Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Very Disturbing

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 11:34:20

Sorry if this is not in the correct discussion area. I have been visiting this forum for a few years, mostly as an information gathering source, not so much on the participation level. I have gained some knowledge of what is happening to our world due to the effects of PO and other activities that we have ALL inflicted on the planet/society thanks to many contributors to the forum. I just watched the video below and truly feel very sick to my stomach. Sure, some of you have probably watch this and have opinions, I just wanted to share this and hopefully get some feedback from how others interpret the information presented. I believe there are many things developing to create the perfect storm we all read and some speak of.

After watching this video, I finally realize what "us" Americans have done to really screw things up. I now understand what part we continue to be in propagating the continuation of this process. Personally I am going to do what ever it takes to try to make a difference while the same time preparing myself and family for the times ahead. Again, I am very interested in what a bunch of intelligent thoughtful people think of this content. Thanks in advance for the sharing of information.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 3867390173
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby Cashmere » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 12:15:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')fter watching this video, I finally realize what "us" Americans have done to really screw things up.


Be careful voicing that truism.

Today it gets you the label "unpatriotic".

Some day soon it will get you the label "traitor".
User avatar
Cashmere
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1882
Joined: Thu 27 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 12:40:55

Cashmere, Great name by the way,

Not concerned about labels, as it appears that process has begun on many levels. And my statement is far from being unpatriotic, I love and care for my country and what it was suppose to represent. If being a traitor is standing up to the manipulations of the last century by a few greedy power hungry entities, then it appears now is the time for people to mobilize into action. There are more and more people out there willing to stand up, not crackpots mind you. The people are truly the answer, not running away or complaining or hypothesizing over what is happening, but we need to begin doing something to help stop the direction we currently head . A handful of greedy evil people began this march, the masses can stop it. Just look at history. By sharing facts and truth to all, even "sheeple" can affect true change.
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 13:14:34

[smilie=5dunce.gif]

I swear to god, some moron could make a video about how there's no law against raping children, post it on youtube, and you people would believe it.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 13:29:14

By the way, if you're having a hard time finding the law that requires you to pay income taxes, Try 26USC1 link

Granted it's an evil law, but it clearly is the law.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 13:36:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'B')y the way, if you're having a hard time finding the law that requires you to pay income taxes, Try 26USC1 link

Granted it's an evil law, but it clearly is the law.


True, but it's also unconstitutional. It's in direct violation of the 10th amendment. Of course, good luck having that position upheld in court...Wars have begun that way.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 13:38:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'T')rue, but it's also unconstitutional. It's in direct violation of the 10th amendment. Of course, good luck having that position upheld in court...Wars have begun that way.


The 16th amendment violates the 10th amendment? Yeah...good luck with that in court.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:24:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'T')rue, but it's also unconstitutional. It's in direct violation of the 10th amendment. Of course, good luck having that position upheld in court...Wars have begun that way.


The 16th amendment violates the 10th amendment? Yeah...good luck with that in court.


That's what I'm saying. It doesn't matter that the 16th amendment was improperly ratified. It doesn't matter that the version of the 16th amendment currently in the constitution is not the version that was ratified. It doesn't matter that the tax is progressive and therefore unconstitutional. It doesn't matter that 14th amendment was improperly ratified.

None of that matters, because the federal government says it doesn't matter, and any state who doesn't tow the line is punished.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:26:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'B')y the way, if you're having a hard time finding the law that requires you to pay income taxes, Try 26USC1 link

Granted it's an evil law, but it clearly is the law.


Look again, that is a "code" not a law (ie USC, C meaning code not law). I challenge you to find the LAW that makes that code constitutional and enforcable. It also says "taxable income" do you know what that means? If not, I would suggest you look into the actual meaning of taxable income. It has NOTHING to do with your salary or wages derived by labor.

As a moderator it is disappointing that you can refer to legitimate information sharing as "morons" believing in sitcoms. Maybe you should take the 1 1/2 hour break from your day to sit and thoughtfully look at the info that is readily available for review in that video.
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:34:45

In addition to my responsibilities here, I am a tax attorney, and ALL arguments about the legality/constitutionality/morality of the income tax are a complete waste of your time and energy.

Much better to hire someone who understands how the system ACTUALLY works, rather than someone who understands how it SHOULD work.

I'm not commenting on whether any of the tax protest movements' arguments are interesting or not, I'm just saying that you shouldn't test an anti-gravity device by jumping off the top of a building.

Focus on what works.

***

FYI, "USC", or United States Code, is where the federal laws appear after being passed by Congress and signed by the President. The USC publishing methodology allows, among other things, acts of Congress that impact different existing laws to basically amend existing section of the United States Code, rather than adding on to the list of federal laws endlessly.

You may also notice that any public law will have different section references than the USC reference. This is because section 1 of the 2008 FREEDOM ACT may actually be an amendment to 29 USC 312 (I just made that up).

When you see "CFR", that is a reference to the Code of Federal Regulations. These are the rules that the applicable federal agencies charged with enforcing federal laws write in the process of figuring out how to interpret an act of Congress that is within their enforcement jurisdiction.

For the IRS, there is the Internal Revenue Code, which is a portion of the United States Code, and then there are the Income Tax Regulations prepared by the Treasury Department. In addition to the law and the regulations, there is a whole galaxy of guidance, interpretations, rulings, opinions, and other views that come from the IRS regarding the proper answer to a given tax question.

On the judicial side, tax cases can be heard in either federal court of in the Tax Court, depending upon how the dispute arises. Either court is going to give a lot of deference to the Internal Revenue Code, the Income Tax Regulations and will give varying degrees of deference to other pieces of IRS guidance.

I hope that helps clarify how some of the tax system rules work.

One of the rules that most practicing attorneys will tell you is that if your best argument is that something is unconstitutional, you've probably got a pretty weak case (especially outside the criminal law arena). Not always, but usually.
Last edited by BigTex on Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:52:42, edited 1 time in total.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:43:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')n addition to my responsibilities here, I am a tax attorney, and ALL arguments about the legality/constitutionality/morality of the income tax are a complete waste of your time and energy.

Much better to hire someone who understands how the system ACTUALLY works, rather than someone who understands how it SHOULD work.

I'm not commenting on whether any of the tax protest movements' arguments are interesting or not, I'm just saying that you shouldn't test an anti-gravity device by jumping off the top of a building.

Focus on what works.


Big Tex,

From my perspective the building we all stand on is only 3 feet tall. We are being misled into believing it is 100 stories tall. It is way more simple than it appears, and truly studying this situation will reveal the truth. It would also be interesting to hear from the above posters and others after they view the video...
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 14:47:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('madpaddler', 'L')ook again, that is a "code" not a law (ie USC, C meaning code not law).


SWEET! So that means I don't have to comply with 18USC229 either? I can stockpile chemical weapons to my heart's content?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t also says "taxable income" do you know what that means?

Indeed.

26USC2(e) "For definition of taxable income, see section 63"link

26USC63(a) "the term 'taxable income' means gross income minus the deductions
allowed by this chapter (other than the standard deduction)." link

26USC61(a) "Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;
(8 ) Alimony and separate maintenance payments;
(9) Annuities;
(10) Income from life insurance and endowment contracts;
(11) Pensions;
(12) Income from discharge of indebtedness;
(13) Distributive share of partnership gross income;
(14) Income in respect of a decedent; and
(15) Income from an interest in an estate or trust." link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s a moderator it is disappointing that you can refer to legitimate information sharing as "morons" believing in sitcoms.
Yeah.....Anybody holding a march on Washington because they are unable to read the laws, is a moron. Hold a march because you don't like the law. Because you want the law changed. I'll even join you, but don't try to prevaricate and make up a bunch of crap to deny that it exists.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe you should take the 1 1/2 hour break from your day to sit and thoughtfully look at the info that is readily available for review in that video.
Ohh...I am. I'm about 38 minutes in so far and every legal claim that I've come across has been a verifiable lie, but I'll keep watching.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 15:01:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('madpaddler', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')n addition to my responsibilities here, I am a tax attorney, and ALL arguments about the legality/constitutionality/morality of the income tax are a complete waste of your time and energy.

Much better to hire someone who understands how the system ACTUALLY works, rather than someone who understands how it SHOULD work.

I'm not commenting on whether any of the tax protest movements' arguments are interesting or not, I'm just saying that you shouldn't test an anti-gravity device by jumping off the top of a building.

Focus on what works.


Big Tex,

From my perspective the building we all stand on is only 3 feet tall. We are being misled into believing it is 100 stories tall. It is way more simple than it appears, and truly studying this situation will reveal the truth. It would also be interesting to hear from the above posters and others after they view the video...


My friend, I wish what you were saying were the case.

But it's not.

Trust me. I don't need to study the situation to reveal the truth. I know what the truth is, and it's whatever the federal courts say it is.

Please don't waste your time and indignation on this topic.

It will only frustrate you. I PROMISE YOU that no tax reform will ever occur as a result of the line of reasoning you are using.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 15:26:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s a moderator it is disappointing that you can refer to legitimate information sharing as "morons" believing in sitcoms.
Yeah.....Anybody holding a march on Washington because they are unable to read the laws, is a moron. Hold a march because you don't like the law. Because you want the law changed. I'll even join you, but don't try to prevaricate and make up a bunch of crap to deny that it exists.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe you should take the 1 1/2 hour break from your day to sit and thoughtfully look at the info that is readily available for review in that video.
Ohh...I am. I'm about 38 minutes in so far and every legal claim that I've come across has been a verifiable lie, but I'll keep watching.[/quote]

Thanks, that is all I am asking. Do you remember the first time you recognized PO as a real problem? Did you immediately dismiss the idea as concocted by a bunch of paranoid gullible people? My brother told me about PO in 2005 and at first I thought, oh jezz here he goes again. Then I joined this forum to study for myself and try to rationalize what he was saying.

If you feel my post is just one of those crazy anti-tax loons trying to get away with paying money, you are wrong. I would gladly pay my "share" to help fund any number of reasonable programs. You all see what is happening concerning the value of our currency, what is happening with our government, the world issues...they are all connected and for it to be dismissed as flatly as you have is disappointing. If you can indicate the info is "a bunch of crap" please do so... it does nothing but help the education process.

Cheers!
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 15:39:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('madpaddler', 'D')o you remember the first time you recognized PO as a real problem? Did you immediately dismiss the idea as concocted by a bunch of paranoid gullible people?


No, not really. It's pretty logical, and there's no viable refutation. The only thing I've ever heard any in depth argument about vis-a-via PO is when it's coming and what it's impact will be.

I brushed off Y2k that way though.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you feel my post is just one of those crazy anti-tax loons trying to get away with paying money, you are wrong. I would gladly pay my "share" to help fund any number of reasonable programs.

Like I said, I think income taxes are a horrible thing, and the ever blossoming federal government they have enable is a monster. I just think it's really naive to think your going to get rid of that monster with some argument about "You didn't use the right word here." If the federal government is good at anything, it is good at passing laws, regulating our behavior, and coming up with inescapable mechanisms to extract taxes from us.

You want to have a march on Washington to repeal the 16th amendment and the Internal Revenue Code, I'm there with you. Let's do it. But for now the code does exist. It does require filling of returns and paying of taxes. Pretending it's not there is not going to solve the problem.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 15:44:04

Please don't waste your time and indignation on this topic.

It will only frustrate you. I PROMISE YOU that no tax reform will ever occur as a result of the line of reasoning you are using.[/quote]

Hey, thanks for the info. By the way, I am not angry, just frustrated. Frustration is not always a bad thing.
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 15:48:26

I've found the best way to avoid paying taxes is to lower one's income. If one can gradually transition to a sharing economy with neighbors and friends, and become more self-sufficient (which I think we need to do anyway to deal with peak oil), the need for an income becomes much less.
Ludi
 

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby SpringCreekFarm » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 16:00:28

So are some of you saying that this documentary is complete bullshit?

It sounded like Ron Paul was confirming what Russo was saying. Are you suggesting that Ron Paul is lying?

Please explain.
SpringCreekFarm
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 936
Joined: Fri 03 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby madpaddler » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 16:13:34

[/quote]
Like I said, I think income taxes are a horrible thing, and the ever blossoming federal government they have enable is a monster. I just think it's really naive to think your going to get rid of that monster with some argument about "You didn't use the right word here." If the federal government is good at anything, it is good at passing laws, regulating our behavior, and coming up with inescapable mechanisms to extract taxes from us.

You want to have a march on Washington to repeal the 16th amendment and the Internal Revenue Code, I'm there with you. Let's do it. But for now the code does exist. It does require filling of returns and paying of taxes. Pretending it's not there is not going to solve the problem.[/quote]

I understand what you are saying, but are we all so conditioned to continue status quo even though it creates an even slippery slope for our future? If the answer is yes, then so be it, bring on PO and all that comes with it. I just see this as being only one of the issues we face in the downward spiral we are witnessing today. This one in my mind is one of the main causes for the devaluation of our currency amongst other other factors such as PO. The action of marching on Washington just puts a face on the problem, but that is all that activity will do, (hey but I'll let youknow when I'm on the way!). I am thinking that through the individual actions of many that things still could be changed. What is one thing we could do right now to affect our oil dependency? Cut back on our consumption, right? The effect would be greater as more participated. Should we all continue to pretend this is not happening?
madpaddler
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue 30 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South of the Mason Dixon Line

Re: Very Disturbing

Unread postby BigTex » Mon 28 Apr 2008, 16:18:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'S')o are some of you saying that this documentary is complete bullshit?

It sounded like Ron Paul was confirming what Russo was saying. Are you suggesting that Ron Paul is lying?

Please explain.


An argument can be technically sound, but legally unpersuasive.

That's what we have here.

Ron Paul was not lying.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Next

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests