Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Oil Market

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby ECM » Wed 09 Mar 2005, 01:17:07

There is currently a black market for fuel in many parts of Iraq. It is very profitable for those running it and the only way some people can keep vehicles running.
User avatar
ECM
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Liamj » Sun 13 Mar 2005, 19:23:52

Thats what concerns me ECM, given govts habit of cackhanded admin, some off-ration trade will be essential just to keep thibngs working.
Unless trading explicitly sanctioned, via Domestic Tradable Quota's or some such.
http://www.feasta.org/documents/energy/dtqsoct2003.htm
User avatar
Liamj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: 145'2"E 37'46"S

Abolishing the world spot market?

Postby Sgs-Cruz » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 14:38:58

Does anyone know any history of how the world spot market for oil (and, to a lesser extent, natural gas) came into existence, and how hard it would be to "tear it up" so to speak?

I ask this as a Canadian wondering about my country's future energy supply. Right now we're obligated to pay the same for oil as anyone around the world using our oil... how hard would it be for the government to nationalize the industry and sell it to Canadians for less?

Yes, I realize the concept of this may make me unpopular. I'm not advocating the idea, I'm throwing it out there for discussion.
User avatar
Sgs-Cruz
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada

Postby BAM » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 15:36:07

US Oil Suppliers

Canada584Mb/annum
Mexico584
S.Arabia548
Venezuela475
Nigeria402
Iraq256
Angola110
UK110
Algeria73
Kuwait73

I don't think it would go down too well.
User avatar
BAM
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu 24 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Abolishing the world spot market?

Postby Nano » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 15:37:31

It's a question of trading rights. If Canada won't sell it's oil under certain terms, it might become worthwhile for other countries to boycot Canada, or even invade it. You have to know how far you can go. That's what some of the middle eastern countries are worried about. They may say: We can pump no more oil! but if we don't believe them, we might invade them.
User avatar
Nano
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Delft, Netherlands

Re: Abolishing the world spot market?

Postby tdrive » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 15:45:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')oes anyone know any history of how the world spot market for oil (and, to a lesser extent, natural gas) came into existence, and how hard it would be to "tear it up" so to speak?


Market signals are important and it would be almost impossible
to "tear it up", let alone it would be so detrimental to the world
trade just because you feel the pinch. If you think it is expensive,
don't buy it. This would drive the price down. Just because you happen
to live where oil comes from does not entitle you to cheap oil.
Else you will have communism. Which one you prefer?

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Abolishing the world spot market?

Postby aahala » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 15:57:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sgs-Cruz', '
')I ask this as a Canadian wondering about my country's future energy supply. Right now we're obligated to pay the same for oil as anyone around the world using our oil... how hard would it be for the government to nationalize the industry and sell it to Canadians for less?



Canada might be able to do it in some way, some other
countries do it.

I don't really think your concern is your country's future energy supply. Lower domestic prices mean greater, more rapid resource exhaustion not the other. If your true concern is as you state, you should support goverment charging more not less.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Dezakin » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 17:48:21

If Canada is so concerned about its future energy supply, It can quite easily set export quotas, tariffs, or other restrictions. This will drive down price locally; But not monotonically because supply is a function of price. The tar sands of Alberta would be less economical to process, foreign investment has a lower incentive to pump canadian oil, etcetera.

Russia is currently going through these issues. They not more than several years ago had export quotas.

aahala:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')ower domestic prices mean greater, more rapid resource exhaustion not the other.


I have to disagree here. Lower prices are a symtom, not a cause. If lower prices are due to supply issues (oil is easier to get) then it will mean speedy resource exhaustion. If the low prices are because of demand paucity, then people just wont bother spending money on oil infrastructure.

Really Canada wont do this because its a violation of NAFTA. Economically I suspect even if Canada did this, it would be a wash at best.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Postby OilsNotWell » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 17:59:06

Slight contango still about 7 months out (past "refinery maintenance phase")...

The forward curves continuing to keep pace, and/or seem to be flattening out futher...what does this mean?

Could someone describe or post what the WTI forward curves were like around 1981 and/or 1990?

Boy, look at those prices just a month ago...$10 rise. So volatile, could come down just as fast, maybe?
User avatar
OilsNotWell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby tdrive » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 18:09:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')gain, is this normal?


It is perfectly normal. It's called scarcity rent and was first described by Hotelling. Here is a bite for you:

Price, scarcity rent, and a modified r per cent rule for non-renewable resources

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby tdrive » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 18:13:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f Canada is so concerned about its future energy supply, It can quite easily set export quotas, tariffs, or other restrictions.


Dude, can you spell N.A.F.T.A.? Wake up and stop kidding yourself.

Cheers,
User avatar
tdrive
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun 11 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Postby FatherOfTwo » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 18:38:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tdrive', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f Canada is so concerned about its future energy supply, It can quite easily set export quotas, tariffs, or other restrictions.


Dude, can you spell N.A.F.T.A.? Wake up and stop kidding yourself.

Cheers,


Too true. But apparently the American's can't spell NAFTA either... either that or they can't spell "softwood lumber" or "cattle".

The problem is, Canada's largest trading partner is the US. If the US gets sick, so does Canada (for the most part, especially Eastern Canada) Oh, and there is also that problem about military strength too. The one great equalizer may be the loonie versus the US dollar, but if the loonie gets too strong, then the manufacturing sector in Eastern Canada would be decimated.
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country
Top

Postby smiley » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 18:59:57

There is a way around it. The government can refund the money they make from the oil companies (taxes, dividends, land leases) in the form of a subsidy for local consumers. Its perfectly legal and it has been proposed (and rejected) here in parliament.

The problem is that by subsidizing internal consumption you're hurting the exports.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Postby OilsNotWell » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 19:14:50

Thanks for the tip!

chart

Although, I'm not sure what that means yet....have to read more I guess! :)

Was Hotelling Right? Depletion Effects and the Scarcity Rent Path 5/98 (with oil examples)

And this is a paper quite on point:

Optimal World Oil Extraction - Calibrating and Simulating the Hotelling Model

This has many graphs, but I can't figure out how to post from a pdf file, could someone who knows how do so?

It predicted market pricing under certain assumptions of $120/bbl, would be interesting for other to see.

and another link:

Hotelling Revisited (6/2004) - Oil Prices and Endogenous Technological Progress
User avatar
OilsNotWell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Sgs-Cruz » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 21:58:14

To tell you the truth, if peak oil happens in a (fairly) big way, I don't see NAFTA lasting long anyway. What do we depend on NAFTA so much for, anyway? Car sales from Ontario to the USA? I think we can live without that if gas costs so much that nobody can drive.

And the resources we would be selling to them, we can still sell to them, but have the option of cutting off exports if Canada's needs are not being met.

For those that would say, Canada is obligated to sell oil to the USA: sell to the country that had the largest production in the world for a long time? Heh.

The only problem is Canada becoming the 51st through 63rd states.
User avatar
Sgs-Cruz
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada

Postby OilsNotWell » Mon 21 Mar 2005, 11:21:19

Contango now 11 mos out, clearly past any "refinery maintenance" issue...
User avatar
OilsNotWell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Pops » Mon 21 Mar 2005, 12:19:53

I don’t know much about the math I took…

But I was surprised when I googled “contangoâ€
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Postby nth » Tue 22 Mar 2005, 12:40:54

Interesting to hear Brent is out of sync with WTI.
What about the Singaporean market?
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Postby johnmarkos » Wed 13 Apr 2005, 14:46:29

Later futures prices now exceed the May, 2005 price out to June, 2007.

They exceed the June, 2005 price as late as November, 2006.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

peakoil.com: open source energy and market research

Postby johnmarkos » Fri 22 Apr 2005, 14:16:46

It occurs to me that by contributing data, information, knowledge, and opinion to this site, we are developing a hugely valuable research tool. We create a common awareness of developing data and use "the wisdom of crowds" to refine our understanding of the implications of that data.

Seems like, considering the immense value of this knowledge, we should be able to get a think tank to hire us all so we can quit our day jobs and become full time public intellectuals.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron