by jamaal » Tue 26 Aug 2008, 04:16:01
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnConnor', 'J')amaal, interesting points but intel is only good if it is "intelligently" analyzed and the right decision maker(s) see it, they have to have the picture of what is going on and what it means and no matter how good your technology if your human systems, your military-intelligence services-diplomatic institutions-law enforcement-economic organizations all must work together using this in some sort of reasonably rational way which they typically have not for a concept like this to function, data mining and connecting the dots is possible but this a vastly more complex problem than what some of the intelligently linked database programs have done thus far as we know (targeted advertising, some crime investigation, etc...) - not that I would want it to, an operation like that as you pointed out not promoting it or judging it based on it's ethical grounds - your postulated method of control is possible but in my humble opinion not probable - it all rests on a level of control that I think no one would ever live under...ever, they really would rather die than be tagged cattle to be used by us - if the roles were reversed I have no doubt we would do the same, the indignity of living under the boot of someone ethnically different, religiously different and obviously using you, your nation, your resources, your people in the most base manner possible would inspire a resistance 100x what we currently see now, history is replete with examples of fighting no matter what you are up against, even some of the last great untapped hydrocarbon reserves left on Earth are not worth that in a material sense and obviously not ethically justifiable, as you have pointed out... besides, if we enacted an enormous operation like this, the rewards would not be worth it materially even, we would be continuing the policy of borrowing money from foreign governments (about 2 billion every 2.5 days) to fight a war to secure hydrocarbon resources that only distracts us from focusing our remaning energies (physical and mental) on building a long term, sustainable, local energy source...it is a self-defeating policy of going to the ATM with our credit card so we can go to the local crack dealer to get more crack...then repeating this process everytime we get low on crack...but I'm not negative not one bit...
The limitation we have at the moment is the inability/unwillingess to provide a master index or key to every human of interest. Without Biotagging, we get lost in deception, lies, distortions and social interpretation. tagging links people to actions, locations and to other people.
The concept does not rely much on inter-agency collab, although that helps if data is passed up the food chain. But even at the lowest level- that of running an efficient city prison where escape is improbable, fear is, to use that term "the key". Machiavelli indicated that love for leadership was preferred but hard, while fear was pretty good and easy.
It matters little how much residents in these cities hate the oppressors. The warsaw ghetto survived for yrs in much worse conditions e.g. in food supply. people will adapt and most won't suicide. Organised resistance would be an order of magnitude harder.
Prisons mostly work and would work better if the guards were actually guards instead of entrepreneurs.
Behaviour is also rewarded. Informing and staying clear of hostiles reaps bonuses. many societies have worked well on such principles. We may not agree with it, but in a hard crash scenario, it may be a case of enslaving others to ensure we enjoy operating theaters
with power, adequate food distribution etc.
Without passing judgment it is amazing how well the concept of slavery endured and still does to this day. The west may be amazed at the very idea of owning another human being but many parts
of the world still have adult and child slavery. Historically, Rome, Greece and many other empires depended on it. The development of the US was also hinged on slavery.
It would be nice if we could think our way thru this and do the
reforms required but i fear as long as money is able to be made, such measures will not be taken until it's too late.
It's at that point that people's survival instincts will cut in and
determine whether their child being educated and fed is worth the enslavement of hydrocarbon regions.
I'm open on that one, but hedge toward our ability to demonise enemies and others quite easily.
Sharing doesn't really come spontaneously on the playground and i suspect it won't when we want other people's national assets at a reasonable price and they don't quite see it that way.