by Carlhole » Fri 19 Sep 2008, 12:53:08
Rapture of the Nerds, Not
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Steven Smithy', 'I') can take a joke, even a boring old joke that implies I’m a robot cultist, but it irks me when jokes become a substitute for thinking. There’s always someone in discussions on the topic who uses the comparison to fringe Christian beliefs about the End Days as if it’s some sort of argument, a reason why all the developments postulated by those who do take the singularity seriously will fail to materialize...
...Now, it could be that if there’s a close similarity between the singularity and the rapture, this points at some sort of psychological flaw shared by believers in both, a seductive but irrational attractor of the human mind that sucks people in, with those raised religiously dressing it up in terms of God, and us technologically-oriented atheists imagining a human-made God-substitute. But that image of a shared psychological flaw is itself so seductive that it has distorted people’s view of what the singularity is about into a kind of geek-bible-wielding strawman — singularitarian ideas are assumed to parallel fundamentalist Christian ideas even where they don’t, just because the comparison is apparently so much fun. “Oh, look at those silly nerds, aping the awful fundies without even knowing it!” In this post, I will list some (but not all) ways in which the singularity and rapture resemble each other less than some people think.
I really like KMO's show.
Informed authors on the subjects of Peak Oil (pro/con), The Technological Singularity (pro/con), and the subject of Earth Consciousness/Shamanism (pro/con) are brought on each week to elaborate on their ideas. You get a more in-depth presentation from each person on his/her ideas and you get a balanced treatment of these subjects - the blend of which which creates a very interesting mix indeed.
In Episode 120 with John Michael Greer, there had been some "singularity bashing" so KMO read the above article written by someone who would not have completely agreed with Greer.
It's interesting to point out that Greer himself would not completely agree with the Peak Oil Doom Cult which asserts itself at the fall of a feather here on PO.com. I sort of imagine the doom crowd as crossing its legs and pinching its crotch in anticipation of imminent civilizational collapse. Conversely, Greer thinks this will be a slow, drawn-out process in which humanity slims down dramatically, possibly develops an "eco-technic' society and fails to live up to the cave-dwelling promise of the Olduvai Gorge Theory.
You know, if he is right, and the decline of industrial civilization is a long, drawn out process, I don't see why people consider here so ridiculous to comtemplate things like machine intelligence, aspects of transhumanism, fusion energy, etc. We would still have so many decades in which to see advances. That's a long time to hold your pee, Doomers.
I look at the explosion in population and the technological society we live in as a "blossom" of sorts that will ultimately produce something fundamentally new and game-changing. Blossoms never last forever but they are the seed of something new. The healthy pulse of science and technology is pumping more strongly than ever before. Even of this immensely important trend turns out to be an "S-Curve" rather than a Kurzweilian Law of Accelerating Returns, there will be a fundamental "accomplishment" at the end of it.
Life on Earth has been growing more complex and sophisticated for billenia (if that's a word). I see no reason why the accomplishments of human beings will not contribute to this very long term trend. And even if the souffle of industrial civilization peaks and declines, this knowledge will not be lost. And people will not suddenly stop being curious about what else is possible.