Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Hummer/SUV Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 10 May 2008, 22:49:22

Seems to me $15 hour down South is pretty dang good money?
vision-master
 

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby Roy » Sun 11 May 2008, 12:47:10

Not really. That's about $30k per year before taxes. Try supporting a family on that. It's not easy on $60k (gross) nowadays, if you have a mortgage, medical insurance, car insurance, electricity, eat food, heat that mortgaged home, buy gas, and any outstanding debt-- like student loans, car loans, credit cards etc. Inflation is kicking lots of folks' ass right now, as I'm sure you know.

VW is building a new plant in Anderson SC. There is already a BMW plant in that area (and they aren't happy about VW's plan), a GE plant, and some secondary suppliers are also located there, such as Roechling and Plastics Omnium...

So you are right about foreign companies locating to the lower cost areas of the US. No unions, lower cost of land, less regulation, etc.
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby cube » Sun 11 May 2008, 16:37:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('timmac', '.')... why is our big 3 auto makers still leaning on the profits from big suv's and trucks sells when they should focus on more mid size high mpg trucks and autos,....
It doesn't matter if you're building a small car or a huge car....you only need to run it through the assembly line once, so the profit margins on big cars are very sweet. That's why car companies LOVE to sell big cars. That's why they've been dragging their feet correction their ass on the ground fighting like mad to keep on pushing these big cars onto consumers.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby patience » Sun 11 May 2008, 20:01:48

Yeah, Back in the day when I worked for GM, the sticker price markup on the small cars was around 11 to 12%, vs 24 to 25% on big cars and trucks. I don't know what it is now, but I'd bet that the ratio hasn't changed. They love the 25% margin on options, too, which is why the best selling models on the lot are always "loaded". Sales commissions are a percentage also, so guess why the sales people try to push that big loaded stuff?

Gm's original financial problems were less the union wages and benefits, and more the inefficient, top-heavy organization. Now that seems to have reversed roles. It got to where I could make twice the money as a machinist that I could as an engineer. GM and others got rid of the older, more expensive engineering people by attrition and layoffs, then hired very young, inexperienced people. When I quit I was told by our engrg. mgr. that he would get stuck with some youngster that would be ineffective for several years, and wanted me to stay on. It was the bean-counter top management that did this, assuming that one body was the same as another, so get the cheap one.

They made their bed. Let them lie in it.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby Revi » Sun 11 May 2008, 23:24:23

They are dead. Let them rest in peace. The only American car company that might make it is Ford. They had to pay somebody last year even to take Chrysler. These car companies are just a huge liability for somebody.
GM is just another one of the dinosaurs. We aren't going to have a car industry in 5 years. Which cars can make it at $5 a gallon? Maybe the Focus. GM just buys the Vibe from Toyota and renames the Aveo from Suzuki. They both get around 30 mpg, which is not that great.
I think we'll end up having to bail them out with more funny money.
Or the car companies will have to guarantee the price of gas for 3 years to get people to buy their cars.
Wait, that already happened.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby Denny » Sun 11 May 2008, 23:33:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'G')m's original financial problems were less the union wages and benefits, and more the inefficient, top-heavy organization. Now that seems to have reversed roles. It got to where I could make twice the money as a machinist that I could as an engineer.
They made their bed. Let them lie in it.

Yep, that would be the GM I came to know and despise and left too.
Roger Smith would whine about labor costs, rightfully enough, but have no real guts to attack them in a strike setting, and then tried to do an end run by developing the "lights out" factory. Trouble was, the only lights that went out were in Roger's brain. The major engineering and tooling contractors made out like bandits.

I still remember GM writing off an engine plant in Lansing, MI, roughly 1984 after having invested over $900 million in it in 1981 or thereabouts. And, they did that kind of thing again and again.
I think those who stuck it out in GM were the organization type zombies who didn't have a spark of imagination in them. Now it shows. All in all, life has not been bad to them, but likely a whole generation of GM people under age 45 will have nothing to look forward to.
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby patience » Mon 12 May 2008, 08:44:14

Denny, When did DeLorean quit? I don't remember, but I read his book, "On a Clear Day You Can See General Motors", lambasting the takeover of the BOD/13th Floor of GM building, by accounting types, like Roger Smith.
Yeah, I was at Central Foundry Div., Bedford, IN, when the robotics thing hit, but then (1980) they were so deep in the crap trying to meet CAFE standards that they were just cramming that aluminum foundry with new parts to save weight.

During that time, they hired a person for Tool Engineering, as a Designer, who had a degree in INTERIOR DESIGN, a wallpaper expert, but she was a black woman, so that helped meet their minority quota. To her credit, she did her best, and was a real asset, but it serves to show management non-thinking.
A friend of mine quit in 1974 to work for some obscure electronics firm in Idaho-Hewlett Packard, and was derided out the door as a fool for leaving "Generous Motors" and their cradle-to-the-grave wonderful benefits. Yeah, right. What a bunch of insufferable egomaniacs. By 1980 I couldn't stand it any more and left. It was a breath of fresh air.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 12 May 2008, 19:21:11

GM can't claim they don't know about peakoil now: Autoblog
Larry Burns, GM's vice president of research and development, spoke right after Dr. Robert Hirsch, ala the Hirsch report.
Hirsch said: "[the]problems are upon us right now, or upon us in the near future"
mos6507
 

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby Denny » Tue 13 May 2008, 23:37:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'D')enny, When did DeLorean quit?

John DeLorean quit GM in 1973, checked it in Wikipedia.
By the way, another GM announcement. They are now to close the Windsor trasmission plant, the second big Canadian layoff announcement in two weeks.
I had a friend who worked there, and remember when they doubled the size of that facility, invested nearly $1 billion in the early 1980's. It was the largest GM Canada project investment ever to that point in time. It seems hard to believe they can just lock the doors on that kind of money. But, I guess the early 1980's are a ways back in time now.

It still amazes me to see the old GM plant in downtown Oshawa, now it just looks like a 25 acre parking lot. Thousands of men worked there and they built millions of vehicles between 1919 and 1960 when it was converted into component production. It still employed thousands of workers into the 1980's. It was Canada's largest plastic molding plant in the 1970's. Now all of it outsourced.
So, I am still wondering if they will be able to top up the pension plan to its proper level. It is not looking good.
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby alokin » Wed 14 May 2008, 00:20:10

I read about how the big 3 always meddled in politics, against clean air act, mileage, bought trams to rip them out etc. and I saw a film called "who killed the electric car".
That's maybe the punishment, right so.
Poor workers, they pay for it.
User avatar
alokin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri 24 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby Denny » Wed 14 May 2008, 21:49:21

I am concerned abut the GM stockholders too. The stock is down 1/3 just in the past three or four moths. Now this: GM will need $9B infusion
(Interestingly, this article was on Reuters, not in the American papers, including he Detroit News,)
She's hemorrhaging and needs a transfusion. ASt least according to the financial experts. What is peculiar, compared to history is that GM walked right through the Great Depression, made $3 billion in profits during that period, and only had three losing years. But, today, things seem much grimmer. Let's pray she stays afloat. Places like Michigan and Ontario, Ohio and Indiana need GM type jobs and investment.

"GM Chief Financial Officer Ray Young on Tuesday said GM had about $7 billion in undrawn credit facilities in addition to its roughly $24 billion in liquidity as of the end of the first quarter.
He said that while GM was confident of its "liquidity cushion" through 2008, it could take action to raise funds and to cut cut costs further if the current U.S. economic downturn deepens or becomes prolonged.
"If current adverse economic conditions persist or deteriorate further, we would consider a wide range of possible actions to reduce our funding needs and to obtain additional liquidity," Young said at a presentation for bankers outside Detroit."
User avatar
Denny
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1738
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby mos6507 » Thu 15 May 2008, 04:09:39

I wonder how much of GM's financial problems are due to the housing crisis (GMAC): GMAC
mos6507
 

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby larrydallas » Thu 15 May 2008, 15:09:47

Aside from just energy prices being high GM and the other domestics have been building inferior products since the 1970s. Pick pretty much most nay American car built before then and it was world class. Cadillacs were rolling works of art, Chevys were tanks that went 10 yrs, etc...

In the 70s GM funded research to find ways to make a car self destruct after 5 years so they could sell more cars. It worked right until the late 80s. Now you have Japanese and German names building in the USA with cars that go 200K miles easy.

GM can only count on fleet sales to rental cars firms and govt. buyers.
User avatar
larrydallas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 15 May 2008, 17:41:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('larrydallas', 'A')side from just energy prices being high GM and the other domestics have been building inferior products since the 1970s. Pick pretty much most nay American car built before then and it was world class. Cadillacs were rolling works of art, Chevys were tanks that went 10 yrs, etc...
In the 70s GM funded research to find ways to make a car self destruct after 5 years so they could sell more cars. It worked right until the late 80s. Now you have Japanese and German names building in the USA with cars that go 200K miles easy.
GM can only count on fleet sales to rental cars firms and govt. buyers.

Balogny.
vision-master
 

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby alokin » Fri 16 May 2008, 00:56:52

that's true. You don't see American cars in developed countries, they buy Japanese or European stuff. Same with white goods. And the difference is incredible (I had to buy a US fridge here in Australia, real crab).
Reading this thread I was really astonished about the wages paid in America - who can live on thees wages?? And then there are so few holidays! Many foreigners coming to Brisbane begin as cleaners or making sandwiches and they get $15.
The richest nation on earth??? That's a joke!
User avatar
alokin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1255
Joined: Fri 24 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby cube » Fri 16 May 2008, 04:50:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('larrydallas', 'P')ick pretty much most nay American car built before then and it was world class. Cadillacs were rolling works of art, Chevys were tanks that went 10 yrs, etc...
... Now you have Japanese and German names building in the USA with cars that go 200K miles easy.

Balony.

Is the build quality of small American cars any good?
truth or false is irrelevant in business.
It is public perception that matters.
GM has "earned a reputation" for having an extreme fetish for pushing BIG cars and being incapable of producing a decent small car. This reputation is so firmly etched in stone I honestly see only 2 options for GM in a post PO world:
1) bankruptcy
2) a government bailout
there is no 3rd option
IMHO the world economy is over-saturated with car companies. If we all woke up tomorrow and 10% of all car companies went bankrupt there will still be ample production capacity to meet consumer demand. And that's not even taking PO into account yet.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby usncom » Fri 16 May 2008, 18:31:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('alokin', 't')hat's true. You don't see American cars in developed countries, they buy Japanese or European stuff. Same with white goods. And the difference is incredible (I had to buy a US fridge here in Australia, real crab).
Reading this thread I was really astonished about the wages paid in America - who can live on thees wages?? And then there are so few holidays! Many foreigners coming to Brisbane begin as cleaners or making sandwiches and they get $15.
The richest nation on earth??? That's a joke!

Not true. Almost 75% of GM's sales comes from OVERSEAS. Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East accounted for 58% of its total sales and last I checked it was RISING.You may not have seen the exact same models overseas that you see here in America but they are there.
Surprisingly there are some really fuel effecient economy cars that are available overseas that aren't available here due to lack of demand. Vauxhall, Holden, and Opel are all GM and have a strong presence in Europe and Australia.

I see some here are still living in the seventies even though the market has drastically changed. The quality gap is almost insignificant however the impression of inferior product is still there. If Hyundai can make the change so can GM. I just wish it werent taking so damn long.
Furthermore, lets keep in mind that with the extremely low gas prices here in USA relative to the rest of the world there just isn't as much demand for small econo boxes. CAFE can try hard as it may but if the demand isn't there there will be no incentive to sell the smaller cars. Opel and Vauxhall (GM brands) have some pretty successful economy cars in Europe. They might be just as popular here in the USA if there were a high gas tax like Europe's.
If there is one good thing about these high prices, its that we will finally see a big spike in demand for economy cars.
User avatar
usncom
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun 04 May 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 16 May 2008, 19:58:27

Yeah, that 3800 V-6 is a pile of junk as it's only been in production since about 1962............

An my FULL-SIZE GMC car will get close to 30 mpg highway and outrun them ToyHonSukz's any day. :razz:
vision-master
 

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby MarkJ » Sat 17 May 2008, 10:07:25

I run in the mid 20s with my LS1 powered 2002 Trans Am even though I don't really baby it.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: GM lays off thousands from big suv & truck plants

Unread postby patience » Sat 17 May 2008, 10:24:37

My old S-10 gets 25 in winter and 29 mpg in summer, was cheap to buy and they usually last me around 200,000 miles, treated like aborrowed mules every inch of the way. I beat them to death, but it takes a long time.
Of course GM in their infinite stupidity screwed THAT up, too. Now it is bigger, with a bigger engine, and of course costs more. Pee on 'em. Natural selection weeds out stupidity in business.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron