitching on an internet forum.
User avatar
dorlomin
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby shady28 » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:38:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', '
')Like burning cars? How productive.
Blocking motorways, burning British beef, blocking ports..... it has actualy moved government policy on several occasions. It may not have had a beneficial impact on the long term French economy but its been a damn site more effective in moving government action than bitching on an internet forum.[/quote]

History says Dorlomin is right. Think civil rights movement, think suffrage, think bloody union strikes in the 20s and 30s. Those things shaped the world.

And here's a really good one, the Bonus army of WW I in 1932 :

"On the 28th of July 1932, Attorney General Mitchell ordered the police evacuation of the Bonus Army veterans, who resisted; the police shot at them, and killed two. When told of the killings, President Hoover ordered the U.S. Army to effect the evacuation of the Bonus Army from Washington, D.C.

At 4:45 p.m., commanded by Gen. Douglas MacArthur, the 12th Infantry Regiment, Fort Howard, Maryland, and the 3rd Cavalry Regiment, supported with six battle tanks commanded by Maj. George S. Patton, Fort Myer, Virginia, formed in Pennsylvania Avenue while thousands of Civil Service employees left work to line the street and watch the U.S. Army attack its own veterans. The Bonus Marchers, believing the display was in their honour, cheered the troops until Maj. Patton charged the cavalry against them — to which action the Civil Service employee spectators yelled: "Shame! Shame!" against the charging cavalry.

After the cavalry charge, infantry, with fixed bayonets and adamsite gas, entered the Bonus Army camps, evicting veterans, families, and camp followers. The veterans fled across the Anacostia River, to their largest camp; President Hoover ordered the Army assault stopped, however, Gen. MacArthur—feeling this free-speech exercise was a Communist attempt at overthrowing the U.S. Government—ignored the President and re-attacked. Hundreds of veterans were injured, several were killed — including William Hushka and Eric Carlson; a veteran's wife miscarried; and many other veterans were hurt. The sight of armed U.S. Army soldiers attacking poor American veterans of the recent Great War later prompted formal veteran relief funds, and, eventually, establishment of the Veterans Administration. (Bonus Army encamped in 1932; Veterans Administration had already been established in 1930. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_A ... on#History) As member of Gen. MacArthur's staff, Maj. Dwight D. Eisenhower had strong reservations about routing the anti-Bonus Army."
Welcome to the Kondratieff Winter
User avatar
shady28
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed 06 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby alokin » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 18:57:24

Alex, you said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here is no conspiracy to keep the public dumb. For the average citizen in "any" country......ignorance is bliss!!!


but this is only partly right. I lived in Europe for nearly my entire live. I grew up and nearly every house around us had its daily newspaper, everyone watched news on TV, political discussions were normal and since I was 16 I went to demonstrations on a regular basis.
(In Germany we didn't have only Nazis we had Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht, Clara Zetkin amongst others).

Then we moved to Australia. And I found no decent newspaper for a city of more than one Million. TV news are crab, the only interesting news they bring at 10:30. As a result most of the people are just uninformed. They don't think positive about the pollies, I hear comments like "they just don't get it", "leave them alone".
As a result I read only in internet, and these news are mostly international, hence I know little about Australian politics. The sites of Australian newspapers are simply no fun to read you must search information between "robbery at Queens park", "Kyle got married", Broncos whatever then maybe perhaps you find something that the world economy might have problems.

Good newspapers and TV has a lot of influence on people. It must be newspapers that try to write in a language people understand and which is good to read (other than the he said she said journalism),

Still America is a free country (not really). You are allowed to educate the dummies, you are allowed to make radio, and provided you find the money you might start a TV show or a newspaper or cheaper and internet site.
User avatar
alokin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri 24 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 19:08:04

Dolormin,

Both of your examples are not true revolutions, just like coups are not true revolutions. Those are merely power struggles between factions, bringing change within a system or putting new faces at the top of the same structure.

A true revolution is where a new paradigm is formed from the ashes of a previous system. This requires a total collapse of the previous system.

(Not to denigrate the starry plough. Movements and uprisings, such as this, as well as the labor struggles in the US in the 1930's, are necessary to bring about change <b>within</b> a system.)
Last edited by Cid_Yama on Mon 22 Sep 2008, 20:12:59, edited 3 times in total.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby AgentR » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 20:07:37

We simply have too much food here, and our climate is basically moderate. There will be no starvation and no more than the usual suspects freezing; thus there will be no revolution.

Its cheaper to feed the proletariat than it is to fight them; and fed, they're about as problematic as a tuna stuffed house cat.

Our new Lords understand the situation just fine. The processed gue will continue to flow.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 20:16:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dorlomin', 'B')locking motorways, burning British beef, blocking ports..... it has actualy moved government policy on several occasions. It may not have had a beneficial impact on the long term French economy but its been a damn site more effective in moving government action than bitching on an internet forum.


Let's hand it to vandalism, folks!
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Maddog78 » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 20:28:45

People, don't you know the NFL is back on again?

Wal Mart shoppers are much more interested in who will Monday Night football than a financial melt down!
User avatar
Maddog78
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1626
Joined: Mon 14 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Denny » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 21:01:27

It seems the rest of the world sees the financial "upward gush" (opposite of the now defunct trickle down theory) more clearly than the American public. And, I'll say "American" in the broader context of including Canada too.

When the Great Depression hit, it took many years for American labor to mobilize, organize and then strike. I am sure many in 1929 and 1930 tried to come to terms with what they were told, and only as the feel good tripe was disproven and the bread lines grew, did the public latch on to collective action and become more politicized.

It was the 1950's, that era which so many people, especially conservatives, see in nostalgic terms, that the income disparity was greatly reduced in America, as workers incomes grew in real terms. Also a time when progressive income taxation was so much harsher on the affluent than today, as the political process drove a greater sense of social equality.

I can say that in my grandfather's and my father's eras, the regular working person took a much deeper interest in politics than my generation and now, the next generation seems apathetic. Like docile lambs ready for a harvest.
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 22:13:25

What a quote at the end! 8O

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')here, oh where, is America's Vladimir Putin, who will drive out the oligarchs who have stolen the country's treasure and debased its currency?


Never heard Putin referred to in this way before.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby alokin » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 23:24:35

well, they might have problems stuffing the cat in future...
User avatar
alokin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri 24 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Captain_Meh » Mon 22 Sep 2008, 23:24:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AlexdeLarge', 'T')he average person does not pay attention until it impacts their life directly. Just like a bunch of sheep. The only design in this may be genetic..........but not a conspiracy.


IMO, its neither genetic or the product of a conspiracy. Its the Division of Labor taken to its absurd and possibly natural end. By and large, our modern society has enabled the individual to withdraw from the community setting so that isolation, in almost every sense, is the logical consequence. Call it trickle-down living; the problem is that sh!t rolls downhill too.
User avatar
Captain_Meh
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Why are the voices raised in protest so shrill and so fe

Unread postby Daphne64 » Tue 23 Sep 2008, 00:16:20

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1222092 ... ts_news_us

the money quote:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')r. Paulson has argued that pay limits shouldn't be part of this plan because they could discourage firms from participating. Treasury is also arguing that it isn't feasible to expect thousands of companies to change their executive compensation structure just to participate in the program and says such a move would discourage small banks and credit unions from participating. Some lawmakers are looking to call Mr. Paulson's bluff, thinking that many institutions would find the choice between limits on executive pay and bankruptcy an easy one. But Treasury is insisting that is a false choice and that the program isn't aimed at preventing firms from filing for bankruptcy but is instead supposed to help relieve pressure on firms that are being weighed down by a glut of assets they can't sell.
Daphne64
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: middle of the USA
Top

Previous

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron