Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby mkwin » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 14:02:47

I have a hypothesis, which I thought I would put out there.

It seemed this last year that the near-term peakers (Simmons, Campbell. Skebowski etc) had been vindicated. The oil price has reached record heights, production had been flat, and some of the mega fields were accelerating their decline.

I have been studying the price of many industrial commodities since 2002-2003. It seems the price of many have taken off due to the explosive demand of Asia and other rapidly industrializing countries.

It occurred to me this apparent peak could simple be a transition to this accelerating demand.

Oil projects take years to commission, to design the projects, bring in the staff, source the finance, and actually build the engineering project.

What if the oil industry around the world was unprepared for this rapid surge in demand and that is the reason we have had a run up in oil prices (as with every other industrial commodity) along with the decline in the dollar.

The industry now seems to be scheduled to deliver a lot more extra capacity to the world oil market over the next few years.

Image

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_megaprojects

So let us start a discussion. Did the events of 2007 vindicate the near-peakers or was it an illusion and the next few years will see a correction in the oil price with peak being put off to at least 2013 or, if capacity continues to be added, indefinitely?
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby like_the_dinosaurs » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 15:44:05

The last time I checked most of these new projects are running months, even years behind aswell as over budget. Yes the industry is moving heaven and earth to put more crude into the market and look what we have.

The writing is on the wall. Cheap energy is over.
"The elite DO believe they are worshipping and are being directed by demon creatures." ALEX JONES
User avatar
like_the_dinosaurs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 23 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby FreddyH » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 15:49:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', ' ')Did the events of 2007 vindicate the near-peakers or was it an illusion and the next few years will see a correction in the oil price with peak being put off to at least 2013 or, if capacity continues to be added, indefinitely?


The events over the last 24 months are easily explainable: A globe firing on all 8 cylinders is not routine. Usually at least one region (japan, europe, noramer, southamer) is in recession at all times. This awesome post Iraq2 economic activity raised expectations and the petroleum industry responded with record production in July 2006.

Unfortunately, it expanded to the extent that a 1.5-mbd surplus was created. It took many quarters and a 28% price correction to clear the record stock build. With those global inventories back to 5-yr norms, the growth in supply has been reinstated and EIA has reported new production records five times in the last six months.

The prob with bottom up forecasting is that it is based somewhat on announced Megaprojects. In 2004, Campbell was forecasting an All Liquids Peak for 2006. In 2004, Skrebowski saw an inevitable Peak in 2008. These forecasts were dashed (as each one since 1989) by ever expanding Megaprojects.

In short, an undisclosed caveat in each forecast is "if no further capacity expansions are commissioned..."

My own Scenario-2300 model struggles with this reality. I've tentatively resolved this phenom by protraying two Peaks (as seen in chart below). The pessimistic projection is based on announced megaprojects. The optimistic trend assumes the bold notion that the rate of megaprojects will continue into the future.

The great unknown factor really is the Underlying Decline Rate trend. Your comment "if capacity continues to be added, indefinitely?" is tempered by the reality that UDR seems to be increasing (0.23-mbd/yr). Infinite supply growth, within URR limitations, assumes that UDR will never catch up to annual Megaproject growth.

My analysis currently foresees a UDR surpassing new capacity build in 2019 upon the real Peak in Convention Oil. Based on Megaproject flows, the 67-mbd high in 2005 seems to be a false peak:
Image
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby mkwin » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 15:53:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('like_the_dinosaurs', 'T')he last time I checked most of these new projects are running months, even years behind aswell as over budget. Yes the industry is moving heaven and earth to put more crude into the market and look what we have.

The writing is on the wall. Cheap energy is over.


There are delays in some projects, yes but are we approaching hubberts peak? That was my question.

Is the reason there is no more cheap oil because world demand is soaring and the oil industry is playing catch-up?
Last edited by mkwin on Sun 13 Apr 2008, 08:27:30, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby mos6507 » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 16:45:26

These stats don't tell the whole story. Compare the price of oil when production entered into a plateau to today. For the production numbers to shoot up a little is of little consequence if the price of oil continues to go up, which it will if demand continues to outstrip supply.
mos6507
 

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby FreddyH » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 16:54:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'T')here are delays in some projects, yes but are we approaching hubberts peak? That was my question.


Hubbert's analysis incorporated a cumulation of fields within a petroleum province, nation and globally.

Unfortunately, it appears to me that All Liquids cannot be analysed and Peak Rate projected in a similar manner. All Liquids is comprised of a dozen components that each have their own uniquely fashioned bell curve. Neither can one merely base Peak Rate on the midpoint as is the ideal style with conventional oil. Peak would be 75 years from now. Peak will be determined by flow rates ... not All Liquids' 5.8-Tb (or 3.8-Tb) URR.

OTOH, with my assumption of a URR of 2305-Gb for Regular Conventional Oil, it should cross over its midpoint of 1153 in 2012. This would also almost be exactly half way thru its forecast 1997-2025 plateau...
www.TrendLines.ca/scenarios.htm Home of the Real Peak Date ... set by geologists (not pundits)
User avatar
FreddyH
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 321
Joined: Mon 14 Jan 2008, 04:00:00
Location: The Yukon

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 19:39:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GASMON', 'W')hy is this oil not flowing


Trouble with those pesky darn Iraqis.
Ludi
 

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby Gerben » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 19:47:54

I do not know. The world is too complex to fit into a simple Hubbert linearization. We might be past. We might be close. We might have several more decades.

I don't think the exact time of the peak is that important. We've already reached a point where oil is only getting more expensive. Where many people can no longer afford to live the way they used to. We're even in an economic crisis partly because states and people overextended their credit in an attempt to maintain business as usual: counting on endless exponential growth. We will never see $ 80 dollar oil again. We'll have to adapt to oil getting more expensive. This will not be easy. The poor are already starting to die.
User avatar
Gerben
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Holland, Belgica Foederata (Republic of the Seven United Netherlands)

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby Mudpuppy » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 20:43:42

"I don't think the exact time of the peak is that important. We've already reached a point where oil is only getting more expensive. Where many people can no longer afford to live the way they used to. We're even in an economic crisis partly because states and people overextended their credit in an attempt to maintain business as usual: counting on endless exponential growth. We will never see $ 80 dollar oil again. We'll have to adapt to oil getting more expensive. This will not be easy. The poor are already starting to die."

Great Post! I do feel people get too hung up on the date issue. Even if the peak is 30 years away, but the increase in production every year is less than the demand growth, than having a late peak is irrelevant. It may have peaked, it may yet peak soon, it may peak way down the road. But that is inconsequential to the real issue of "expensive oil is here and now", and our civilisation is still geared to run on cheap oil and cheap gas. I see in this mornings news that Haiti`s Prime Minister is being ousted due to expensive food prices, and there is more unrest in Egypt over the bread price, and while reading those news articles I carelessly burned and ruined a pot of Basmati rice I had on the stove. Expensive oil is a bottom up issue as it affects the poorest first and then trickles through its effects to the wealthier economies. (There was another train of thought I was thinking of here, but my burned basmati means there may be a food riot in my kitchen if breakfast isn`t done on time, so will leave that for now).
User avatar
Mudpuppy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun 31 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Japan

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby BigTex » Sat 12 Apr 2008, 21:14:26

To me, large scale deepwater exploration, oil sands and oil shale are prima facie evidence that we are at or near the peak.

To me, those activities are sort of like using your dinner roll to sop up that last little bit of gravy after you've eaten most of the food on your plate.

I'm sure there will be price fluctuations up and down going forward, but it's hard to imagine that the future holds a price collapse and oil glut like we saw in the 1980s following the 1970s price shocks.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby mkwin » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 07:28:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'T')o me, large scale deepwater exploration, oil sands and oil shale are prima facie evidence that we are at or near the peak.

To me, those activities are sort of like using your dinner roll to sop up that last little bit of gravy after you've eaten most of the food on your plate.



Even CERA recognise these non-conventional fuels will be important but does this really mean conventional oil will peak and rapidly decline? It is not like no new conventional oil is coming online. There are many relatively new oil provinces.

Image

I think the use of tar sands etc is just a case of oil companies exploting profitable opportunities in stable and safe countries. Sure developing oil assets in Russian is easier but you may get your asset stolen by the government.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m sure there will be price fluctuations up and down going forward, but it's hard to imagine that the future holds a price collapse and oil glut like we saw in the 1980s following the 1970s price shocks.


Even is spare capacity hits 4-5 million barrels, the level is was in 2002?

This belief the price can only go up seems similar to the belief house prices only go up. We as people give far more weight to experiences in the recent past rather the wider and historical patterns.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 09:53:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'D')id the events of 2007 vindicate the near-peakers or was it an illusion and the next few years will see a correction in the oil price with peak being put off to at least 2013 or, if capacity continues to be added, indefinitely?

It is not 2013 yet so it is too early to say. :)

A peak is something you can only see in a rear view mirror, and it is several years before you can be sure it is what it appears to be. Therefore it is premature to discuss who is vindicated and who is proved wrong. The debate is a live one for as long as we remain on a bumpy production plateau. We will be able to come to our conclusions once we fall off it decisively.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby evilgenius » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 12:34:18

When making your calculations based on price in dollars don't forget to include the possibility that the dollar will recover. If the world economy enters a deflationary spiral the dollar will probably recover against most currencies. If that happens calculations based on price and not barrels per day will become skewed. If that happens the currencies that match up the worst will see an increasing inability to compete so their share of demand will decrease. Correspondingly the best matched currencies, probably the financially connected newly elite, should see an improvement in their ability to compete. I expect China to come out very well and the US fortunes to rise. Europe will get screwed. The new power base would be able to dictate to OPEC in the same manner that the US was able to dictate after the oil crisis of the 70's. They will have that chip as well as the added chip of having suckered the OPEC countries, with their huge dollar wealth, into buying so many crap securities from the Fed that a very real part of their future return is reliant on them cooperating in the new scheme, even if it works against them.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby mkwin » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 13:16:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'D')id the events of 2007 vindicate the near-peakers or was it an illusion and the next few years will see a correction in the oil price with peak being put off to at least 2013 or, if capacity continues to be added, indefinitely?

It is not 2013 yet so it is too early to say. :)

A peak is something you can only see in a rear view mirror, and it is several years before you can be sure it is what it appears to be. Therefore it is premature to discuss who is vindicated and who is proved wrong. The debate is a live one for as long as we remain on a bumpy production plateau. We will be able to come to our conclusions once we fall off it decisively.


Well the plateau since 2004-2005 appears to be over. The additional capacity apprears to be coming online. While I agree with Simmons, waiting until the peak is clear in the rear view mirror is not really good enough. We have to predict it and take action. The Megaprojects database is such a great tool in my opinion. The next 2-3 years production flows will be largely set due to the time it takes to commission a project. The mega projects database is inaccurate after this stage because IOC's and NOC's don't always publish their plans and projects until it has been comissioned. The projects for 2013 are yet to be set in stone, most are proberbly on the drawing board in the offices of the oil companies as we speak. Will 2013 and onwards continue show capacity increases? Watch this space. :)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he EIA’s newest International Petroleum Monthly shows World C+C production for January was 74,466,000 barrels per day, eclipsing the heretofore peak of May 2005 by 168,000 barrels per day. (thanks to Ron Patterson for the heads up and to Khebab for the quick graphics).


Image

source: http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3835#comments
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby Gerben » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 14:02:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', 'W')ell the plateau since 2004-2005 appears to be over.

It's a bit too early to draw any conclusions. One cold winter doesn't solve global warming either. I'll believe that when we reach 87 mln bpd.
User avatar
Gerben
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 629
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Holland, Belgica Foederata (Republic of the Seven United Netherlands)
Top

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 15:26:23

What if....as the new projects reach completion, Chindia starts to decline economically, isn't able to usher millions more into it's small middle class, and demand drops? The price of oil in euros might drop appreciably, even if oil has peaked.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby funzone36 » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 15:57:09

Anyone like me knows that we're already at peak. This peak (plateau) will extend until 2010 and then enter terminal decline. Goodbye growth.
User avatar
funzone36
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sun 04 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Near-Term Peak an Illusion?

Unread postby hornofhubris » Sun 13 Apr 2008, 16:07:24

The graph clearly shows the dramatic rise in other liquids. Does
this include ethanol? With 25% of US corn crop fermented and
distilled into ethanol to burn in motor vehicles I am unconvinced.
If this is the case let's have the discussion on petroleum using
only petroleum fuels and not add in biofuels or coal to liquids
to hide the fundamental baseline of petroleum only production.

We have had a President and VP go abroad and essentially
beg for more oil production this year, are they less informed
than we are, or privy to poorer data?

We are still very much in a period where temporary manipulations
of unsustainable factors can move the graph line around such
as to prevent a clear enough set of data to interpret.
User avatar
hornofhubris
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri 28 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron