by Ex_MislTech » Fri 27 Jun 2008, 06:44:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ex_MislTech', '
')Again thou I will say, while doable it will not happen due
to the prevalent mindset of American society.
Now
I'll try asking the question-
How would that technology make our society sustainable?
After multiple independent peer reviews, and verification of
the process the best solution proven would move forward.
The methods I have mentioned would be scaled up to
use all agri-waste, and human waste for feed stock for
the algae and bacteria.
All 3 plans can use extreme desert lands that are not
used for agriculture, but the wastes can be piped there
much like oil is piped now.
The Deadzone at the mouth of the Mississippi is partially
due to the large amount of waste in the river.
This water could be used in the process and actually help
purify the water over the long term.
This was proposed for the Salton Sea in California by
a brilliant man at the University of New Hampshire.
http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html
Valcent took it a step further though and wants to use
closed loop system to use specialized algae, and to
put it in vertical tubes for more light exposure for
maximum growth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hioZ7C6HLs
Bacteria turning sewage to petroleum could be geared
up in any city with waste treatment.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/e ... 133668.ece
Coskata's could be done in most places around the country.
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1286/
It is doable, but it won't happen anytime soon.
We no longer have the will to make it happen here
on the scale that is required unless someone who
has billions of dollars sees more billions in it, and is
willing to take the risk.
Only once it is a major crisis will they be dragged kicking
and screaming to some kind of solution other than what
the oil lobby has wanted.