by MrBill » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 08:06:02
An imprecise science in any case. But that is okay, two medical doctors can look at the same symptoms, and not only come up with a different diagnosis, but also perscribe two different cures. And in the end their patient dies anyway!
The great thing about knowledge is that it is acquired independently. My knowledge does not depend on your understanding of the subject nor on any third party's acknowledgement. Therefore, you are prefectly welcome to have your own opinions without impinging one little bit on what I know.
I am not usually a selfish person, but in the end the most important thing is that I understand what is going on in the economy at large. It is nice if I can share that insight, but it is not necessary. I come here to share points of view with others to help understand the peak oil issue(s). And to challenge my assumptions. But at the end of the day I go home by myself and make my own plans independently of what anyone else here thinks, says or does.
I believe in whatever works. So if new information came out that invalidated my previous point of view I would simply change my opinion. Nothing you have ever said has even caused me to pause for a millisecond to reconsider my core understanding of economics, finance, banking or anything else. So your lowly opinion of economics as an imperfect science is really just your own misunderstanding of what I already know. Your perception is not my reality.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.