by Heineken » Sun 11 May 2008, 15:15:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')here are many fields in which you only have to work 20-30 years to draw a nice pension for life.
Military, police and fire come to mind.
Think about that: assume a life expectancy of 80 years. Out of that 80 years, only 20-30 would be spent working. The other 50-60 years would be spent living at someone else's expense. That's really something.
A lot of those jobs are often miserable and entail considerable personal risk, Tex.
I support the concept of public pensions for people doing society's dirty work.
When you think about it, the police are the only thing standing between us and barbarism.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog
"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
-

Heineken
- Expert

-
- Posts: 7051
- Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Rural Virginia
-
by BigTex » Sun 11 May 2008, 15:23:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')here are many fields in which you only have to work 20-30 years to draw a nice pension for life.
Military, police and fire come to mind.
Think about that: assume a life expectancy of 80 years. Out of that 80 years, only 20-30 would be spent working. The other 50-60 years would be spent living at someone else's expense. That's really something.
A lot of those jobs are often miserable and entail considerable personal risk, Tex.
I support the concept of public pensions for people doing society's dirty work.
When you think about it, the police are the only thing standing between us and barbarism.
I don't disagree with you.
It's just interesting that a person would be able to live 50-60 years without having to work and the rest of society would be okay with that.
Those professions have a good thing going. A VERY good thing, assuming you live to draw the pension.
by Homesteader » Sun 11 May 2008, 15:29:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')here are many fields in which you only have to work 20-30 years to draw a nice pension for life.
Military, police and fire come to mind.
Think about that: assume a life expectancy of 80 years. Out of that 80 years, only 20-30 would be spent working. The other 50-60 years would be spent living at someone else's expense. That's really something.
A lot of those jobs are often miserable and entail considerable personal risk, Tex.
I support the concept of public pensions for people doing society's dirty work.
When you think about it, the police are the only thing standing between us and barbarism.
I don't disagree with you.
It's just interesting that a person would be able to live 50-60 years without having to work and the rest of society would be okay with that.
Those professions have a good thing going. A VERY good thing, assuming you live to draw the pension.
Well heck Tex, the average worker/professional only works 10 years longer at most. Round numbers-> out of college at 25, work 30 years as a cop -> retire at 55. Regular professional works somewhere between 5-10 years longer and in many cases makes far more money, perhaps a pension, perhaps a 401K, perhaps stock options.
Over an 80 year life span that isn't a huge difference in time spent working. Plus, I know many of the cop, teacher civil servant types who "retire" and continue to work at least part time.
by vision-master » Sun 11 May 2008, 16:11:00
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he world that I've known in the private sector has no protections for job loss, no pensions, no elaborate benefit plans. As a result, I can't identify with people who think that they should keep getting paid after they quit working. It reminds me of Mr. Bill's signature:
"The State is a wonderful invention where everyone can live at someone else's expense."
The pension system was devised when life expectancy was between 65 and 68 years of age. People are now living, in poor health, until they are in their eighties, and it's not just a drain on the pension system. It's an all around psychological , physical and spiritual drain, for the entire society.
Too bad for you. Daddy steered me into Public Service for a reason. For J6P that's the way to go, if'n you can stand the torture. If not for my years of Public Service I would be buggered right now. And just think, we get raises every year too!

by eastbay » Sun 11 May 2008, 19:20:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')here are many fields in which you only have to work 20-30 years to draw a nice pension for life.
Military, police and fire come to mind.
Think about that: assume a life expectancy of 80 years. Out of that 80 years, only 20-30 would be spent working. The other 50-60 years would be spent living at someone else's expense. That's really something.
A lot of those jobs are often miserable and entail considerable personal risk, Tex.
I support the concept of public pensions for people doing society's dirty work.
When you think about it, the police are the only thing standing between us and barbarism.
I don't disagree with you.
It's just interesting that a person would be able to live 50-60 years without having to work and the rest of society would be okay with that.
Those professions have a good thing going. A VERY good thing, assuming you live to draw the pension.
The reward for doing societies 'dirty work' should be in the form of salary and injury coverage. That's it.
The idea that society should pay someone 60 to 100% of their salary
for life is really nutty. I can understand a small pension on the order of 10 to 20% of the average of their last few years pay dished out after they turn 60 or so, but what's going on now for so many is really wasteful and extravagant. It simply can't continue. It's another example of how the party is coming to a close.
I have a 50 year old friend who's a retired cop. He collects $50,000 a year for life, with inflationary increases plus full medical coverage. He is flat broke all the time because for him saving money is meaningless. He blows his monthly check by the second or third week then waits for the mail. This will continue for decades and there are millions just like him. I can't help thinking his [s]checks[/s] days are numbered, so to speak.
by roccman » Sun 11 May 2008, 20:19:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he world that I've known in the private sector has no protections for job loss, no pensions, no elaborate benefit plans. As a result, I can't identify with people who think that they should keep getting paid after they quit working. It reminds me of Mr. Bill's signature:
"The State is a wonderful invention where everyone can live at someone else's expense."
The pension system was devised when life expectancy was between 65 and 68 years of age. People are now living, in poor health, until they are in their eighties, and it's not just a drain on the pension system. It's an all around psychological , physical and spiritual drain, for the entire society.
Logan's Run baby!!!
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins