by evilgenius » Sat 22 Mar 2008, 12:42:42
I have always been annoyed by Simmons example. No, I don't need more than that one dollars worth of water for a day at .10 a cup while if I drive an American distance in relatively inefficient cars it will wind up costing a lot more than a dollar a day. If he thinks that the calculus can be done on a per cup basis he has it wrong. I do see, however, that there is plenty of room for the economics of the situation to force higher efficiency and destroy demand vis a vis unnecessary travel. What he is saying is that per cup the price can go up quite a bit before the world energy situation becomes untenable. The bottom line is that the example breaks down fairly quickly but it works to show a reality to those that don't have the time or inclination to listen. He should start to introduce a second example so that as people begin to listen he can both attract them and keep their attention over time.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."