by Pops » Mon 12 May 2008, 18:28:36
Reading through the Professors recent papers (linked to above I came across
This One:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he 2007 Word of the Year was “Locavore,” according to the Oxford University Press. “The past year saw the popularization of a trend in using locally grown ingredients, taking advantage of seasonally available foodstuffs that can be bought and prepared without the need for extra preservatives” (
http://blog.oup.com/2007/11/locavore/). However, the locavore movement is not just about eating seasonally; it is the latest phase in a transition from an industrial to a sustainable food economy. The local foods movement began in the United States in the 1960s among the “back to the landers.” They began the “natural foods” movement, not only as a rejection of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides but also a rejection of the industrialization of agriculture.
Not only do we have this trend to consider, but also The Green Bubble stemming from global warming threats and the too real situation of increasing transportation cost but the dawning realization among the general population of the Rich World that others are starving.
Against the background of the typhoon in Burma and the tornadoes that killed a few folks the next county over Susan said an interesting thing this morning listening to a story about the earthquake in China:
"Mother Nature seems to be getting pissed at us."
My question here is simply this:
Is there a dawning realization that we (the human race) might need to change what we are doing and GW is just the popular face at this point?
Will such change the buying habits at the grocery store, which of course is the demand side of the supply and demand equation in Ag?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)