Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 07:14:56

Thanks Snik.

Even with whatever sort of breather increased drilling might allow it's difficult for many to imagine the potential disruption we could be facing very soon. The big wildcard goes back to the actual decline rate in Saudi. Many folks in the oil industry don't appreciate the scale and uniqueness. Even though there are some new plays of impressive size, as well as unknown developments in the future, it’s unlikely we’ll ever see enough new production to alter the arrival of PO by more than 5 or 10 years at most. But we badly need that extra time. The big downside to new drilling as well as the field developments already in progress is that many will think we’ve “fixed” PO and waste the time just as we did as the result of oil price collapse in the mid 80’s.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Snik » Tue 01 Jul 2008, 13:00:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', 'I') was wondering the same thing, but then again I'm not the one that brought in all this population stuff to begin with. It seems like this overshoot business is mostly what this site is about anyway when you boil it all down.


That was Dezakin and Electric_Economy.

No, this website isn't about just overshoot, but that key fact is pivotal to any and all discussions of solutions.

If we don't address over-population, all we are left with are short-sighted, short-term, selfish solutions...just like we have been doing for decades.....


Lol....you just contradicted yourself there Monte. This site isn't about overshoot, but since it is pivotal to any and all discussions (according to you) of solutions, every discussion ends up being about overshoot. Therefore, that is really what this site ends up being about.

You are absolutely right Rock. We need the time, but if we don't use that time wisely it will just put us back in the same spot again. We won't get many more, if any, chances to get this right. If the price of oil goes down precipitously, as it very well could, over the next year or so the fear would be that they would squander the time we've bought us. That is one of the flaws of a governmental system like ours....our leaders can't seem to see past the next election cycle to make hard long term decisions. I'm not in any way advocating a change in the system, I just think we all need to somehow make sure they don't forget what is coming.
User avatar
Snik
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 01:00:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ') Lol....you just contradicted yourself there Monte. This site isn't about overshoot, but since it is pivotal to any and all discussions (according to you) of solutions, every discussion ends up being about overshoot. Therefore, that is really what this site ends up being about.


No, every discussion ends up including overshoot, as it should be.

And according to me?

Are you saying you deny that we are in overshoot?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 08:52:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ')every discussion ends up being about overshoot. Therefore, that is really what this site ends up being about.


There are thousands of discussions about solutions which don't mention overshoot.
Ludi
 

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Snik » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:04:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ')every discussion ends up being about overshoot. Therefore, that is really what this site ends up being about.


There are thousands of discussions about solutions which don't mention overshoot.


You mean with 12,843 posts Monte managed to miss some? Amazing.
User avatar
Snik
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Snik » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 16:19:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ') Lol....you just contradicted yourself there Monte. This site isn't about overshoot, but since it is pivotal to any and all discussions (according to you) of solutions, every discussion ends up being about overshoot. Therefore, that is really what this site ends up being about.


No, every discussion ends up including overshoot, as it should be.

And according to me?

Are you saying you deny that we are in overshoot?


I understand that it is your Holy Grail, but we won't know we for sure until we start seeing the predicted results, correct? That's the way most things work....you predict something, and then you see how good your prediction is when that something you predicted either happens or it doesn't. Until then it's all conjecture just as Peak Oil is conjecture. We don't know if it's already happened, is happening now, is going to happen soon, or is going to happen on down the line. It's all guesswork until it happens, and it will probably take a few years to know for sure that it has happened when it does.

Now, that's a happening statement if I ever saw one. :P

Besides, you misread the statement. According to you, overshoot is pivitol to all discussions. The statement wasn't questioning overshoot....guess you're a little touchy on that one.
User avatar
Snik
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MrBean » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 17:09:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', 'P')eak Oil is conjecture. We don't know if it's already happened, is happening now, is going to happen soon, or is going to happen on down the line. It's all guesswork until it happens, and it will probably take a few years to know for sure that it has happened when it does.


There is also what could be called moving beyond the reasonable doubt.

Russia peaking, land export model, SA either not being able to produce more or leaving some in the ground for future generations (one aspect of land export model) mean that the jury has a verdict: this is the peak actual production (or at least, peak net exports), regardless of any ideal and imaginary production capacity that is never going to materialize.

Jury having a verdict on overshoot of population (not overshoot of wasting resources, that is a different issue and jury has extremely clear verdict on that) is a different story, because jury in overshoot could prove being overshoot beyond reasonable doubt only by jury die-off. In other words, overshoot belongs in that special category of predictions that has the capacity of turning the proving the prediction wrong by becoming consciouss of the prediction and acting to prevent it taking place as predicted.

So in case of overshoot, by the nature of accusation, jury is out at least untill it's own die off. Doesn't mean that the role of Cassandra presenting the case for overshoot would be unimportant, no, it's crucial.
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:23:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ')I understand that it is your Holy Grail, but we won't know we for sure until we start seeing the predicted results, correct?


It isn't a "prediction." Die-off is always the sequel to overshoot. It's already in the cards.

It's the way nature works. Always has and always will.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:25:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ') Peak Oil is conjecture. We don't know if it's already happened, is happening now, is going to happen soon, or is going to happen on down the line. It's all guesswork until it happens, and it will probably take a few years to know for sure that it has happened when it does.


Conjecture? That oil is finite and will have a production peak is conjecture? :roll:
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:31:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ')In other words, overshoot belongs in that special category of predictions that has the capacity of turning the proving the prediction wrong by becoming consciouss of the prediction and acting to prevent it taking place as predicted.


But we didn't prevent overshoot from taking place, even though we were conscious of it happening.

Now that we are in overshoot, we can't prevent the die-off.

Too late.

Watch the video especially about 5:45 in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hM1x4RljmnE
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:31:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ')overshoot belongs in that special category of predictions that has the capacity of turning the proving the prediction wrong by becoming consciouss of the prediction and acting to prevent it taking place as predicted.

So in case of overshoot, by the nature of accusation, jury is out at least untill it's own die off. Doesn't mean that the role of Cassandra presenting the case for overshoot would be unimportant, no, it's crucial.


I guess I'm not entirely sure what point you're making here. Are you saying there is no way to tell if a population is in overshoot until it dies off?

Or are you saying if we knew we might be nearing overshoot, we might have been able to avoid reaching overshoot?

Or both?

In the case of the real actual Earth we're actually living on, people have known for decades that human population was exceeding the Earth's carrying capacity, and they did all they could to spread this knowledge. But we didn't act to prevent it occurring, we continued to grow far beyond Earth's carrying capacity.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 18:33:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ')In the case of the real actual Earth we're actually living on, people have known for decades that human population was exceeding the Earth's carrying capacity, and they did all they could to spread this knowledge. But we didn't act to prevent it occurring, we continued to grow far beyond Earth's carrying capacity.


Exactly. so much for the special nature of man above all other living things.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby dunewalker » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:13:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', '
')
You are absolutely right Rock. We need the time, but if we don't use that time wisely it will just put us back in the same spot again. We won't get many more, if any, chances to get this right. If the price of oil goes down precipitously, as it very well could, over the next year or so the fear would be that they would squander the time we've bought us. That is one of the flaws of a governmental system like ours....our leaders can't seem to see past the next election cycle to make hard long term decisions. I'm not in any way advocating a change in the system, I just think we all need to somehow make sure they don't forget what is coming.


Snik comes across as one confused puppy. Here he recognizes that we need to wisely use any time left with ample resources, to transition; in another post he ridicules Jimmy Carter for thinking that "we have run out of everything". If the world had listened to Jimmy Carter, we might have half a chance now to adjust to the changes...with a smaller population, of course...
"Wilderness is another civilization apart from our own." - H.D. Thoreau
User avatar
dunewalker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: northern California
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Snik » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:22:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', ' ') Peak Oil is conjecture. We don't know if it's already happened, is happening now, is going to happen soon, or is going to happen on down the line. It's all guesswork until it happens, and it will probably take a few years to know for sure that it has happened when it does.


Conjecture? That oil is finite and will have a production peak is conjecture? :roll:


If you read the rest of the statement I think it was pretty obvious I was talking about when, not if. Rephrase so you won't misunderstand: When Peak Oil is going to happen is conjecture.

Better? Jeezzzz.......
User avatar
Snik
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MrBean » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:27:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ')overshoot belongs in that special category of predictions that has the capacity of turning the proving the prediction wrong by becoming consciouss of the prediction and acting to prevent it taking place as predicted.

So in case of overshoot, by the nature of accusation, jury is out at least untill it's own die off. Doesn't mean that the role of Cassandra presenting the case for overshoot would be unimportant, no, it's crucial.


I guess I'm not entirely sure what point you're making here. Are you saying there is no way to tell if a population is in overshoot until it dies off?

Or are you saying if we knew we might be nearing overshoot, we might have been able to avoid reaching overshoot?

Or both?

In the case of the real actual Earth we're actually living on, people have known for decades that human population was exceeding the Earth's carrying capacity, and they did all they could to spread this knowledge. But we didn't act to prevent it occurring, we continued to grow far beyond Earth's carrying capacity.


Are you yeast on a petridish or a human being? What does human consciousness mean?

A yeast does not eat more sugar than it takes to upkeep vital processes and to reproduce. 'some humans (me included) for some wierd reason that I don't quite understand, consume many times more than what they really need.

A civilization in overshoot with civilized consumption habits does not yet necessarily mean population overshoot - no matter how many times this confusion gets repeated. Point being, neither you nor Monte really understand the consept of overshoot, or if you do just keep misrepresenting it or talking about it inaccurately.

Talking about population overshoot - extra individuals in overshoot - when the real problem is civilization - a misguided way of life - overshoot is a product of individualism and illogic.
User avatar
MrBean
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby Snik » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 19:49:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dunewalker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', '
')
You are absolutely right Rock. We need the time, but if we don't use that time wisely it will just put us back in the same spot again. We won't get many more, if any, chances to get this right. If the price of oil goes down precipitously, as it very well could, over the next year or so the fear would be that they would squander the time we've bought us. That is one of the flaws of a governmental system like ours....our leaders can't seem to see past the next election cycle to make hard long term decisions. I'm not in any way advocating a change in the system, I just think we all need to somehow make sure they don't forget what is coming.


Snik comes across as one confused puppy. Here he recognizes that we need to wisely use any time left with ample resources, to transition; in another post he ridicules Jimmy Carter for thinking that "we have run out of everything". If the world had listened to Jimmy Carter, we might have half a chance now to adjust to the changes...with a smaller population, of course...


And you, sir, have an incomplete or faulty memory. What Jimmy Carter said is that we were about to run out 30 years ago. Not too many people were thinking much about Peak Oil back then. Now, it would have been nice to have begun some kind of real program back then, but there is no way you could have gotten much public support for it. Oil was cheap, and would stay that way for another 30 years.

No confusion here. What he did because we were running out was to outlaw any new natural gas fired generating plants, forcing many utilities to go to coal fired plants for generating electricity. In addition, he put a windfall "profits" tax on oil companies. Neither of these measures did anything to curtail consumption. About the only thing he did do was enact the state and local money raising scheme of 55 mph speed limits. That might have reduced consumption marginally at best.
Last edited by Snik on Wed 23 Jul 2008, 12:56:36, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Snik
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby dunewalker » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 20:09:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Snik', '
')
And you, sir, have an incomplete or faulty memory. What Jimmy Carter said is that we were about to run out 30 years ago.


Here is a you tube of Jimmy Carter's energy speech 0f 1977:

Jimmy Carter's Energy Speech

Too bad we don't have such a leader now...
Last edited by dunewalker on Wed 02 Jul 2008, 20:10:58, edited 1 time in total.
"Wilderness is another civilization apart from our own." - H.D. Thoreau
User avatar
dunewalker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1253
Joined: Thu 30 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: northern California
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 20:09:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ') overshoot is a product of individualism and illogic.


Overshoot is the product of a species coming across a heretofore, inacessible energy/food source wihich causes it's population to bloom (grow exponentially) beyond the sustainable carrying capacity of it's environment until it crashes.

Where did you learn your basic biology?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 20:12:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ') Are you yeast on a petridish or a human being?.


Doesn't matter, now.

Are Humans Smarter Than Yeast?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Lifting the Ban on Off-shore Drilling:The Facts

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 02 Jul 2008, 20:15:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBean', ' ') Point being, neither you nor Monte really understand the consept of overshoot, or if you do just keep misrepresenting it or talking about it inaccurately.


Well, I know a lot of biologists. I worked with many of them in the National Park Service and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. They all have the same "notion" of overshoot as I do.

So do the biology books used to teach it at universities.

So does any google result you can search.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

cron