[k_semler]

It has been Re-introduced! I have typed even more letters to mail off to representitives, congressmen, and Bush. Little does Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) and Dianne Fienstien (D-CA), realise that the "terrorists and criminals" almost NEVER obtain thier firearms from legitimate sources due to the NICS, and ATF regulations. They also neglect to mention that the AK47 is also CURRENTLY BANNED UNDER CALIFORNIA'S AWB! I guess it is convenient to omit facts when they don't swing your paticular way, (which is way off the cliff, and the rope has been cut). WRITE SHRUB! WRITE CONGRESS! STOCK UP NOW ON "ASSAULT" COMPONENTS!! It is almost time!

[url=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r109:3:./temp/~r109ccUC01::]ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN -- (Senate - March 02, 2005)
[Page: S1928][/url]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote(' The Dishonorable Senator Carl Levin (D-MI)', '
')
Mr. LEVIN. Mr. President, I am pleased to join Senator Feinstein as a cosponsor of her legislation to reauthorize the assault weapons ban. I voted for the original 1994 assault weapons ban and for the amendment to reauthorize the ban in the 108th Congress.

When the 1994 assault weapons ban expired on September 13, 2004, criminals and terrorists gained potential easy access to 19 of the highest powered and most lethal firearms produced. In addition to banning 19 specific weapons, the assault weapons ban also prohibited the sale of semiautomatic weapons that incorporated a detachable magazine and two or more specific military features. These features included folding/telescoping stocks, protruding pistol grips, bayonet mounts, threaded muzzles or flash suppressors, barrel shrouds, or grenade launchers. Common sense tells us that there is no reason for civilians to have easy access to guns with these military style features.

During the 108th Congress, I joined with the majority of my Senate colleagues in adopting an amendment to reauthorize the assault weapons ban for another 10 years. However, the bill to which it was attached was later derailed. Despite the overwhelming support of the law enforcement community, the ongoing threat of terrorism, bipartisan support in the Senate, and the pleas of Americans who have already lost loved ones to assault weapons tragedies, the ban was allowed to expire, as the President and the Republican Congressional leadership were unwilling to act.

Despite the National Rifle Association's assertions that the ban is ineffective, unnecessary, and that guns labeled as assault weapons are rarely used in violent crimes, the need for the assault weapons ban is clear. Just last week, AK-47 assault rifles, like the ones included in the original assault weapons ban, were reportedly used in two separate shootings in Texas and California that left four people dead and four others seriously injured, three of whom were police officers. In Tyler, TX, a gunman armed with an AK-47, wearing a military flak jacket and a bulletproof vest, opened fire outside a courthouse, killing his ex-wife and wounding his son. In the ensuing shootout with police, the gunman was reportedly able to fire as many as 50 rounds at police and innocent bystanders before fleeing in his truck. He was finally shot in another gun battle with police a few miles away. The same day in Los Angeles, a man reportedly armed with an AK-47 walked into his workplace and shot two of his coworkers to death following a dispute. He later turned himself in at a Los Angeles police station.

Unfortunately, assault weapons such as the ones reportedly used in these two shootings as well as many other similar assault weapons are once again being legally produced and sold as a result of the expiration of the assault weapons ban. I again urge my colleagues to act to help prevent tragedies like these by enacting a common sense ban on assault weapons.

[0mar]

I don't think it will pass. The AWB is not even close to effective gun control. I guess I'll have to live without the bayonet lug /sarcasm