Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Oil and Inflation Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Inflation Adjusted Oil Prices

Unread postby Pops » Thu 13 Sep 2007, 13:31:52

Don’t forget that the NEW and IMPROVED CPI uses the idea that when steak gets too expensive you will just eat hamburger hence a way low number.

Which is not surprisingly a benefit to the budget since entitlements are linked to the CPI.

All of which of course is an airball because US family budgets today are waay different than 20 or 30 years ago when many folks only had one car and job, actually saved money, paid cash instead of plastic for a much larger percentage of purchases and weren’t in hock for nearly 35% of income on a mortgage.

I don’t really see any way (or need for that matter) to compare except the overall effect on foreclosure or bankruptcy rates.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby btu2012 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 20:51:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', ' ')To be sure governments have abused their sovereignage, but mainly to give their electorate all those goodies they demanded like pensions they have never really paid for, but want anyway. As well as medical insurance that is not really insurance, but a taxpayer give away. Or even that those taxpayers even paid for all that they consumed, but passed along the remaining costs to foreign creditors and/or unborne generations of taxpayers.


Here you touch on one of the real problems we face, namely unsustainable pension and entitlements programs. One can't maintain that in an overpopulated and resource-constrained world.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou can feel pretty crummy about your government mortgaging your future, but your generation is mortgaging your children's future as well. They will pay for your debts and deficits to keep your lifestyle going through inflation and/or lower living standards.


Indeed another real problem: individual savings rates are too low. We have had two narcissistic and irresponsible generations.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t seems to me that many of you are disconnected from reality, and your true place in society or value to society?


Very correct. Unfortunately the whole political debate in modern western societies is based on pure BS. People prefer to stay in denial of the real issues, and politicians grant them their wish.

As to solutions: one must first and foremost reform the tax system (account for social and environmental costs) and the pension/entitlement programs.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby btu2012 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 20:56:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')This is essentially the infamous 'Washington Consensus' that everyone loves to hate. It is self-imposed fiscal discipline, or in the case of the IMF and its aid recipients, externally imposed fiscal discipline.


Nah, it's really a vast conspiracy by the Illuminati globalists to steal our money and enslave our people. :wink:

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby bodigami » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 01:43:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '(')...)
So you that are so grounded in reality. Let us read your predictions in black & white here? What are your solutions? Tell us how we are going to transition to a fossil free future? By cutting back money supply?

First of all that 'comment' alone shows you do not even know where we are much less where we are going? Money supply is not something you can 'arbitrarily' cut back on. Money supply is a function of demand for money and credit as controlled by interest rates set by the Federal Reserve. You raise the cost of money and borrowing and you reduce demand. You cannot simply reduce money supply.

Secondly, demand for money and credit is global. So you can hike US interest rates to 20%, but if investors can still borrow freely at 1% in yen then you have done zero to reduce potential money supply.

Yeesh, I read ill-informed comments all day long here. Posters just expect to be able to say anything, so long as its populist and plays to the crowd. Don't worry if it makes sense. Decoupled from reality indeed.


Stop consumption like there's no tomorrow.
Make money a real asset, backed in something real, not a funny paper.
Change mind and lifestyle to something more sane and healthy.
Do a checklist of fossil fuel dependant products and services and replace them with alternatives or do without.

sure... that's easier said than done, and there's almost no will to change so drasticaly.

(...for some reason I'm thinking of homer simpsons singing he's the elf of happyness)
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Top

1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART (Base + Inflation)

Unread postby Hagakure_Leofman » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 07:47:32

Image

Image

Enjoy :-D

EDIT : On request, here is a rough chart showing the same data adjusted for inflation. I could only find a chart going to December 2007, so I've done a rough edit on this and extended the graph to show our current summit.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 04 Mar 2009, 13:18:18, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Oil and Inflation Thread.
User avatar
Hagakure_Leofman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed 02 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: out dispatching ronan...

Re: From 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART

Unread postby cipi604 » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 12:38:53

It's still very very cheap. The graph in a few years will look like a hockey stick.
User avatar
cipi604
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue 14 Aug 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: From 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 13:02:03

I would prefer it to be inflation adjusted.
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: From 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 13:41:03

I was thinking the same thing.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: From 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 13:52:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mgibbons19', 'I') would prefer it to be inflation adjusted.


Me too. But that tends to be where the chart starts to become less trustworthy, since the formula used to adjust for inflation can easily make it seem as though the runup in price is not as severe as it really is. There are just too many parties who would like to make it seem as though oil prices during the 1970s oil crisis will always have been worse than today no matter how bad things get.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: From 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 14:38:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'M')e too. But that tends to be where the chart starts to become less trustworthy, since the formula used to adjust for inflation can easily make it seem as though the runup in price is not as severe as it really is. There are just too many parties who would like to make it seem as though oil prices during the 1970s oil crisis will always have been worse than today no matter how bad things get.


That's true. Maybe we should look at the oil price in gold instead:

1973 - 7.3 bbl/oz
Today - 6.65 bbl/oz

Or something like that.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: 1970s to the Present : Price of Oil CHART (Base + Inflat

Unread postby Hagakure_Leofman » Mon 09 Jun 2008, 16:46:13

Bump.

I've added a chart adjusted for inflation to my original post above.... I had to modify it slightly as it only went to Dec 2007.
User avatar
Hagakure_Leofman
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed 02 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: out dispatching ronan...

PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation"

Unread postby idiom » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 04:56:34

If food or Oil are becoming more difficult to produce then their value is going up. If the price adjusts to match that value then that is not inflation.

Inflation is an increase in the money supply (which is happening hand over fist too.)

However people are being told not that prices are going up because of PO and that everything is becoming more valuable, but that inflation is causing it. Thus Peak Oil and its world crushing implications are being masked.

The message people are not hearing is:

"The Price of Oil is NOT inflating. It is getting HARDER TO COME BY. The Price of Food is not inflating, it is getting HARDER TO COME BY."
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&quo

Unread postby Olle » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 05:20:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('idiom', 'I')f food or Oil are becoming more difficult to produce then their value is going up. If the price adjusts to match that value then that is not inflation.

Inflation is an increase in the money supply (which is happening hand over fist too.)

However people are being told not that prices are going up because of PO and that everything is becoming more valuable, but that inflation is causing it. Thus Peak Oil and its world crushing implications are being masked.

The message people are not hearing is:

"The Price of Oil is NOT inflating. It is getting HARDER TO COME BY. The Price of Food is not inflating, it is getting HARDER TO COME BY."


Half correct, and that is why the Fed measure "Core inflation" were food and energy is taken out.

Make no mistake though, the rise in cost for fuel and food could lead to “real inflation”, since people and companies search for compensation. Higher prices and higher salaries, which leads to even higher prices and even higher salaries and so on.
The commodity boom might set of a dangerous inflation and the Fed is to react to possible inflation expectations, and the risk for dangerous inflation has absolutely gone up.
Me Tar sands, you Jane
User avatar
Olle
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed 28 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Sweden
Top

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&

Unread postby chenopodium » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 05:58:21

The problem is that not only food and oil will go up, but almost anything else too because of PO (steel, iron, plastic products, fertilizer... you name it!). The main thing that won't go up because of PO is salaries.

I agree that this could cause "money" inflation at the end, but I think it is very important to distinguish the two.

The fed and other governments are likely to increase interest rates because they think this is all "regular" money inflation.

So I wonder if increasing interest rate would help.
It would only help to stem "money" inflation, but it will have no impact on "PO inflation".

What will happen if they increase interest rates, and "PO inflation" keeps going up (and they think this is "money inflation")? Will they keep increasing interest rates, further hurting everyone?

Assuming for a moment that we are able to stop money inflation and only have "PO inflation", then nothing will help - in fact in my opinion they may have to reduce interest rates to basically 0 once the growth paradigm falls apart.... otherwise nobody will be able to afford loans anymore.

(As a side question: why in the world is food and energy taken out of the core inflation??? To me energy and food are the most important parts. Do they know that PO will lead to increasing food/energy costs and is that why it is taken out???)
User avatar
chenopodium
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&quo

Unread postby Micki » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 06:13:27

Easing interest rates certainly wouldn't help.
If oil price (and cost of anything related) increases becasue of shortage, then increasing money supply can only make it worse as more money chases the same amount of goods.
No doubt some countries will decrease interest rates but that will be more of an attempt to keep people from rioting.
Micki
 

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&quo

Unread postby chenopodium » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 06:27:26

I'm thinking of all the people who have mortgages.

In a "PO inflation" scenario, everything (except salaries) gets more expensive, and people have less money available for everything, including paying the mortgage.

So given the same interest rates, more people will default and foreclose.

Increasing interest rates would make this even worse.

Only lowering interest rates would help in this case (as long as this doesn't increase the money supply... and cause "money inflation").
User avatar
chenopodium
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&

Unread postby idiom » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 07:04:07

What I mean is that people are not catching the idea that the Loaf of Bread today is NOT the same Loaf of bread as four years ago. It is harder to make it now than it was four years ago.

The CPI based on a basket of goods is not taking Peak Oil into account. The REAL value of the items in the CPI is going up. Its not meant to. The whole index is being thrown off by PO.
User avatar
idiom
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 672
Joined: Mon 23 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&quo

Unread postby chenopodium » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 07:08:30

I wonder if there is a better way to compute "money" inflation.

Something like total amount of a currency divided by the number of people...

Or maybe we should just look at salaries to compute inflation, as they won't increase because of PO

Any other ideas :-)?
User avatar
chenopodium
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 29
Joined: Sat 07 Jun 2008, 03:00:00

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&

Unread postby Olle » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 07:53:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('chenopodium', 'I') wonder if there is a better way to compute "money" inflation.

Something like total amount of a currency divided by the number of people...

Or maybe we should just look at salaries to compute inflation, as they won't increase because of PO

Any other ideas :-)?


Inflation in itself is not necessarily dangerous to the economy, only spiralling inflation is. That is why the Fed measure core inflation without the volatile commodities of food and energy.
This is a good article that explains it all: http://www.economist.com/finance/displa ... d=11622353
Me Tar sands, you Jane
User avatar
Olle
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed 28 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Sweden
Top

Re: PO Value increases being mis-labeled "inflation&quo

Unread postby Micki » Thu 17 Jul 2008, 09:51:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')nflation in itself is not necessarily dangerous to the economy, only spiralling inflation is. That is why the Fed measure core inflation without the volatile commodities of food and energy.
This is a good article that explains it all: http://www.economist.com/finance/displa ... d=11622353


And if that still comes out too high, they use substitution and then hedonic adjustments.

Call it what ever you want, measure how you want. The fact is, if you increase the amount of money, it will go into "things".

If you lower interst rates, your loan repayments go down, but everything else goes up. It is however preferable to home owners as it helps retain some value in the property and the increased living cost burden is shared also with people who don't have homeloans. (i.e. also people who don't get to benefit from lower interest will have to take share in the cost of such a move.)
Micki
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron