by virgincrude » Fri 13 Jun 2008, 01:27:49
ekaggata: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')y the way, although I think the question was raised, in this thread and elsewhere, I never saw any answer as to why these hauliers can't just exert pricing power, and pass on the extra fuel cost to their end consumers..?
These hauliers are members of unions of self-employed workers. Not of large corporations with large fleets. They're mostly truck owners, working for small cooperatives/businesses. There are 'rules' (laws) governing their charges, which prevent them from passing the costs on to the consumer. Gas taxes in Europe are probably the highest in the world, they are striking to get a minimum haulier's charge established as they say they are losing contracts because of drivers willing to undercut their rates: basically they are hauling goods and their costs are not being covered, they're working at a loss.
The Spanish government has flatly said: no way, to this demand, as there are several laws in place governing the functioning of a competitive market making this minimum charge unlawful. The truckers have said; no way, we're staying on strike until we get what we want. that is: a change in the law. (This is all 'official speak, I don't know any truckers to get their first hand views, and there are NO independent news sources in Spain!)
To confound matters, the Spanish fishermen have been on strike until yesterday, over a period of two or three weeks, asking for a 'professional price' for diesel, since the costs of running their boats has cripppled them: the price of fish has not risen according to the price of diesel, and their wages have not risen either. So fishing has become too costly. The idea of a professional rate for diesel seems good to me, but then the next people to demand access to that flat rate, would be taxi drivers/farmers etc. and so all hell would break loose. So contrary to popular view, the truckers and fishermen have not actually been on strike (on the face of it) over the same thing. Although it boils down to the same thing: high priced diesel, in the public awareness, it looks like two different groups with two different beefs.
Zapatero and the socialist government are aware of Peak Oil, his speeches reflect this, although he never uses the term, and their energy policy in their programme for the elections in March makes some good noises: all concentrating on renewables. He shows more awareness for the causes behind the current price hikes than the opposition (although they may simply be callously using this crisis to gain supporters who are PO blind, and just blame it all on Zapatero.)