Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Know BEFORE You Post

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 16:05:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KillTheHumans', '
')
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '
')
I started a thread, Do You Work in the Oil Industry. Very few people actually work in the industry.


Actually, LOTS of people work in the industry, they just don't hang out here.


Thanks for catching that. I meant to say "Very few people here actually work in the industry". I know there are thousands of people that work in the O&G industry.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 16:15:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('HEADER_RACK', '
') We found more oil in the 60's than we ever have and that was before 3d surveying.


Thank you Captain Obvious.

My wife calls me that all the time so no hard feelings meant. :)

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 20 May 2008, 16:25:34

Very few people are willing to both post enough identifying information about themselves to honestly qualify themselves as an expert, while simultaneously continuing casual conversations on PO.com...

I can only see such a pair up of circumstances in the case of someone who works in the industry, but is primarily motivated by the sale of books that they have some interest in.

In the end, its up to the reader to discern bunk and speculation from hard information, as it always is on the internet.

nb... anyone that lives in oil producing areas knows that companies are falling all over themselves trying to produce every last little dribble of oil that they can at these prices. These are guys that have gone through hideous falls in price; its likely they can't make themselves believe that the only future is up.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 20 May 2008, 16:33:45

Aaron, Do a quick cost benefit analysis and determine for yourself if many oil producers really have that much to gain by exploring, if they're already making big bucks. If the price drops, for whatever reason, they may not recoup much of a yield on their money. If the price remains stable or goes up, they are sure to run into demand destruction and some real competition from alternatives.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 20 May 2008, 16:36:15

Joel Trout, The problem with any kind of "expert" opinion, is the subject of reserve capacity in many of the Opec nations isn't transparent. The doomers on this forum, could be wildly optimistic for all anyone knows.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 20 May 2008, 17:58:31

Joel - I noticed/wondered about rdsnt's reply too. I'm guessing that you'd agree with what Deffeyes said in Hubbert's Peak, that you really need to drill a test hole to really know what's down there, and that statistically speaking, after a few dry holes, it's best to give up, given how much money you've spent. Probably this goes without saying but thought I'd bring it up anyway, if only to make another lame appeal to authority.

We used to get the occasional post from WebHubbleTelescope, who's a hardcore stats guy. You might want to dig up some of his posts if you want to really give the noggin a workout. Used to be more industry types here as well; hope they make a comeback.

I have read the Prize - Yergin is a helluva historian if nothing else! I've noticed the "Nontechnical" books from Pennwell before, but balked at the price, which hovers around $50, so hafta be content with Deffeyes and what I can dig up on the web, being an armchair geologist. There are some intriguing scans of old petroleum geology titles on Google Books, too.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby TheDude » Tue 20 May 2008, 18:00:36

The USGS has the National Oil and Gas Assessment (NOGA) too, if you want to mull over what's been covered.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 18:37:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'J')oel - I noticed/wondered about rdsnt's reply too. I'm guessing that you'd agree with what Deffeyes said in Hubbert's Peak, that you really need to drill a test hole to really know what's down there, and that statistically speaking, after a few dry holes, it's best to give up, given how much money you've spent. Probably this goes without saying but thought I'd bring it up anyway, if only to make another lame appeal to authority.



I agree to an extent. We now realize that we are not going to find new large oil fields. We are however finding smaller and smaller pools that are very economic at these prices.

Without 3-d seismic many areas would be considered depleted or dry. Here in California we are seeing companies leasing and drilling areas that have many dryholes and/or historical production that has been abandoned.

For Example:

Open this Map of the Helm Field in Fresno County from the CA Dept of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal. Zoom in on Section 15 Township 17 South Range 18 East. Notice all the abandoned wells. Here you can look at production of a new well there in Sec 15. Its not going to solve our peak oil issue but it shows that there is still oil in an area that has been explored and drilled since the 1940s. This well produced 25,627 barrels of oil in 2007 and at today's prices that is a little over $3.3 million in revenue from an area with numerous abandoned wells.

Right now some of the best places to explore are areas that had 2-d seismic shot, wells drilled, and then was abandoned. Companies can lease the area, shoot 3-d seismic, find the smaller pockets of oil, and then drill precisely to those areas.

They are not finding a huge amount of oil but they are definitely finding in oil in areas that have been "explored" for the last 40 years. Many of our properties literally have 40+ years of leasing/drilling activity. Just because one company didn't find anything doesn't mean another company can't find oil.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 20 May 2008, 18:43:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'J')oel - I noticed/wondered about rdsnt's reply too. I'm guessing that you'd agree with what Deffeyes said in Hubbert's Peak, that you really need to drill a test hole to really know what's down there, and that statistically speaking, after a few dry holes, it's best to give up, given how much money you've spent. Probably this goes without saying but thought I'd bring it up anyway, if only to make another lame appeal to authority.



I agree to an extent. We now realize that we are not going to find new large oil fields. We are however finding smaller and smaller pools that are very economic at these prices.

Without 3-d seismic many areas would be considered depleted or dry. Here in California we are seeing companies leasing and drilling areas that have many dryholes and/or historical production that has been abandoned.

For Example:

Open this Map of the Helm Field in Fresno County from the CA Dept of Oil, Gas, & Geothermal. Zoom in on Section 15 Township 17 South Range 18 East. Notice all the abandoned wells. Here you can look at production of a new well there in Sec 15. Its not going to solve our peak oil issue but it shows that there is still oil in an area that has been explored and drilled since the 1940s. This well produced 25,627 barrels of oil in 2007 and at today's prices that is a little over $3.3 million in revenue from an area with numerous abandoned wells.

Right now some of the best places to explore are areas that had 2-d seismic shot, wells drilled, and then was abandoned. Companies can lease the area, shoot 3-d seismic, find the smaller pockets of oil, and then drill precisely to those areas.

They are not finding a huge amount of oil but they are definitely finding in oil in areas that have been "explored" for the last 40 years. Many of our properties literally have 40+ years of leasing/drilling activity. Just because one company didn't find anything doesn't mean another company can't find oil.

joeltrout


I would imagine this same kind of thing is going on in west Texas.

Anyone know more about what's going on in that area right now (other than putting up those hideous windmills)?
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 18:52:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
I would imagine this same kind of thing is going on in west Texas.



It is happening all over the US. The 1st commerical oil well in Los Angeles County (Pico Canyon) was drilled in 1875. Today we are still drilling in Los Angeles County and finding new reserves of oil every year.

Again this isn't going to solve our problem of peak oil because the finds are tiny compared to large fields. But new fields/pools are being found on a daily basis all over.

The company I work for has owned our minerals since the 1920s & 30s. We are still seeing a ton of exploration on minerals that have been leased 30 times by companies big and small over the last 80 years. Still companies are able to find new discoveries due to technology.

And many of our minerals that have never been leased in 80 years are now being leased and shot with 3-d seismic and commerical wells are being drilled.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 20 May 2008, 18:56:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
I would imagine this same kind of thing is going on in west Texas.



It is happening all over the US. The 1st commerical oil well in Los Angeles County (Pico Canyon) was drilled in 1875. Today we are still drilling in Los Angeles County and finding new reserves of oil every year.

Again this isn't going to solve our problem of peak oil because the finds are tiny compared to large fields. But new fields/pools are being found on a daily basis all over.

The company I work for has owned our minerals since the 1920s & 30s. We are still seeing a ton of exploration on minerals that have been leased 30 times by companies big and small over the last 80 years. Still companies are able to find new discoveries due to technology.

And many of our minerals that have never been leased in 80 years are now being leased and shot with 3-d seismic and commerical wells are being drilled.

joeltrout


Sort of the energy equivalent of the guy pushing the shopping cart down the road collecting aluminum cans?

(Sorry, couldn't resist. :-D )
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Tue 20 May 2008, 19:32:06

OK I'll weigh in here. Historically the first large discoveries were all made in a time where there was no seismic or the technology was such that all we got was 100 fold data. Such was the case at Spindletop, arguably the first major discovery in the US and also Ghawar which was drilled on top of a surface exposure of an anticline. Of course you have to drill to find the oil, there is no "remote viewing" of any category that can tell us indirectly if there is oil in a particular structure or not. Seismic capabilites have gone through a number of major advancements. In the seventies we saw 2D seismic with much greater fold, up to 24 fold which by the mid eighties was getting as high as 64 fold and in some cases 128 fold. The fold improves the quality of the seismic image, more subtle traps require higher fold. Another improvement was 3D seismic which we first saw used to any extent in the eighties with great improvements in the late eighties and nineties mainly in the area of acquisition (rather than dynamite, vibroseis trucks were used). There has also been a considerable improvement in signal acqusition (telemetry systems became de riguer in the nineties) and signal processing (prestacked time and depth migrations improve the seismic image in deformed terranes considerably; seismic inversion and processing for amplitudes or acoustic impedance can be direct indicators of porosity and sometime hydrocarbon).
The problem with 3D is it is immensely expensive. Dependant on what detail of data you wish to acquire the cost can run anywhere from $20,000 to $50,000 /km2. So a 200 km2 survery could cost as much as $10 MM. Now if the size of the prize is big then it makes 3D well worthwhile. But if you don't even know there is a subsurface trap present spending $10MM up front becomes an incrediably risky venture. That is why up until not that long ago 3D was mainly used after a discovery had been made as an appraisal tool. More recently 3D is used as an exploratory tool but almost never before a reasonable amount of 2D is acquired, enough to identify potential traps and hence limit the amount of 3D needed.
3D is a great tool but it isn't a panacea. It helps us identify potential traps but it does not (usually) guaranty us that there is porous reservoir in the trap nor that there is source rock present nor that oil generated has moved from the source rock to the reservoir in the trap. As a consequence there are a number of other tools which are used including surface geochemical sampling (the goretex folks are big in this), rockeval analysis of potential source rocks, basin modeling, fluid migration modeling, aeromag (yes we do use it sometimes in conjunction with other information) aero or surface gravity, EM (electromagnetic) studies, radar, remote sensing for analysis of plant types (often indicates subsurface seeps of hydrocarbons) and the list goes on. Basically we use what makes the most sense from a cost/information standpoint. In some cases where drilling costs are relatively small in comparison to the cost of seismic the decision might even be made to drill a well instead of acquiring seismic. Just because 3D was not shot it doesn't mean there is great potential in the subsurface, it might have been ruled out through other means (i.e. no source rock, not deep enough burial, no reservoir etc).
Threadbears comment on why oil companies would continue to explore.....quite simple, they all have limited resources. If you look at most companies their reserve life is in the 10 year range. But that refers to total reserve life. In order to keep production flat, let alone grow it requires that exploration or acquisition continue. Most companies have been pretty good at replacing their production year on year, including the majors. This is no small feet given the amount of production that some of the bigger players have. Most of the oil companies are publically traded, there is no way they would be rewarded by the market for a strategy that just produces everything they have in a blow down mode. The pressure would be on from investors to have them sell their company.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Tue 20 May 2008, 19:33:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '[')This well produced 25,627 barrels of oil in 2007 and at today's prices that is a little over $3.3 million in revenue from an area with numerous abandoned wells.


Yes, I know you acknowleged that these wells weren't going to solve anything, but I thought this quote deserved a second chuckle.

If there really are any cornucopians left on this board, they should pay close attention to this quote. This is those "billions of barrels of untapped reserves" heroes like Yergen keep talking about. millions of wells...just...like...this.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 19:46:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '
')
Yes, I know you acknowleged that these wells weren't going to solve anything, but I thought this quote deserved a second chuckle.

If there really are any cornucopians left on this board, they should pay close attention to this quote. This is those "billions of barrels of untapped reserves" heroes like Yergen keep talking about. millions of wells...just...like...this.


The US production of oil is estimated at 1 out of every 6 barrels of oil produced comes from a stripper well. And almost 78% of the wells in the US are considered stripper wells.

Stripper wells generally produce less than 10 barrels of oil a day.

Thats a scary thought when you start thinking of Saudi Arabia and Russian oil wells turning into stripper wells in the next 10-15 years.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby BigTex » Tue 20 May 2008, 19:56:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '
')
Yes, I know you acknowleged that these wells weren't going to solve anything, but I thought this quote deserved a second chuckle.

If there really are any cornucopians left on this board, they should pay close attention to this quote. This is those "billions of barrels of untapped reserves" heroes like Yergen keep talking about. millions of wells...just...like...this.


The US production of oil is estimated at 1 out of every 6 barrels of oil produced comes from a stripper well. And almost 78% of the wells in the US are considered stripper wells.

Stripper wells generally produce less than 10 barrels of oil a day.

Thats a scary thought when you start thinking of Saudi Arabia and Russian oil wells turning into stripper wells in the next 10-15 years.

joeltrout


Is the quality of the oil coming from a stripper well similar to the quality of the oil that came out of the well when it was younger (generally speaking)?

If you graphed the production of a single well, what would a typical curve look like over several decades? In other, words, when does the "long tail" (i.e., the 10 barrels a day segment) begin to appear (assuming it is economical to continue pumping it)?

Something tells me we won't be seeing deepwater stripper wells.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby joeltrout » Tue 20 May 2008, 20:22:33

RocDoc will be knowledgeable on the technical aspects but I will share what I have seen both here in California and western Permian Basin.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
Is the quality of the oil coming from a stripper well similar to the quality of the oil that came out of the well when it was younger (generally speaking)?
The quality is generally the same because it is the same oil. The reason it turns into a stripper well is because of loss of reservoir pressure due to pumping out the oil and any associated natural gas and/or water.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')If you graphed the production of a single well, what would a typical curve look like over several decades? In other, words, when does the "long tail" (i.e., the 10 barrels a day segment) begin to appear (assuming it is economical to continue pumping it)?
That would depend on several things and I am definitely not a petroleum geologist or reservoir engineer.

I have seen several huge variations. Some wells turn into stripper wells in a matter of months and others hold their flow rates for several years. It depends on many factors such as reservoir size, pressure, water production, etc... none of which I know much about.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')Something tells me we won't be seeing deepwater stripper wells.


Mostly likely not due to costs. A well here in Los Angeles has relatively no overhead costs whereas a huge offshore rig has hundreds of thousands of dollars in overhead costs in a year no matter if that well is producing 30,000 barrels/day or 30 barrels/day.

If someone had the information it would be easy to figure out what the economic limits are for the offshore wells. Our company obviously doesn't have any offshore interest.

joeltrout
joeltrout
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1297
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby KillTheHumans » Tue 20 May 2008, 22:05:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('joeltrout', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')
I would imagine this same kind of thing is going on in west Texas.



It is happening all over the US. The 1st commerical oil well in Los Angeles County (Pico Canyon) was drilled in 1875. Today we are still drilling in Los Angeles County and finding new reserves of oil every year.


Hundreds...of millions....of barrels....each year. Those little dribbles sure add up!
Freddy RULZ!

www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits) (or bankers) (or web "experts")
User avatar
KillTheHumans
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Rockies
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby jato » Tue 20 May 2008, 23:17:39

They sure do! But it still hasn't stopped the US from peaking. Oh wait, I can't comment because I am not in the oil industry.
jato
 

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby Aaron » Tue 20 May 2008, 23:39:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ot all sources are internet articles.


Fair enough... are any of them published on the Internet?

I'm waiting...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Know BEFORE You Post

Unread postby Aaron » Tue 20 May 2008, 23:40:45

Great to see you rockdoc123.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

cron