Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

new curve

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Unread postby azur » Sun 27 Feb 2005, 17:01:02

Another thought.

You should not be surprised at the $10/bbl figure. Most offshore fields are only sanctioned for development if they can show an acceptable return at an oil price of $18 to $20/bbl. This number has slowly crept up over the past few years, but oil companies are notoriously conservative in this area.

The cost of development and production has nothing to do with the market price of oil, which is totally driven by supply and demand. Post PO when oil hits $100/bbl, it will still cost $10/bbl to produce in deep offshore (and much less onshore).

The only way out of this is to break the supply/demand equation by securing a dedicated supply sufficient to meet a countries demand, and bypass the international oil market. For example, if the US was to secure supplies from Iraq, Iran and Saudi they could dicatate their own internal sales price, oustide of the chaos in the rest of the marketplace....

Maybe Cheney already thought of that one?
azur
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon 10 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby maverickdoc » Sun 27 Feb 2005, 17:17:59

Azur very interesting point, would the rest of the world let the US get away with that?
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby azur » Sun 27 Feb 2005, 18:03:42

Mav,

If it is dressed up a spreading freedom, ridding the world of nuclear terrorist threats and liberating opressed people, maybe they could get away with it like the last time (remember the WMD scam which netted 110 GB?).

Who exactly would stop the US? The UK would tag along again to get a % cut of the spoils. Russia has enough of her own reserves for now. China has seen this coming and is already trying to line up Plan B. The rest of Europe would of course bitch and be ignored like last time.

Synical I know, but it could happen.
azur
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon 10 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Interlink.

Unread postby EnviroEngr » Sun 27 Feb 2005, 19:52:03

-------------------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
-------------------------------------------
(---------< Temet Nosce >---------)
__________________________
User avatar
EnviroEngr
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin

Unread postby SpasticDancer » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 17:20:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('azur', 'T')he cost of development and production has nothing to do with the market price of oil, which is totally driven by supply and demand. Post PO when oil hits $100/bbl, it will still cost $10/bbl to produce in deep offshore (and much less onshore).

The only way out of this is to break the supply/demand equation by securing a dedicated supply sufficient to meet a countries demand, and bypass the international oil market. For example, if the US was to secure supplies from Iraq, Iran and Saudi they could dicatate their own internal sales price, oustide of the chaos in the rest of the marketplace....


Oh man, can you imagine the tremendousness of the financial incentive to buy oil at the internal price and sell it at the external one in such a system?! :o Good lord, the thought makes me almost giddy! :lol: :lol: :twisted:
User avatar
SpasticDancer
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu 20 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Unread postby pup55 » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 22:00:38

ee:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Have you seen this: http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic5305.html
_________________


I had not seen this but this is quite well done. Thanks for the post.

The weak link in the analysis seems to be the assumption of a mere 1 mbpd growth between now and 2007. If it's more like 3% like the global economy is supposed to grow, this could get more interesting.

It would be interesting to be able to track how these startups are doing. I will print this out and save it for tracking later.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Excel Model

Unread postby ECM » Fri 04 Mar 2005, 00:38:57

I have created a model using an Excel spreadsheet and these are the numbers I come up with using different scenarios.

I started all the charts at 1 GB/Year during year 1 production and used varying rates of growth and decline. These charts assume a perfect bell curve.


Scenario 1
First year growth is 10%
Growth declines at 0.144%/Year

Total Production is 2021 GB
Peak Production of 30.3 GB/Year
Peak year = 71.0
50% of peak production = Year 102 (31 years for first halving)
25% of peak production = Year 115 (13 years for second halving)


Scenario 2
First year growth is 12%
Growth declines at 0.207%/Year

Total Production is 1680 GB
Peak Production of 30.13 GB/Year
Peak year = 59.5
50% of peak production = Year 85.5 (26 years for first halving)
25% of peak production = Year 96.5 (11 years for second halving)


Scenario 3
First year growth is 9%
Growth declines at 0.117%/Year

Total Production is 2230 GB
Peak Production of 30.15 GB/Year
Peak year = 78.5
50% of peak production = Year 113 (34.5 years for first halving)
25% of peak production = Year 127.5 (14.5 years for second halving)


Certain trends are noticed:
Every year the decline as a % of prior year production increases.
The time to lose an additional half of current production decreases with each halving. This is consistent with the prior statement.
Gross production declines increase every year until about 60% of peak production is reached.

Considering the oil embargo effects it is highly likely that our ultimate peak will be less than we could have achieved and that we will hit Peak Oil past the original halfway point.

{touched up for at-a-glance reading; EE}
User avatar
ECM
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

ECM

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Fri 04 Mar 2005, 07:12:59

Can you post these curves? Interesting results.


Particularly, $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')onsidering the oil embargo effects it is highly likely that our ultimate peak will be less than we could have achieved and that we will hit Peak Oil past the original halfway point.


The part about hitting peak past the original halfway point.
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Previous

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron