by slickoil » Sat 21 Jun 2008, 07:40:07
I've seen the JPM report. They are not commodity analysts but economists. However they make a simple and convincing argument that should be taken in line with the IEA's estimates, I think. Essentially, they show that a simple regression model of oil demand growth (percent change in avg bbls per day) explains 85% of the variation in oil demand growth since 1968. The model includes growth in global GDP and the percent change in the spot price of oil. For 2008, the economists note that global GDP growth is projected to slow considerably from a strong, above trend pace of 3.5% in 2007 to a below trend pace of 2.6%. Combined with the 70%(!!) rise in WTI since 2007 (assuming WTI stays are $135/bbl from now through 2009), this model suggests oil demand will contract in 2008 and again (but by less) in 2009. Although oil demand through May has been strong, GDP growth did not slow until 2Q and the the price of oil did not surge until 2Q, so it still seem very plausible for oil demand to contract. It is basic economics, activity slows and price price goes up....demand for oil goes down. The model forecasted almost every move in oil demand over the past 40 years....hard to see whats changed. If anything, the removal of subsidies in emerging markets (e.g. China, Malaysia, India, Indonesia, etc), will only amplify the demand destruction.