Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby cube » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 01:42:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'S')o any right wing loonie explain this to me:

-if I start up my own business, invest my own cash in it, and I go bankrupt. Will the state give me money to save my a$$? Will it give me your money? Will it give me enough of your money so I can just continue my business as if nothing happened?

-and if not, then why does it bail out Northern Rock, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, to name but a few capitalists - private companies like all other private companies - who should have gone bankrupt.

-why are these losers more important than me?

-and why should I give bankrupt capitalists a single one of my hard earned greenbacks?

Capitalism is fake. It doesn't work. It's bankrupt. The system is one big scam.


So capitalists, neoliberal market fundamentalists, and other right wing ayatollahs, I want some answers to these questions. Now.
You have a better economic system you want to share with us? :wink:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Cashmere » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 01:53:19

Seldom seen, as usual, is right.

He/she could write the f----ing script that is going to be read, shortly, by Benjamin Shalom Bernanke and Henry Merritt Paulson.
Massive Human Dieoff <b>must</b> occur as a result of Peak Oil. Many more than half will die. It will occur everywhere, including where <b>you</b> live. If you fail to recognize this, then your odds of living move toward the "going to die" group.
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Daniel_Plainview » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 01:57:24

Practical question: how can the US afford to bailout all these banks, mortgage lenders, and investment houses while simultaneously running several wars in the Middle East ?
User avatar
Daniel_Plainview
Prognosticator
Prognosticator
 
Posts: 4220
Joined: Tue 06 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: 7035 Hollis ... Near the Observatory ... Just down the way, tucked back in the small woods

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby lorenzo » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:06:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'S')o any right wing loonie explain this to me:

-if I start up my own business, invest my own cash in it, and I go bankrupt. Will the state give me money to save my a$$? Will it give me your money? Will it give me enough of your money so I can just continue my business as if nothing happened?

-and if not, then why does it bail out Northern Rock, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, to name but a few capitalists - private companies like all other private companies - who should have gone bankrupt.

-why are these losers more important than me?

-and why should I give bankrupt capitalists a single one of my hard earned greenbacks?

Capitalism is fake. It doesn't work. It's bankrupt. The system is one big scam.


So capitalists, neoliberal market fundamentalists, and other right wing ayatollahs, I want some answers to these questions. Now.
You have a better economic system you want to share with us? :wink:


Sure: state-owned capitalism.

You allow the free market to do its work, but the State makes all the orders. So you make an order, and let the bidding begin. The state only buys from the best producer. Consumers buy from the state, whose representatives they elect.

Trials show that this works very well.

In Hoboken, a community over here in Flanders, local marxists came to power with this idea (can you imagine? In this day and age, a group of marxists actually comes to power in one of the world's most highly developed regions).

They immediately tried things out, in particular in the sector of health care and energy. The state makes an order ("we need the cheapest generic antibioticum"), and the manufacturers bid. The winning product is then sold to consumers, via partly state-owned farmacies and doctors. The consumers pay 500% less for a drug that is twice as good and thrice as universally available, and twenty times less frequently proscribed and only if there is a real need. Society wins, wins, wins and wins.

They're now trying to do the same with energy.

In any case, the role of the State must be stressed much more once again.

In current free market maniacal capitalism, it is the other way around: the State only gets to act when it's too late, or when consumers lose everything, actually die (as in the U.S., where people are dieing on the street because they can't afford a house or basic healthcare), or ruin their children's future (not to speak of the planet's future).

Clearly, neoliberal free market capitalism has had it's day. It is totally passe. The future has something very different in store. That much can be said.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby lorenzo » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:16:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DoomWarrior', '[')b]Practical question: how can the US afford to bailout all these banks, mortgage lenders, and investment houses while simultaneously running several wars in the Middle East ?


Image

The price of pulp for paper has gone up a bit though.
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:20:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '-')if I start up my own business, invest my own cash in it, and I go bankrupt. Will the state give me money to save my a$$? Will it give me your money? Will it give me enough of your money so I can just continue my business as if nothing happened?


Are you kidding? Not only will your business fail, but they'll try to pull out the hobby loss rule or the passive loss rule to refuse letting you deduct the loss from your taxes.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Peleg » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:22:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lentilsmine', 'O')h, BTW:

http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/art ... a997fa.htm

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. shares continued to slide Friday, at one point falling more than 15 percent amid speculation the investment bank is struggling financially.

Lehman shares slid $1.83 or 10.6 percent, to $15.47 in late afternoon trading. Earlier in the session, shares hit a nine-year low of $13.29.

Shares had already declined more than 24 percent this week.

"There is concern and speculation that Freddie, Fannie and Lehman won't be around on Monday," said Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist at Federated Investors, referring to problems at the nation's largest mortgage purchasers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, which both were rocked again Friday, along with Lehman, the fourth-largest investment bank in the U.S. [...]


Can someone help a poor neophyte here? Who buys these things? Like if the worse case rolls out and the twins and Lehman are 'gone' what are we talking about who steps in? Does Chase come in, the Fed, where is the nickel?

I'm not as dumb as my stock photos suggest, but I do understand that talking about how the push rods move the pistons in your engine is not going to undo the E reading on your gas gauge. Such large scale limiting factors which are in every way immovable are too simplistic for some people. So we know that supply constraints on oil and trying to borrow our way out of the last recession are kiling us right now. My question is when the market says value is being destroyed who out there has this big pile of 'real assets' that they can use to calm the storm? The Fed can't just print unlimited amounts of money, or lower rates to zero, they sure as anything cannot start raising rates right now can they? Cramer was talking that the housing crunch was deflationary in a big way so that to me suggests he think dropping another point or something? I don't want to spend too long reading the mind of a madman and I do not invite him into my scary mind any time soon, but they can only go up, down or stay the same. If none of it can be done without making things worse then the Fed at this moment is irrelevant right? The lesser of three evils is what, legislation after the fact?

I hate to rage against the machine now because it is a little late, but listen these people in these positions are supposed to

a) have a deep understand of the systems they work with

b) have a sense of conscience that balances indivudal empowerment of the consumer and entrepeneuer, and even corpoations as citizens with the idea of ethics and mutual benefits of a complex society

Where is the consience? Where is the outrage? Where is the wisdom? Why is it really happening, when does it end?

One of the dudes on CNBC was talking to Cramer (somehow Cramer is everywhere in the alst 12 hours) and talking how America is positioned better than any other nation for explosive growth in the next 20 years, because he said our technology in nano, bio, is so far advanced to others. I just about fell out of my chair. If that is the level of insight into our economy that these so called analysts have we are trapped at the bottom of very deep mine and a collapse is in process. These guys are going to tell us to 'stay the course' and actually dig the pit deeper. The answer to them apparently is not getting out of the mine but rather to burrow another mile or two under the ground until the heat of the core starts to burn our flesh from our bones.

I once wrote to an important person and said 'stay the course.' I was wrong in all my recomendations leading to that, and I forgot to predicate it with this. First do the right thing, and then while standing on what is right, stay the course.

[Forgive me for this but cartoon idea: Men working in a mine, one says 'We better get out it looks like the shaft won't hold for much longer' The other one looks over and says 'Not yet we're almost there' and then about two feet deeper you show the flames of hell with people churning in their sorrow.]
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:59:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', 'S')o any right wing loonie explain this to me:

-if I start up my own business, invest my own cash in it, and I go bankrupt. Will the state give me money to save my a$$? Will it give me your money? Will it give me enough of your money so I can just continue my business as if nothing happened?

No.
That's because you are unimportant.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '-')and if not, then why does it bail out Northern Rock, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, to name but a few capitalists - private companies like all other private companies - who should have gone bankrupt.

They do it because NR of Fannie is far more important than you are.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '-')why are these losers more important than me?

Because they can keep bankrupt system trading for a while more.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '-')and why should I give bankrupt capitalists a single one of my hard earned greenbacks?

I don't know.
I think, you shouldn't...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')apitalism is fake. It doesn't work. It's bankrupt. The system is one big scam.
We all know that...


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o capitalists, neoliberal market fundamentalists, and other right wing ayatollahs, I want some answers to these questions. Now.

If you don't give them, I see no reason why I should give up my membership of the communist party.
Communists will also screw you up.
Plenty of precedence of it.

I think, our overall problem is like this:

Technological civilization is unable to develop working and stable social system (capitalism, communism or whatever else does not work), so it must collapse.

You are going to be an observer of this process.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby 7-Zark-7 » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 03:06:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'Y')ou have a better economic system you want to share with us? :wink:


One of the most perplexing problems future economic historians will face will be that of explaining why almost every 19th and 20th Century government allowed private banks to create almost all the money their citizens used even to the extent of requiring their state treasuries to pay interest for the loan of money private banks had created merely by making entries in their account books when the governments could have created an equivalent amount of currency the same way themselves and financed, interest-free, whatever they wished to do. At the very least, the practice constituted - and constitutes - a massive subsidy to the banking sector and to the wealthiest groups in society.

The Guernsey Monetary Experiment showing that money can work work without being based on a debt-based fractional reserve system.

The Guernsey system dates back to the period just after the Napoleonic Wars which had seriously damaged the island's economy because they prevented smuggling, the people's most important income source.

As a result, the island was in a distressed state: "The deep roads ... in wet weather became muddy rivers between steep banks. The town was ill-paved and unattractive, and there was not a vehicle for hire of any kind on the island. There was no trade, nor hope of employment for the poor. Worst of all, the sea was encroaching the land, and washing away large tracts of it, thanks to the sorry state of the dykes."

There seemed little possibility that the island's government would be able to erect the necessary sea defences, which were expected to cost £10,000, since the £2,390 interest bill on Guernsey's public debt of £19,137.

The situation seemed insoluble; existing borrowing costs were consuming 80% of the island’s revenues. What was already an unsustainable debt burden would need to be doubled to fund the two most essential infrastructure projects.

This was when a committee of States members was formed by the then-Bailiff, Daniel DeLisle Brock, in what proved to be the defining moment for the island’s finances. He is still commemorated on Guernsey £1 notes, as is the Town Market which was one of the first beneficiaries of the Experiment.

Like all great ideas, the principles were straightforward. The committee realized that if the Guernsey States issued their own notes to fund the project, rather than borrowing from an English bank, there would be no interest to pay. This would lead to substantial savings. Because as anyone with a mortgage should understand, the debtor ends up paying at least double the amount borrowed over the long-term.

While some of the committee were merchants, they were not necessarily financial wizards. They did, however, appreciate the risk of previous schemes involving government debt which led to concurrent crises a century earlier – the Mississippi Bubble in France and then the South Sea Bubble in London.

The irresponsible creation of credit is a dangerous game that temporarily benefits the current generation but steals from the next; a lesson that has been forgotten yet again in modernity. To bring balance to the equation, therefore, the people of Guernsey had to find a way to neutralize such deficits while neither contracting nor expanding the money supply.

On a purely practical level, this was achieved by adding a sell-by date to the notes in issue, rather like a maturity date on a bond. For example, on a note issued 21 November 1827, it "Promises to pay the bearer One Pound on the first of October 1830". This begs the question as to how the future obligation was to be honored, but again, a simple mechanism was implemented whereby rent from the resulting infrastructure and tax revenues on liquor was set aside into a sinking fund to pay off the interest-free borrowing.

The end result of the Guernsey Experiment was spectacular – new roads, sea defenses and public buildings were established, fostering widespread trade and prosperity. Full employment was achieved, no deficits resulted and prices were stable, all without a penny paid in interest. What started as a trial led to a string of construction projects, which still stand and function to this day. Money was used in its purest form: as a convenient mechanism for oiling the wheels of commerce and development.

Today, if someone uses a bank on the island to cash a cheque or draws money from an automatic teller with a plastic card, they will receive Guernsey currency which the banks obtained from the States' Treasury in exchange for a sterling cheque for the same amount. The treasury then returns the sterling cheque to the bank which issued it to be lodged in a deposit account in the States' name. Each Guernsey note in circulation is therefore backed one-to-one by its British equivalent.

"We've got about £14m.-worth of notes and coin in circulation at the moment" Michael Browne, the States' Supervisor stated in early 1994. "It fluctuates a little with the seasons. It constitutes a £14m. interest-free loan for us - in fact, it's a loan we collect interest on. The payments we get on it from the banks make a small but useful contribution to the island's budget"

Although Browne says it would be possible for the States to spend the sterling it receives from the banks in payment for its currency, it no longer does so. "Our policy on this island is, if we can't afford a new school building or something like that, we don't borrow, but wait until we can pay for it before we put it up.

Thomas Jefferson – who was US President during the Napoleonic era – had uncanny foresight when he said "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

Read more about The Guernsey Experiment here.
Or here.
Or here
Or here

I can still spend a Guernsey Pound today....

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('unknown', 'C')ontrary to the teachings of current economics in all higher institutions, inflation is not related to the volume of money but rather to the size of the commercial debt.
User avatar
7-Zark-7
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat 28 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Guernsey, Channel Islands
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby cube » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 05:12:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lorenzo', '.')..
Sure: state-owned capitalism.

You allow the free market to do its work, but the State makes all the orders. So you make an order, and let the bidding begin. The state only buys from the best producer. Consumers buy from the state, whose representatives they elect.

Trials show that this works very well.

In Hoboken, a community over here in Flanders, local marxists came to power with this idea (can you imagine? In this day and age, a group of marxists actually comes to power in one of the world's most highly developed regions).

They immediately tried things out, in particular in the sector of health care and energy. The state makes an order ("we need the cheapest generic antibioticum"), and the manufacturers bid. The winning product is then sold to consumers, via partly state-owned farmacies and doctors. The consumers pay 500% less for a drug that is twice as good and thrice as universally available, and twenty times less frequently proscribed and only if there is a real need. Society wins, wins, wins and wins.

They're now trying to do the same with energy.

In any case, the role of the State must be stressed much more once again.

In current free market maniacal capitalism, it is the other way around: the State only gets to act when it's too late, or when consumers lose everything, actually die (as in the U.S., where people are dieing on the street because they can't afford a house or basic healthcare), or ruin their children's future (not to speak of the planet's future).

Clearly, neoliberal free market capitalism has had it's day. It is totally passe. The future has something very different in store. That much can be said.
I assume this system is to be used only for a small number of certain industries.
For example I think it's safe to say you do NOT want to have coffee shops, restaurants, and hotels to be handed over to the state!
What you are describing is not that much different than what we have today but with different industries. For example the government "manages" the roadways but in reality almost all construction work on roads is done by private companies through competitive bidding. Actually MOST government spending does not go to state employees but instead into private hands.

Exactly what should be in public hands vs. private, in America almost everything big and small is privately owned with the exception of some obvious cases, freeways, military, schools, etc... There is a false perception that corporate America is "conservative". On the contrary, some of the biggest proponents of government spending is corporate America so I like to think of them as liberals.

IndyMac Bank, Bear Stearns, Wall Street they are all liberals. :)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 06:16:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'A') stern looking Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke will appear before the Senate to underline the importance of "capitalizing" the FDIC. Due to unforeseen economic events that "never could have been predicted." The government working with the fed must "step in" to "support the important role of the FDIC during this correction in the market." Thus an unlimited credit line will be extended to the FDIC backed by the good faith of the US government.

Magnificent! I can just picture it...
Here's the thing: What if 2 or 3 of the other banks do fail in a short time? Is the reserve going to run the printers? Now, that's inflation for you!
Someone said the Fed couldn't lower the rates to 0%. Why? The Japanese did it for some time during the 90's.
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Twilight » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 08:41:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'T')hus an unlimited credit line will be extended to the FDIC backed by the good faith of the US government.

Nothing to discuss there. If there is one thing to which the full faith and credit of a government must be extended, it is to depositors. Otherwise you have revolution and a failed state. It is one of the few bailouts I will support.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby efarmer » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 10:13:50

We have had some extremely clear and simple wake up calls since the 1970's.

1. Petroleum is finite and we should segway from it in an organized and timeline driven manner.
We responded to this by an unprecedented explosion of
SUV serviced suburban asteroid belts with strip mall amenities.

2. Developers and financiers have bought the government and are doing crazy things with all the little people paying for the insurance policy they will collect on and we will all find depleted if we need it afterwards.

We responded to this by getting that jet ski we needed to survive
and the hot tub by tapping our home equity while we helped
little Johnny flip his first time share for his 21st birthday party.

This is more of the old saw, if you owe the bank $10,000 and you cannot pay, you have a terrible problem, if you owe them $10 million and cannot pay, we all have a terrible problem.

Before it is all said and done, wheat and corn for oil and minerals are going to get reestablished and the rest of the system fleshed out. Much of the abstract wealth on paper in this world is j money, (with j being an imaginary number.) Even so I think I will go to the FDIC and ask for the square root of negative one dollars back that I lost in the big bank debacle of 2008.

1 j$ unspent is 5 j$ unearned
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Peleg » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 12:46:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', 'S')omeone said the Fed couldn't lower the rates to 0%. Why? The Japanese did it for some time during the 90's.

Others have said that, but I did say it in this thread. My point was that interest rates at zero take away any opportunity to lower rates, so if you get to that level and the housing market has not bottomed out yet you have no more leverage that way against deflation. So it is a question of which is worse in this crisis, inflation or delfation.
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby lorenzo » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 12:50:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'C')ommunists will also screw you up.


I know communists screw us up. But at least they do it in such a way that you think it's in the interest of the Common Good. :-D
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Peleg » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 12:54:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarlosFerreira', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '
')A stern looking Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke will appear before the Senate to underline the importance of "capitalizing" the FDIC. Due to unforeseen economic events that "never could have been predicted." The government working with the fed must "step in" to "support the important role of the FDIC during this correction in the market." Thus an unlimited credit line will be extended to the FDIC backed by the good faith of the US government.


Magnificent! I can just picture it...

Here's the thing: What if 2 or 3 of the other banks do fail in a short time? Is the reserve going to run the printers? Now, that's inflation for you!

Someone said the Fed couldn't lower the rates to 0%. Why? The Japanese did it for some time during the 90's.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_De ... orporation

Where does the FDIC get the assets to cover a major collapse? The whole house of cars is predicated on exponentially growing energy supplies. There is only so much that fiat money can do when supply growth begins to affect economic activity. If every loan is a bet on future growth and then future growth appears to be less likely , all loans are at risk of default. Ergo all of the financial markets are endangered by peak oil.
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby DantesPeak » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 14:20:29

Peleg - Being a part of the US government, essentially the FDIC can borrow an unlimted amount of money to pay debts (if authorized by Congress, which it would).

But your point gets to the meat of the argument - how can you create wealth by issuing paper money when real wealth, in fact real money, is based on the use/value of energy.

US history shows that even in the so called 'deflationary' 1930s, the US government resorted to highly inflationary monetary policies that lead to a major devaluation of the dollar in 1932/1933. But that devaluation did not change the economy much, and may have even made it worse.

I expect the same to happen now, only that the ability to inflate, based upon new Fed procedures used just since November 2007, is be tremendously more.


On another topic, I am angry that the FDIC & FHLBB let IndyMac accumulate such a huge loss ($8 billion). The balance sheet reflected $1 in capital on March 31, so what they are saying is that the value of IndyMac's assets - mortgages and mortgage backed securities - have dropped about 30% in value since then.

If there are many other banks/thrifts out there that have assets really worth 30% less, then the cost to the government eventually may be near $1 trillion.
It's already over, now it's just a matter of adjusting.
User avatar
DantesPeak
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6277
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Jersey

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby Peleg » Sat 12 Jul 2008, 23:06:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'P')eleg - Being a part of the US government, essentially the FDIC can borrow an unlimted amount of money to pay debts (if authorized by Congress, which it would).
But your point gets to the meat of the argument - how can you create wealth by issuing paper money when real wealth, in fact real money, is based on the use/value of energy.

US history shows that even in the so called 'deflationary' 1930s, the US government resorted to highly inflationary monetary policies that lead to a major devaluation of the dollar in 1932/1933. But that devaluation did not change the economy much, and may have even made it worse.
I expect the same to happen now, only that the ability to inflate, based upon new Fed procedures used just since November 2007, is be tremendously more.

On another topic, I am angry that the FDIC & FHLBB let IndyMac accumulate such a huge loss ($8 billion). The balance sheet reflected $1 in capital on March 31, so what they are saying is that the value of IndyMac's assets - mortgages and mortgage backed securities - have dropped about 30% in value since then.
If there are many other banks/thrifts out there that have assets really worth 30% less, then the cost to the government eventually may be near $1 trillion.

I need a break from this. I'll stop back in from time to time. The facts are the thing is a mess and no one seems to want to be accountable. When you ask people who should know to give you a good explanation (not you) they respond with some high minded gibberish. Wealth out of nothing, ex nihilo money money money. Good luck with getting the masses to stay asleep forever. The vibe you get from the one;s in power is 'We are in power and you are not. Therefore, good bye!' Ok. Good bye.
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

IndyMac Bank seized by federal regulators

Unread postby something_awfull » Mon 14 Jul 2008, 01:46:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he federal government took control of Pasadena-based IndyMac Bank on Friday in what regulators called the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history.

Citing a massive run on deposits, regulators shut its main branch three hours early, leaving customers stunned and upset. One woman leaned on the locked doors, pleading with an employee inside: "Please, please, I want to take out a portion." All she could do was read a two-page notice taped to the door.
L.A Times


Welcome to the future....
User avatar
something_awfull
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Top

Re: IndyMac Bank shut down by Federal Government

Unread postby CarlosFerreira » Mon 14 Jul 2008, 16:03:29

OK, let's get this straight. I've heard the news, and there has been a public speech by Bernanke and Paulson, they went to the Congress to ask for a You-are-free-from-jail card to hold these guys, plus Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Nice. Pretty much what you said.

So, coupled with the mounting cost of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, plus the whole economic turmoil and the mounting pressure from Peak Oil, the US Govt. might run the printers to essentially create money out of nothing. Inflation follows.

Thing is, Asian countries with dollar reserves are already dumping dollars worth less and less in the market. So, even more money than the one being created artificially to supress the need for imaginary money.

Dollar loses more and more value, so dropping the rates will evidently won't help. Somewhere ahead, they will have to face the grim reality (after the elections, do you think), and raise the rates. That will essentially paralyze an economy that's already in life support. Will kill it to reset.

So, if my thinking is right, do you think the US Govt might be giving itself a bailout by postponing the tough decisions and giving the problem to the next one?

As we say here in Portugal, last man out please turn off the lights...
CarlosFerreira
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed 02 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Canterbury, UK

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron