by ubercynicmeister » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 20:00:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'u')bercynic, how about telling us some of the guys message?
HECK, where do I start?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ') As for role models, when I was a kid I wanted to be like Jimmy Stewart, Humphrey Bogart, Steve McQueen, James Garner and that scientist guy who invented the Time Machine (his name escapes me at the moment) Cary Grant was way too polished for me. James Coburn was too slick. Charles Bronson too tough (I was a sensitive kid, somewhat, though I got in my fair share of fights). Threadbear, Unknown Element you're about my age (well, almost) who did you ladies look up to on the silver screen? Betty Davis, Kate Hepburn, Faye Dunaway? Did they influence you?
The 'role model' is a very American thing....us Australians usually are highly amused by the idea of a role model, it sounds like something you'd use in baking bread (bread 'roll' model for those who don't get it).
Except those Aussies who slavishly follow Yuppie fads, but for them there's no hope anyway.
They need a good dose of this:
<A HREF="http://www.despair.com">I Found The Cure For Hope</A>
Anyhoo, getting back to The Myth Of Male Power, I think that as we're discussing excessive consumption a quote or two may be in order (and I'm trying not to infringe copyright):
Page 23 on 'Spending Power':
A Study of ...shopping malls (including men's shops and sporting goods stores) found that seven times [ie: 700% more - ubercynic] as much floor space is devoted to women's personal items as to men's.
Overall, women control consumer spending by a wide margin in vitually every consumer category. With spending power comes other forms of power."
Page 24:
Even in Japan, women are in charge of the family finances - a fact that was revealed to the average American only after the Japanese stock market crashed in 1992 and thousands of [Japanese] women lost billions of dollars their husbands never knew they had invested.
Page 25:
Historically, a husband spent the bulk of his day under the eye of his boss - his source of income; a wife did not [My emphasis - Ubercynic] spend the bulk of her day under the eye of her huspand - her source of income. She had more control over her working life than he had over his.
Page 26:
In the United States, almost one million municipal firefighters volunteer to risk their lives to save [complete] strangers. Ninety nine percent of [those volunteers] are men. In exchange they ask only for appreciation. In exchange they are ignored.
Pages 26 and 27:
[A San Diego journalist, Steve ] returned home every day to have lunch with his wife. Recently as he got near the door, he heard his wife screaming. She was being attacked [by an intruder] with a knife. Steve fought the assailant off his wife. His wife ran to call the Police The intruder killed Steve. Steve was 31.
A friend of mine put it this way: 'What would you pay someone who agreed that, if he was ever with you when you were attacked , he would intervene and try to get himself killed slowly enough to give you time to escape? What is the hourly wages of a bodyguard? You know that is your job as a man - every time you are with a woman ...any woman, not just your wife.'
What do men as women's bodyguards and men as volunteer firefighters have in common, besides being men? They are both unpaid. Men have not yet begun to investigate their unpaid roles.
The best one, though is a letter Warren Farrell recieved:,
Page 312:
My family and I are voters of the 'traditional Democratic constituency' who have just become Republicans.
The Democratic Party...has consistently:
- favoured discrimination against men in employment, university admissions, divorce and child custody.
-supported absurd laws (such as those on 'marital rape' and 'sexual harrassment' ) which allows the conviction of innocent men on the sole basis of uncorroborated...accusations by women...
The Democratic Party seems intent on reducing American men to Second Class citzens
Eric D Sherman.
Please go to Warren Farrell's web-site to have a look for his book, and PLEASE read it, if you want to understand why George Dubbya won the 2004 election (well, won a lot of votes in 2004 anyway):
<A HREF="http://www.warrenfarrell.com">Warren Farrell</A>
OH, and incase you think Warren Farrell is not a feminist, he was elected three times (the only man to do so) to the board of the National Organistaion (for) Women.
He very MUCH is a male feminist.
I think the work is the most important book ever published on the 'gender agenda', and is certainly the most honest.