by Ayame » Fri 04 Jul 2008, 03:22:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mercurygirl', '
')Well, if you're not a woman, to some degree you can be excused for not knowing the complex history of childbirth in the modern western world, specifically America. I'm posting a short video that shows the basic outline, as they did it better and quicker than I can. Watch it if you're inclined to be educated on the subject (turn off the cheesy music), and consider the fact that the USA is 33rd in the world in infant mortality rates, despite spending far more on the surrounding practices.
Your video is a complete red herring. It seeks to compare traditional at home childbirth of the 1700's and before with the practices of maternal instituations in the 1800's where even the wiki acknowledges that "Mortality rates reached horrible proportions in maternity institutions the 1800s, sometimes climbing to 40 percent of birthgiving women".
This has zero relation to what childbirth is like today in modern UK hospitals. Mothers today are not 'strapped down and drugged' and their babies 'dragged out disfigured with forceps'. If a doctor did this he would quickly be struck off the register. I have listened to countless stories from my work colleagues and friends of their birthing experiences and they were gateful for gas and epidurals and their doctors were properly trained. Maybe the US has been dropping the ball lately but that doesn't mean we should all give up completely, turn our back on medical advancement, and go back to traditional births at home with a midwife, some towels and bowl of hot water and pray for the people with complications. Please consider that one of my work colleagues would not be alive now if she had not been in hospital and had surgical intervation during labour.
edit
also from wiki:
At the beginning of the 1900s, maternal death rates were around 1 in 100 for live births. The number today in the United States is 13 in 100,000, a decline by orders of magnitude.