What is the demand destruction then, in clear terms?
Say we have a poor nation state economy
A, who requires minimum amount of
X oil to run their basic infrastructure on a sort of limping, skeleton, only basics covered -sort of scheme.
Economy
A enters the marketplace to buy the oil but finds out that however much they cut from nigh everything, they can't meet the price of
Y to obtain the
X amount. So what do they do? Do they simply "not buy any oil" to send a message through the marketplace that they are unhappy with the high prices? I would assume they don't, but more rather gather up what they have and get as much oil as they can, to avoid the disruptive chaos, disarray and political upheaval that would result. They are priced out of their minimum needs, but still get what they possibly can?
Supply of oil is a constant but the quantity is in decline. The disparity between between
X, the minimum amount the
A economy needs, and
X-Z, where
Z is the amount they actually get after they throw all the money they can on the table, is "destroyed demand"? Its not like these guys in nation state
A don't demand or need the oil...
Given time more players just like nation state
A enter the marketplace and are desperate for oil, but the supply is a constant in decline. What is the price going to do other than shoot into the stars, as these entities compete for the resource they so crave?
We are in 2008 oil is 120$ per barrel. People I (try to) talk to about oil still see the whole idea of peak oil as a kooky tin-foil hat theory. Technology will save us, figure out a way. They reply with that or something similar. But if taken as an entity who produces stuff needing energy input I can't see technology as anything else other than just another
child of god like nation state
A here, who would like to obtain (more) oil to do some cool stuff with it.
In part, I'm just venting here and plead for forgiveness. Thank you.