Peak Oil Is a Scam to Promote World Depopulation

by **EnemyCombatant** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 10:44:03

I have been trolling this board for a while and I have performed a search, and I couldn't find a discussion regarding this article. Please comment.

If there is a thread on this article, then just forward me to that thread. Thanks!

http://www.the7thfire.com/peak_oil/peak ... lation.htm

Note this was written October 12, 2004

by **Egon_1** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 11:12:55

David McGowan is a quack. Just look at all the (different) conspiracy stories he pomotes.

by **crude_intentions** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 11:18:24

Reading that site has really put my Mind at ease. Now I understand its not Peak Oil we have to worry about. But the nefarious plots of the New World Order and the Illuminati :roll:

by **aahala** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 11:35:09

Depending on one's viewpoint, the great or bad thing about the internet is that anyone with a few bucks and token knowledge can put a website up, expressing their view, not bound by reality, not bound by physical laws and hardly bound by our imagination.

I've seen webpages claiming the author was subjected to anal probes by aliens, a missle rather than a plane hit the Pentagon and that all species are exactly the way they were a billion years ago.

What's a feller to think? :-D

by **CarnbY** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 12:24:22

The guy obviously seems like an idiot, but is it correct that Saudi oil reserves are 1.2 trillion barrels, as opposed to 261 billion as previously thought? Wouldn't that in itself make the PO situation irrelevant for a long time to come?

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=6&section ... m=4&y=2004

by **Arkwright** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 12:49:33

His arguments seems to be based on the assumption that oil is not formed from rotting biological compounds of dinosaur age, but by geothermal processess in high pressure deep under the surface - thus being renewable and that explains why some oil-wells have refilled. He also assumes that there are vast quantities of oil deeper that have been drilled so far.

I dont deny the possibility of geothermal processes having something to do with oil-formation, but if the oil refill rates and those hidden stashes of oil would be real in amount he suggests, wouldnt oil companies do what they can to use them? Specially with prices like these - but then comes the conspiracy theories, and rest of it is just a laugh.

by **gunslinger** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:05:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he guy obviously seems like an idiot, but is it correct that Saudi oil reserves are 1.2 trillion barrels, as opposed to 261 billion as previously thought?

by **CarnbY** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:12:04

Thanks for clearing that up gunslinger, it did sound too incredible to be true

by **Grasshopper** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:35:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Egon_1', 'D')avid McGowan is a quack. Just look at all the (different) conspiracy stories he pomotes.

by **EnemyCombatant** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:37:06

Why does McGowan go after Ruppert? I have been a longtime reader of fromthewilderness.com and Ruppert has my respect. Is this a mis-information campaign?

However, I do not like to rule out any theories that might help to explain the state of insanity we have created for ourselves.

Has anyone here ever wondered or discussed what is the endgame? Sure the 'powers that be' know about peak oil and that time is running out. This is most indicative in the ANWR drilling. But then what?

Are they planning on a mass die off (www.dieoff.org) and saving x number of barrels of oil for themselves to live in a utopian city. While the rest of us that are left live in the countryside resorting to cannibalism.

I have 2 young children, a great husband and an almost perfect life. I am sure that most of you have happy lives also. How are we supposed to deal with this? Do we need a mass information campaign? What type of activism is required? I have been an activist for several years and I am down for putting in the work.

by **Ludi** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:48:46

Consider that the wealthy depend on a large and growing population to support them. Killing off those who provide your wealth doesn't make any kind of sense. Where's the motivation?

by **EnemyCombatant** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:56:30

The planet cannot sustain so many people based upon our resources.

Refer to http://www.dieoff.org and http://www.ecofuture.org/pk/pkcapcty.html.

IMO, the planet can sustain these populations if mankind would use it's talents and technolgies to evolve instead of the greed and waste that has been occuring since industrialization.

We made our bed so now we have to sleep in it.

The elites will not require 6 billion people to serve their needs. I am sure they can get by with quite a few less than that.

But note, this is just one theory I am throwing out there because I really don't know. So far, nothing makes sense to me.

I am open minded.

by **Ludi** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 13:59:41

But the entire system that promotes wealth for these people depends on growth. They would not willingly and deliberately put a stop to the very system which makes them wealthy, is what I'm telling you.

by **Grasshopper** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:00:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'W')hy does McGowan go after Ruppert? I have been a longtime reader of fromthewilderness.com and Ruppert has my respect. Is this a mis-information campaign?

by **EnviroEngr** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:02:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'W')hy does McGowan go after Ruppert? I have been a longtime reader of fromthewilderness.com and Ruppert has my respect. Is this a mis-information campaign?
....

by **gunslinger** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:11:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow are we supposed to deal with this? Do we need a mass information campaign? What type of activism is required? I have been an activist for several years and I am down for putting in the work.

by **EnemyCombatant** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:12:42

Yes I know, I am reading Crossing the Rubicon.

The reason why I respect Ruppert is because he takes a prosecutorial approach to his deductions. Which lends him credibility.

Before I go on a peak oil crusade looking like a fool, I want to be sure I am right.

by **EZODIAK** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:39:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnviroEngr', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'W')hy does McGowan go after Ruppert? I have been a longtime reader of fromthewilderness.com and Ruppert has my respect. Is this a mis-information campaign?
....

by **EnviroEngr** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 14:45:16

I need to gather up my thoughts on that.

I think Monte may have alluded to this but I haven't seen a good run down on "follow the money" yet; I can take a stab at it tonight.

Good point.

by **MonteQuest** » Thu 17 Mar 2005, 23:12:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnemyCombatant', 'I') have been trolling this board for a while and I have performed a search, and I couldn't find a discussion regarding this article. Please comment.

If there is a thread on this article, then just forward me to that thread. Thanks!

http://www.the7thfire.com/peak_oil/peak ... lation.htm

Note this was written October 12, 2004

Peak Oil Is a Scam to Promote World Depopulation

Peak Oil Is a Scam to Promote World Depopulation

About Mike R.

Re: About Mike R.

Money, money, money

Re: Peak Oil Is a Scam to Promote World Depopulation

Who is online