Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby Cashmere » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 03:09:56

Wow. Now the MSM has connected the dots on supply.

How long til they figure out the ramifications long term?

MSMSeesIt

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')il from Canada's tar sands, currently producing about 1.2 million barrels a day, is arguably the most expensive oil in world, and is getting even more expensive.

Last year analysts estimated it cost around $60 a barrel to produce light oil from here. The most recent estimate from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) now puts that number at $75 to $90. Comparatively, Saudi Arabian crude is said to cost around $1 a barrel.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby wisconsin_cur » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 03:13:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'W')ow. Now the MSM has connected the dots on supply.

How long til they figure out the ramifications long term?

MSMSeesIt

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')il from Canada's tar sands, currently producing about 1.2 million barrels a day, is arguably the most expensive oil in world, and is getting even more expensive.

Last year analysts estimated it cost around $60 a barrel to produce light oil from here. The most recent estimate from the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) now puts that number at $75 to $90. Comparatively, Saudi Arabian crude is said to cost around $1 a barrel.


Or what has to happen before they feel like they can connect the dots publicly? The press, even if they "get it" cannot get too far ahead of the public without getting pushed aside as "gone wacko." Viewers (and more importantly ad dollars) than go somewhere else... somewhere telling people what they expect to hear and not what is necessarily so.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby joeltrout » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 11:17:42

There was some guy on CNBC yesterday saying that the tar sands were still economic at either $45 or $35/bbl. I forget which one but it shocked me and made me realize these are the people who are creating the problems.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby MadScientist » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 12:32:47

because the tar sands are so energy intensive, the price went up 50% as the cost of oil went up.


KSA oil at $1 and Canadian tar sands at $90.

Hmm it would be really interesting to see what the "average cost per barrel of crude oil production" is on a running graph worldwide.
"The future power is manpower"
User avatar
MadScientist
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 12:51:00

joel,

So...some people are just making up numbers. So what? Some of us have made a good living in the past doing just that. Of course, now that oil prices are up I don't have to do that any more.

Soory...just a little inside joke for joel about geologists and fund managers.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby zoidberg » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 13:06:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cashmere', 'W')ow. Now the MSM has connected the dots on supply.

How long til they figure out the ramifications long term?


When it becomes unavoidably obvious and even the majority of the otherwise unaware people become enmeshed in the fallout they will start pointing out the ramifications.

I'm guessing after another oil shock where it sends oil over $200/barrel even with the US mired in a deep recession. Then the question will be, how can prices be increasing in the US when demand is decreasing? The answer to that will probably be a Eureka moment. Right now the economy is sliding down and oil prices have slid a bit too, so the right question isnt being asked.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 13:38:00

For me zoid the question is: when will OPEC offset demand destruction by lowering output to raise prices while developing the internal self control to not compete with each other for market share? That's the day the world will enter into very new reality.

The answer: I don't make predictions. Maybe 2 years...maybe 30 years. But I do think we likely hit that new reality someday.

And what do you see as THE question?
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby MadScientist » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 13:47:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'F')or me zoid the question is: when will OPEC offset demand destruction by lowering output to raise prices while developing the internal self control to not compete with each other for market share? That's the day the world will enter into very new reality.

The answer: I don't make predictions. Maybe 2 years...maybe 30 years. But I do think we likely hit that new reality someday.

And what do you see as THE question?


well actually OPEC just recently removed quotas. what i lovingly refer to as "pumpin' all out".

The news today was that there is oversupply by Iran and Angola. Two OPEC countries which were probably quite happy about having their quotas lifted.

THE Question imo is when the next price shock will be.
"The future power is manpower"
User avatar
MadScientist
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby TheDude » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 13:55:57

Oh, OPEC didn't publicly announce they were giving up on quotas, did they? There were some juicy remarks from anonymous ministers, but ostensibly they'll still attempt to hew to them.

OPEC faces new challenges as global oil demand slows

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')nterestingly, after a long time, the issue of abiding by the OPEC output quotas is also back under hammer. The group's President Chakib Khelil while on a visit to Iran last week, emphasized that the OPEC members should keep oil output within the agreed targets. The issue of quota is also back on the table and with a vengeance this time, it seems.

Underlining the rapidly changing market dynamics, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has also cut its forecast for 2008 demand of oil from OPEC by 100,000 b/d despite raising the forecast for non-OPEC supply. Production is assuming to be an issue for now at least.


The price level was always a bone of contention, unlike those command economy socialists in, uh, Texas, that they modeled themselves after. :lol: Was making that joke before I started reading TOD, too. Kinda obvious. Free market, you say?

Anyway, nobody in OPEC wants to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs. Even more so with production costs headed up, and OECD looking ever more serious about pursuing oil-free alternatives. And as non-OPEC declines more and more thoroughly they'll have even more of an incentive to keep prices within a tight window. That might lend credence to the notion (espoused here by threadbear) that KSA are attempting to actively game the futures market.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 14:28:56

Such a crap shoot, eh Dude. There has to be a few OPEC members (seeing their clearly declining capabilities) ready to cut production to maximize prices. You know Hugo would like nothing better than to give himself a little breathing room and poke the US in the eye at the same time. We may not be too close to that tipping point but my gut tells me it may not be that many years out.

Hey...you wanna put a skids on alt development in the US? Cut oil imports to the point our society can just barely produce the necessities. You gotta admit it: it would be one world class game of "Chicken".
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby zoidberg » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 14:33:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', '
')And what do you see as THE question?


THE question for the world is when does the US fail as a nation state, analogous to the USSR. There are so many stressors acting upon them a single catalyzing event could trigger the built up economic, social, and structural problems in a cascading failure. Since the catalyzing events are inherently unpredictable(black swams) its impossible to predict a timeline, so its ironically pointless to ask when. All one can do is measure the tremors and make case by case analysis to gauge whether events like bank failures, or military withdrawals, or riots presage a deeper disturbance. The ramifications of another oil shock could trigger many catalytic events over the next presidential term, which could easily lead to the first dramatic step down. (The failure will take place over some time and occur in phases I believe)
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby ROCKMAN » Fri 22 Aug 2008, 15:01:07

Got it zoid. Your's is really THE BIG QUESTION. Mine was just one of the smaller Big Questions that would lead to your Bigger Question. And I do see the analogy to the USSR. We encouraged them to spend themselves into disaster just as we've encouraged our populace to do the same. The USSR built to many tanks and planes and we built too many sub-prime financed homes and big SUV's.

A rather silly comparision but, unfortunately, seems to work uncomfortably well.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby doodlebug2 » Sat 23 Aug 2008, 16:57:31

This post seems to be going of topic, BUT it is still good reading.

Back to tar sands, I do not know much about them, but all the info I read (here and internet) is that it is still costs more energy involved than to get energy out (bbl oil). To me , if the media ever brought this up, people would freak out. So many people believe that tar sands are our nations oil savior (are they?)
User avatar
doodlebug2
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby bl00k » Sat 23 Aug 2008, 18:57:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('doodlebug2', 'B')ack to tar sands, I do not know much about them, but all the info I read (here and internet) is that it is still costs more energy involved than to get energy out (bbl oil). To me , if the media ever brought this up, people would freak out. So many people believe that tar sands are our nations oil savior (are they?)

You are correct. It's called EROEI, energy returned on energy invested. I don't know the exact EROEI of tar sands but i do know you'll end up with a lot less energy extracting oil from tar sands than you do extracting oil from a 'regular' oil field. And most likely there are times when it actually will cost you more energy than you get out of it. People go crazy when they hear how much energy is in those canadian tar sands "more than Saudi Arabia has". The fact of matter is energy in the ground/energy in tar sands is useless. We need it in the form of light sweet crude oil. That transformation will cost us too much for Canada to constitute as having more oil than Saudi Arabia.

And no, tar sands are not our savior. Apart from what i stated above, more oil won't solve the oil problem.
The man who moves a mountain begins by carrying away small stones.
User avatar
bl00k
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 194
Joined: Sat 17 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby timmac » Wed 03 Sep 2008, 18:22:40

Yes high prices are here and might hang around for a while but oil looks as if it might dip below $100 a barrel very soon unless opec cuts production,,

how low can it go before it levels out,, I hope $90 a barrel is a least the bottom,, my business needs a gas break for a while,, last months gas bill was $2800.00...
User avatar
timmac
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Las Vegas

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby Cashmere » Wed 03 Sep 2008, 18:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('timmac', 'Y')es high prices are here and might hang around for a while but oil looks as if it might dip below $100 a barrel very soon unless opec cuts production,,

how low can it go before it levels out,, I hope $90 a barrel is a least the bottom,, my business needs a gas break for a while,, last months gas bill was $2800.00...


I'm hoping like mad it'll drop back to 90.

But I don't think it will.

The market seems to have settled into a bottom of 110.

My investment sense is telling me that I either buy in more now or I won't have a chance again at this price.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby timmac » Wed 03 Sep 2008, 19:54:55

I still hope it dips to $90 before it starts to rise again,, our economy could use a boost before old man winter gets here and people that are on a tight budget will get heating oil for there homes.

However winter is not a problem where I am from here in Vegas but lower gas will help with our tourist slow down we have been having lately.

I hope Isreal puts off bombing Iran for a year or two,, that will screw the prices up fast..
User avatar
timmac
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Las Vegas

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby zoidberg » Wed 03 Sep 2008, 22:39:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bl00k', '
')You are correct. It's called EROEI, energy returned on energy invested. I don't know the exact EROEI of tar sands but i do know you'll end up with a lot less energy extracting oil from tar sands than you do extracting oil from a 'regular' oil field.


EROI is about 1.5-3 depending on various things. It is however trending down as the mining operations have to go farther and farther. Typical resource depletetion story.

Deep sea oil operations have an EROI of about 5.

The first oil fields had an EROI of about 100.

I'm not too sure what the EROI of a Saudi oil field is but I've heard 20-1.

The tar sands will remain profitable in both dollar and energy terms for quite some time, however they will not scale up much farther. It is correct to state they are not a replacement for Arabian light crude. It is not correct to state they are worthless. With Shale gas ramping up rapidly they can provide a substantial liquid fuel output for many years.

What one has to keep in mind is that they allow for a consistent output for long periods of time, without a substantial growth potential. Their EROI wont go below one for decades. This doesnt support a growth based economy, but does support a constant state economy.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby zoidberg » Wed 03 Sep 2008, 22:44:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('timmac', 'I') still hope it dips to $90 before it starts to rise again,, our economy could use a boost before old man winter gets here and people that are on a tight budget will get heating oil for there homes.

However winter is not a problem where I am from here in Vegas but lower gas will help with our tourist slow down we have been having lately.

I hope Isreal puts off bombing Iran for a year or two,, that will screw the prices up fast..


Support is in the 100-110 range. Its unlikely to dip to 90. A dip to 90 would need a significant global pullback.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america
Top

Re: MSM - Oil Won't Go Below 100 - High Prices Here to Stay

Postby timmac » Wed 10 Sep 2008, 14:09:46

$102 a barrel as of today,, just maybe it might get into the $90 range,, how low will it go ????

Whats also strange is that $102 a barrel seems cheap..
User avatar
timmac
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Las Vegas

Next

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron