Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Drill in ANWR?

Poll ended at Mon 13 Sep 2004, 18:58:32

Yes, we now have the technology to do it cleanly
4
No votes
Yes, we need the oil, and nobody goes there anyway
3
No votes
Yes, it will rape the land but we need the oil
4
No votes
No, if ANWR opens up, all the national parks are at risk
1
No votes
No, this is one of the last great wildernesses
9
No votes
No, bring on peak oil
8
No votes
 
Total votes : 29

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:07:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', 'A')re you saying we should use up all of our oil now to sustain our current wasteful way of life?

Of course not.
I'm supportive of Roscoe Bartlett's plan to drill ANWR and use the proceeds to develop alternative energy to replace oil.
Do you really think all the oil in the US is in ANWR? If so, you are wrong.
I doubt that even you actually believe your own inaccurate rhetoric (i.e. "use up all our oil now"... "burn up the whole earth"). :)
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby cube » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:07:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'W')hy do you need Anwr to do what private industry could easily do, without it. What a disingenuous piece of nonsense that is.

It depends what you mean by "could easily do".
If you mean a drop in replacement for crude oil there is absolutely NOTHING out there that even comes close to what oil can do....and there never will be. The closest thing out there would be nuclear power + lead acid EV cars. People are just going to have to accept the fact that it's downhill from here on out.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby cube » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:17:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', 'A')ll of the alternatives will require fossil fuels to maintain and run.
If it requires oil then it's not really an "alternative" is it? 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:22:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peleg', 'p')eak oil cannot be avoided. The United States will fall within two decades never to rise again as it is currently known.

Roscoe Bartlett has for years been the only member of Congress smart enough to recognize the danger of peak oil. Now he is proposing a program to fight and work to overcome that serious problem.
Peak oil is a very serious problem, but there are lots of people who aren't ready to give up just yet. The sooner we get started on alternative energy and economic restructuring in the US the better.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Iaato » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:24:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')'m supportive of Roscoe Bartlett's plan to drill ANWR and use the proceeds to develop alternative energy to replace oil.

Is it better to use the Arctic Refuge oil to fuel our current way of life, or is it better to use the energy that we would gain from reducing waste to develop alternatives.
Simple question, PA, answer it.
PStarr, intelligence is not necessarily correlated with ethics. Bartlett has just revealed himself as another politician focused on the short term and "getting mine."
“Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value ---- zero.” --Voltaire
User avatar
Iaato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: As close as I can get to the beginning of the pipe.
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:35:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'I')'m supportive of Roscoe Bartlett's plan to drill ANWR and use the proceeds to develop alternative energy to replace oil.

Is it better to use the Arctic Refuge oil to fuel our current way of life, or is it better to use the energy that we would gain from reducing waste to develop alternatives. Simple question, PA, answer it.

Your question is nonsensical.
Is this what you are trying to ask?
Roscoe Bartlett proposes to use the money from ANWR to develop energy alternatives.
You are proposing to use "energy" (I assume you mean money) gained (I assume you mean saved) from reducing waste to develop alternatives.

But any savings from reducing waste is distributed across the economy and is not available for alternative energy research, unless new taxes are imposed on middle class folks.
Obviously, ANWR is much better way to fund alternative energy research. It will provide much more money for alternative energy by leasing fees and taxes on Big Oil, and will do so without raising taxes on the middle class. In addition, it would stimulate the economy and create high paying technical and construction jobs.
Roscoe Bartlett is a very smart guy. His new proposal shows it again.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Iaato » Fri 23 May 2008, 14:51:12

PA, if you look at human nature and the history of US politics closely, you realize that both options we describe would be used wastefully to maintain and grow the current way of life, no matter what the original premise for the law was. A populace desperate for gasoline will not allow that Arctic oil to be funneled into research.

Using the energy from reducing waste to adapt our way of life will come naturally; people who can't drive anymore will bike or use mass transit, and so on. Adding fuel to the fire now by drilling arctic inhibits that adaptation.
“Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value ---- zero.” --Voltaire
User avatar
Iaato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: As close as I can get to the beginning of the pipe.

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Plantagenet » Fri 23 May 2008, 15:03:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', 'A') populace desperate for gasoline will not allow that Arctic oil to be funneled into research.

You don't get it. The oil doesn't go to research. The MONEY goes to research.
Bartlett's bill would direct and dedicate the tens of billions of dollars in new, additional federal tax MONEY obtained from leasing and taxing ANWR to research on alternative energy.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby cube » Fri 23 May 2008, 19:45:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', '.')..We do not need research on wind and solar. We know they work. We need to subsidize their installation with tax and government programs. ...

and these subsidies will be paid for by an economy that was made possible by oil.
This is why I always laugh at all the "enlightened" liberals who think that taxing gasoline to pay for electric trains is smart. ANYTHING (even if it doesn't run on oil) that became financially possible only because of oil will collapse once the oil money dries up. NO amount of solar, wind, public transit can save us. That's why they call it die-off. :twisted:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby sicophiliac » Fri 23 May 2008, 21:01:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'Y')ou have been here long enough PA to understand what is going on here. I am surprised you have leaned so little. We do not need research on wind and solar. We know they work. We need to subsidize their installation with tax and government programs. We need to create an electric infrastructure including long-haul freight train lines, intercity passager systems, and local public transport. This works. We do not need research on biofuel gimmicks. They have already failed. We do not need research on CTL, tar sands, shale, THAI, SAGH, or super deep water. They barely work and are a waste of money and time. We need to powerdown now and stop feeding the consumer frenzy. now. We certainly do not need to tie research into a boondoggles. The 10 billion possible barrels in ANWAR are good for a few years. THEN WHAT? Do it now or STFU. And stop handing out public money and lands to oil companies.

The powerdown will happen regardless of ANWR, the oil will come online strong when we are well past global peak( around 2020) so I see this as a way to soften the landing so to speak. It wont be for people to go buy more hummers and go on road trips, that extra oil will have to be used for vital services, shipping food, medicine other basic necessities etc... Can you really honestly say that investing in R&D in alternative energy would be a total waste of money? No more advancements to be had?
User avatar
sicophiliac
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 435
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: san jose CA
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Peleg » Fri 23 May 2008, 21:19:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peleg', 'p')eak oil cannot be avoided. The United States will fall within two decades never to rise again as it is currently known.
Roscoe Bartlett has for years been the only member of Congress smart enough to recognize the danger of peak oil. Now he is proposing a program to fight and work to overcome that serious problem. Peak oil is a very serious problem, but there are lots of people who aren't ready to give up just yet. The sooner we get started on alternative energy and economic restructuring in the US the better.

Absolutely. Opening ANWR is nothing but a profit sharing plan for a few oil execs and some legislators. It would not generate enough fees to make a difference, most of the profits would go right into the pockets of those who have bilked the people for years and it would'nt come on line for years.

Not to mention the fact that alternatives will never replace the scale and EROEI of light sweet crude. It's that simple. So playing this game and saying that well we need ANWR to help fund alternatives is just another oil grab. The fact that Roscoe would involve himself is the shicking part, the idea is just as stupid no matter who puts it forth.

These people play on the fact that the average person will never be able to simultaneously capture scale, time rate of change, relative scale and supply and demand at the same moment. When they add to this the funky numbers they all start tossing out when they see what they want. People don't know what to think. Flip a coin.
I think more highly of Roscoe then to call him greedy, but certainly most people who want ANWR are motivated by avarice, plain and simple.
User avatar
Peleg
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 238
Joined: Tue 20 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Use ANWR to fund alternative energy research

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 24 May 2008, 00:17:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peleg', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'P')eak oil is a very serious problem, but there are lots of people who aren't ready to give up just yet. The sooner we get started on alternative energy and economic restructuring in the US the better.

Opening ANWR is nothing but a profit sharing plan for a few oil execs and some legislators. It would not generate enough fees to make a difference

You don't know what you are talking about.
The leasing fees and subsequent taxes on ANWR oil production would generate an estimated 200 billion dollars for alternative energy research. :)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Oil in ANWAR?

Unread postby doodlebug2 » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 14:56:39

{thread merged by moderator}
If possible, please explain why the reason for drilling in Anwar WILL or WILL NOT alleviate the current supply problems. Even today, D. Cheney was saying problem solved if we drill in ANWAR. I read recently that it would drop maybe 75cents a barrel, at 129$ a barrel, BFD. It seems that whomever you listen to or read has opinion, they all can't be correct. Right?
Why not let Oil Comps drill, and when it doesn't solve the problem, it is then proven that the problem is bigger than that. If oil is then coming out of our ears after Anwar, that group can have their proof. I am at the point of whom to believe. I am not for drilling there, but I just am tired of listening and getting different answers from different groups.
I would like to get facts to make my mind up. Thanks
User avatar
doodlebug2
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Oil in ANWAR?

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 15:22:42

The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; The Last Nail in the Co

Unread postby Lore » Tue 03 Jun 2008, 23:06:49

Drilling in ANWR and off the Gulf Coast is chemotherapy for a dying patient. It only helps to prolong life for a brief while, giving the illusion that everything is alright and its business as usual.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

When do Democrats allow ANWR and/or new off-shore drilling?

Unread postby ProudFossil » Thu 19 Jun 2008, 08:55:48

When do Democrats allow ANWR and/or new off-shore drilling?
at $5.00 a gallon for gas?
at $6.00 a gallon for gas?
at $7.00 a gallon for gas?
never
User avatar
ProudFossil
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests