by BigTex » Mon 21 Apr 2008, 16:56:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Devin', 'T')hat we are overpopulated is no one's fault, and that we have no relationship with the land is an outgrowth of that overpopulation. It has little to do with individuals and everything to do with evolution and enculturation. It's all very simple and utterly blameless, though extremely frustrating at times. Finding a way out is like trying to get out of a riptide -- if you try to fight it head on you'll exhaust yourself and die. All you can do is swim sideways and hope you can get out fast enough so you can make it back to shore. Even then there are no guarantees you won't be eaten by a shark or get caught in another riptide.
I just had a totally random thought that something you said triggered:
One of our problems is that we have outsmarted all of our predators, for now, and we consider life today to be more or less humanity's highest expression of itself thus far in our evolution and development.
The problem is that by removing ourselves from the vagaries of our ecosystem, we have planted the seeds of our own demise--i.e., overshoot and die-off.
None of the above is new.
The random thought I had is that we are just like the rabbits in "Watership Down." At the end of the story they had reached a place where no one would try to harm them and they could live peacefully. However, and I had never thought about it this way, we all know what would happen to a rabbit colony with no predators--overshoot and die-off. So what they saw as the highest expression of their society was actually the worst possible thing that could happen to them from a long term survival perspective.
It would have been better for the Hazels and Bigwigs to live and let the Fivers be Scooby Snacks.
I can't believe I never saw it that way, when it is SO obvious. The rabbits in my own neighborhood are going through a die-off/kill-off right now.