by EnergyUnlimited » Tue 01 Apr 2008, 11:16:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kaj', '[')i]1. Revolutionary potential can do little to change our fate.
If by 'fate' you mean having the authoritarian boot stamped over us all (my worst fear) then I disagree. At least in the present day. If people wanted revolution they could make it happen. It would take just 10% of a capital city to overturn a government.
You do not understand that peoples will
demand this authoritarian boot to step over their faces.
Once troubles arrived, they will just demand government to
do something about it, regardless what that might be.
Democracy is a full belly product.
Once belly gets empty, it will be gone.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')i]Revolutions were working well in environment of expanding economy.
Sorry, don't understand that comment? Do you mean that revolutions will stop when the economy shrinks?
I mean, revolutions will achieve nothing except of worsening overall situation in shrinking economy environment.
That is, because it will not be possible to create/maintain meaningful wealth in shrinking economy environment.
There will be next to nothing to redistribute.
What would you like to redistribute in shrinking economy world?
Useless and abandoned suburban infrastructure?
Power elites might change [by revolution] but nothing will improve.
In fact catabolic collapse will accelerate.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')i]2. Resources crunch, food production crunch and environmental mess will stale and soon after that reverse technological progress.
I wish I could believe that. However, scientific knowlege isn't going to regress. We have everything written down. People are going to continue to write down new scientific theory, by candlelight if they have to.
Also there is always going to be energy in the system somewhere. Chances are it will remain be monopolised by the rich. Chances are they will find inventive uses for that energy.
Once manufacturing base collapses, science will become to be an esoteric exercise of few
still wealthy gentlemen.
Knowledge is useless, if you cannot apply it due to basic resource constraints.
Heck, as time pass most of it will be forgotten due to a lack of opportunity of practical application.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')i]You don't need very high tech to suppress societies either.
Militias armed with AK-47 will do and these are cheaper to run.
True, but militias aren't always reliable. Maliki's recent militia performance is a good example. Sometimes you just need a remote controlled insectoid robot stormtrooper.
Your insect robo-warriors will be sensitive to DDT, organophosphates etc.
would start to attack anyone at random (including your troops).
I doubt they would help Maliki in any way.
But hey, your high tech insects cyborgs will cost you next $ trillions to weaponize and make you bankrupt even before new war begun.