Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 12:46:46

Thanks Roccman,
I couldn't have explained that, but it describes my experience on TF. Thanks to all for the breadth and depth of insights here. I value it all very highly.

The sequence of things to come has bothered me for a year, not knowing enough to make analysis. I understand perfectly well what a world with depleted energy can be at ground level, which is bad for an old guy. "No place for old Men", etc. The finance world has been much more difficult for me. But given the input here, and common sense about declining energy, I can conclude a few things.

As energy gets more scarce, we poor folks will be priced out of it, and the labor leverage it offers, so low energy means are the place for me to concentrate my efforts. More savings (I don't have much) can profitably go into non-electric shop equipment, and passive solar heating for home and shop. Cisterns for garden watering will help us, and a wood stove I'm developing that converts easily from heating to cooking, as seasons change. There are a lot more such things we can do.

Retaining some form of cash is required, but not a lot, so I'll probably buy some silver soon, to reduce the effects discussed here. For that I'm favoring junk coins.

We will expand our self reliance for medical needs, which takes some money, and is another area we could be priced out of.

Not having much, I tend to look at the problems that I can solve piecemeal, to get the most bang for the buck. Thanks again, to all.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby MC2 » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 13:29:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mkwin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')k, a 15 per cent increase, if it occurred, would not begin to replace the losses we are incurring in the destruction of money (debt) through the tens of trillions of derivatives (some say hundreds of trillions).


The 15% increases have been occuring over the past 5 years following the dotcom bust. That is where all this debt came from.

Derivatives are not really the issue, they have the potential to cause a wild fire of insolvancy though the financial system. However, they are a zero-sum game the loser pays the winner, there is no destruction of capital just a transfer and the derivatives are themselves not capital just contracts.


This is true - this is what is meant by "the inflation has already occurred." It's also correct that the derivatives are leveraged up to 200:1, so real losses are orders of magnitude less than the hundreds of trillions out there. BUT, these are still real losses for someone to absorb. Got a spare couple of trillion to backstop all this? I don't. Ben B. doesn't, and the bet many are taking is that our .gov does. I don't think so, and that's why I'm not inflationist in my orientation. That's why PMs will drop.
User avatar
MC2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 26 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby roccman » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 13:34:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MC2', ' ')Got a spare couple of trillion to backstop all this? I don't. Ben B. doesn't, and the bet many are taking is that our .gov does. I don't think so, and that's why I'm not inflationist in my orientation. That's why PMs will drop.


Sovereign wealth funds do.

In fact, the Rothschilds fortune is estimated at some 400-500 Trillion.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby mkwin » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 16:49:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')hese are still real losses for someone to absorb. Got a spare couple of trillion to backstop all this? I don't. Ben B.


They are paper losses across a vast array of companies or funds, which simply transfer to the other side of the contract. So one lot of parties will lose but it will just transfer to the other party. The banks are just as likely, if not more likely, to be on the winning side as the losing side and there is zero effect on money supply.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n fact, the Rothschilds fortune is estimated at some 400-500 Trillion.


Estimated by anti-semites on the lunatic fringed. That figure is complete non-sense. It would mean the Rothschild own everything on earth many times over.

The Rothschilds were the richest merchant family in the 19th century but they failed to break into the American market. They are now worth a couple of billion pounds and operate a small investment brokerage in London - NM Rothschild’s and Sons.

They do not control the Bank of England, contrary to the mythology of the anti-NWO anti-semite movement. The Bank of England was nationalized in 1949.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby shortonoil » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 17:34:55

mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey are paper losses across a vast array of companies or funds, which simply transfer to the other side of the contract. So one lot of parties will lose but it will just transfer to the other party.


If this were true ABK and MBI would be selling for $100 per share, their reinsurer would protect them, but R Channel is broke. If there is counterparty default there will be losses, and those losses in a complete meltdown will be measured in $100s of billions, if not trillions. Those losses are going to contract the money supply. Devs are ONLY a zero sum game if everyone pays up, but everyone is not going to pay up. The astronomical leverage that we see being used insures it. JPM is levearged out 37:1, Fannie and Freddy have insurance operations that are leveraged out 200:1.

Our currency is only a promise to pay a debt, and when no one is sure if the other guy is going to pay, the currency goes poof! There is going to be a lot of money destroyed when this comes apart. Maybe all of it!


about KD

He is a tremendous technician, but his economic models suck pond water. An economic model that doesn’t factor in PO is an archeological relic!
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 18:29:17

Shortonoil,
Please, for us newbs, what happens when all that money gets destroyed? Okay, we got less money, or at least, the investors have less money, banks can't loan if they don't have reserves, and credit disappears. Net result, everybody's broke, as in 1930's? Got that.

How does it resolve? Is this all contingent upon what Central Banks and Govts do? Or, as some say (maybe you), it is too big for them to do anything significant? What odds do you give that our currency will be inflated to destruction trying to save the banks, yet not be enough, so it deflates anyway?

Sorry if I sound stupid. I can almost tell an economic model from a wooden ship model....
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby mkwin » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 18:36:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f this were true ABK and MBI would be selling for $100 per share


They are bond insurance companies not derivative insurance companies. They insure the income stream from bonds. They are in trouble because some of their exposure, to mortgage backed bonds, look like it may default hence they will have to pay out 10's of billions just like any insurance company if the risk that thier clients were insuring against comes to pass. They have nothing to do with derivatives.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f there is counterparty default there will be losses, and those losses in a complete meltdown will be measured in $100s of billions, if not trillions. Those losses are going to contract the money supply.



Maybe I am missing something, but I just cannot see where the capital would go? Any loss would be counter-party paper gains, which is not capital. The firm on the losing side that went insolvent would simply be unable to pay the paper gain to the winning party but no capital would be taken out of circulation. The winning counter-party would lose their paper gain but none of their capital unless they had paid an option premium. In which case, they may be able to recover it in the liquidation process or if the firm had spent the premium, the capital would have been transferred to another element of the economy before, not destroyed. Could you explain in simple steps the mechanism that would lead to a destruction of actual capital?

It does seem, however, that the risk of a deflationary depression is growing by the day despite the work of the FED. The days of easy money are simply over but I think it is more to do with asset deflation and the destruction of debt rather than derivatives.
User avatar
mkwin
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 625
Joined: Fri 01 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby Bas » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 18:40:25

biggest commodity bust in 50 years, yet so small it's only a correction really; a sign of things to come?
Bas
 

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby MC2 » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 19:39:56

Impeach Bush over this Bear Stearns shit:

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/2008 ... earns.html
User avatar
MC2
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 230
Joined: Mon 26 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby shortonoil » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 19:53:38

mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe I am missing something, but I just cannot see where the capital would go?


If you get a promissory note for $100 from your neighbor then you find out that he moved to Australia before he paid you, your money went poof.

A derivative is an insurance claim for a term to pay if something happens. It gives you an income stream. You calculate the PV of the instrument (the income stream) and then put it on your books. If the counterparty, the agent that bought it from you, goes broke and can no longer make his monthly payments it becomes worthless. You have to write that off your books, which should go against your capital, since you put it there to begin with as an asset.

Trillions$ have been created this way, if the counterparty can’t pay (they go broke), trillions$ will have to be written off. What makes it worse is the agent that sold the derivative then went to a bank and borrowed money against it. When the first party can’t pay the originator of the instrument, the originator can’t pay the bank which put the loan on their books as an asset.

The bank then turned around, sterilizes it, and goes to the FED and borrows against the loan it gave the originator. Now many, many trillions goes poof.

Money, debt based fiat currency, is just a promise to pay a debt sometime in the future (the money in your pocket is a zero pass coupon). It has no intrinsic value, except the paper it is written on. It is worth no more than the integrity of and ability to pay by the issuer.
User avatar
shortonoil
False ETP Prophet
False ETP Prophet
 
Posts: 7132
Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: VA USA
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:01:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '[')b]mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe I am missing something, but I just cannot see where the capital would go?


If you get a promissory note for $100 from your neighbor then you find out that he moved to Australia before he paid you, your money went poof.

A derivative is an insurance claim for a term to pay if something happens. It gives you an income stream. You calculate the PV of the instrument (the income stream) and then put it on your books. If the counterparty, the agent that bought it from you, goes broke and can no longer make his monthly payments it becomes worthless. You have to write that off your books, which should go against your capital, since you put it there to begin with as an asset.

Trillions$ have been created this way, if the counterparty can’t pay (they go broke), trillions$ will have to be written off. What makes it worse is the agent that sold the derivative then went to a bank and borrowed money against it. When the first party can’t pay the originator of the instrument, the originator can’t pay the bank which put the loan on their books as an asset.

The bank then turned around, sterilizes it, and goes to the FED and borrows against the loan it gave the originator. Now many, many trillions goes poof.

Money, debt based fiat currency, is just a promise to pay a debt sometime in the future (the money in your pocket is a zero pass coupon). It has no intrinsic value, except the paper it is written on. It is worth no more than the integrity of and ability to pay by the issuer.
Not to discount what you said, but does it ultimately matter? No actual value went anywhere. Just a bunch of numbers in somebody's book. You can't eat a derivative. You can't put it in your gas tank and drive to work. You can't live in it. Why should I care that it disappeared?

The money men are up to the same slight of hand chicanery they've always been. What's new?
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby Homesteader » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:13:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('shortonoil', '[')b]mkwin said:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')aybe I am missing something, but I just cannot see where the capital would go?


If you get a promissory note for $100 from your neighbor then you find out that he moved to Australia before he paid you, your money went poof.

A derivative is an insurance claim for a term to pay if something happens. It gives you an income stream. You calculate the PV of the instrument (the income stream) and then put it on your books. If the counterparty, the agent that bought it from you, goes broke and can no longer make his monthly payments it becomes worthless. You have to write that off your books, which should go against your capital, since you put it there to begin with as an asset.

Trillions$ have been created this way, if the counterparty can’t pay (they go broke), trillions$ will have to be written off. What makes it worse is the agent that sold the derivative then went to a bank and borrowed money against it. When the first party can’t pay the originator of the instrument, the originator can’t pay the bank which put the loan on their books as an asset.

The bank then turned around, sterilizes it, and goes to the FED and borrows against the loan it gave the originator. Now many, many trillions goes poof.

Money, debt based fiat currency, is just a promise to pay a debt sometime in the future (the money in your pocket is a zero pass coupon). It has no intrinsic value, except the paper it is written on. It is worth no more than the integrity of and ability to pay by the issuer.
Not to discount what you said, but does it ultimately matter? No actual value went anywhere. Just a bunch of numbers in somebody's book. You can't eat a derivative. You can't put it in your gas tank and drive to work. You can't live in it. Why should I care that it disappeared?

The money men are up to the same slight of hand chicanery they've always been. What's new?


I'll hazard a guess that it matters because it is like liquidity vs. solvency matters. Especially when the companies involved are the largest banking and investment companies in the country (world?) with millions of customers, municipalities, pension funds, etc. . .
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:24:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Homesteader', 'I')'ll hazard a guess that it matters because it is like liquidity vs. solvency matters. Especially when the companies involved are the largest banking and investment companies in the country (world?) with millions of customers, municipalities, pension funds, etc. . .
The money men will figure out some way to fudge the numbers in their books, screw the rest of us, and avert the "crisis". They always do. The uber rich will get even richer, the rest of us will get poorer, but not so poor that we do anything about it. What else is new?

Do you guys seriously not see the farce in all this? History is an unrelenting series of these supposed crises that the money men create and then we have to bail out. This is not real. No wealth "evaporated". It's a bunch of con men playing with numbers and trying to convince the rest of us that there's a crisis so they can screw us out of a bunch of money.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby Homesteader » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:25:52

Yeah, I do.
User avatar
Homesteader
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1856
Joined: Thu 12 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Economic Nomad

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:28:50

If I understand it correctly, we are impacted by all this chicanery when the banks who lose this notional money, can no longer loan money out, because the notional money was their reserve backing for loans.

Businesses like the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker all are operating on borrowed money. Without being able to conitually "roll" their notes, they can't make payroll, or pay suppliers, and the whole works comes to a grinding halt for lack of credit to lubricate the process until the businesses can collect their due from customers. Businesses are living hand to mouth like J6P, or worse.

Anybody knows more than me and can explain this better, straighten me out here.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:31:47

It's the American Way--you buy low, sell high, collect early, pay late, and do it all on borrowed money. I think the term is "undercapitalized".
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:31:51

This is a naive question, I'm sure, but, why are all businesses operating on borrowed money?

(I own a business which does not operate on borrowed money)
Ludi
 

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby patience » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:36:22

Ludi,
I'm like you, and solvent, but I think the idea is "growth" at any price. That is, anyone that can raise some significant money can borrow many times that amount if he has good credit history and a good business plan. Then, they go into business WAAAY over their heads in debt, attempting to make a gain on the borrowed money (leverage) as well as their own. This all depends on "positive cash flow". It's a Ponzi scheme, and a vast majority of big business is doing it.
Local fix-it guy..
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:37:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('patience', 'B')usinesses like the butcher, the baker, and the candlestick maker all are operating on borrowed money. Without being able to conitually "roll" their notes, they can't make payroll, or pay suppliers, and the whole works comes to a grinding halt for lack of credit to lubricate the process until the businesses can collect their due from customers.


Yeah, except that if that happened, the money men would have no-one left to fleece. If it got bad enough, the butchers might even riot and burn down some of the money men's mansions. They won't let that happen. They will engineer some massively expensive government bailout so they get billions and we the taxpayers get to pay it off. That's what always happens.

Oil is a real tangible thing. You can hold it in your hand. Decreasing availability of oil will have real tangible effects on our society. This credit crunch BS is a charade. It's a bunch of money men playing games and scamming people.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Biggest commodities bust in 52 years

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 23 Mar 2008, 20:39:29

This is another probably dumb question: would any of this even be possible without fiat money? If we had the gold standard or whatever type of standard besides debt, are massive bubbles and implosions possible?

Just a theoretical question
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron