Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby btu2012 » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 22:58:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') think you're right, though, that a life with greed and self-interest as the only guiding principles probably isn't going to give you a better quality society than a bunch of Godless communists.


The West fared better than communized countries inasmuch as it managed to preserve some of its pre-Capitalist ethics intact (which in this case originated with Christian ethics and Greek/Roman concepts of virtue). The growing problems in the West are mainly due to the gradual abandonment of those moral principles.

Just for clarity, I think that US Christian fundamentalists do not espouse those principles.

The ideological focus on class struggle, race, values etc is based on a conflictual view of society, which originated with the abandonment of those core principles. We endlessly discuss technical details about social and economic organization etc without ever addressing the glaring fact that we implicitly rely on ideologies of conflict which originated with a mechanistic and amoral view of human beings.

Btu
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:16:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')She and PMS would have run off together on her first day here.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Think about what the pillow talk would be like. They would keep interrupting each other.


LOL!!!!!! And talking about their poor-little-rich-kid childhoods, Oh the trauma!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby btu2012 » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:20:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'L')OL!!!!!! And talking about their poor-little-rich-kid childhoods, Oh the trauma!


Another important point. All major ideologues lacked the experience of true suffering and humility. This automatically disqualifies them to speak about the condition of mankind.

Unfortunately for your beliefs, Hitler and other Volkish ideologues lacked that experience as well.

The truth of human nature does not reveal itself to the pampered.

Btu
Last edited by btu2012 on Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:23:34, edited 1 time in total.
only the paranoid survive
User avatar
btu2012
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon 24 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: third from the sun
Top

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:22:40

True, true.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby BigTex » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:24:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', '
')She and PMS would have run off together on her first day here.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Think about what the pillow talk would be like. They would keep interrupting each other.


LOL!!!!!! And talking about their poor-little-rich-kid childhoods, Oh the trauma!


...
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby Newfie » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:30:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('fireplaceguy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '.')..If capitalism really worked to make for efficiency then we would have a decent mass transit system in the US.

One of the things that makes me worry less about PO is that we have so much slop, inefficiency, in the system that we can get by with much less than we use now by doing simple things. That will flatten the curve of the collapse but not stop the collapse.
You're wrong. Dead wrong. Building mass transit is the PERFECT way to ADD slop and inefficiency into our system.

Mass transit works for Manhattan, and the majority of the millions who commute in daily for work. I use it whenever I'm there. It almost works in DC, and I use it about half the time there as well, though taxis or a car are necessary if you're there on business.

As to the rest of the country, here's an insight: I studied mass transit efficiency for a letter I wrote to the editor of the Denver Post years ago. At the time, I compared West Germany (before the wall fell) with the state of Colorado and found the following: West Germany's land area was fractionally smaller than Colorado's, yet there were 25 times more people in West Germany (and 1900 additional breweries!). Colorado's largest metropolitan area had under 2 million people, where there were several cities in West Germany that surpassed that rather handily...

Population density equates directly to the use and efficiency of mass transit. This is the overriding difference in the efficiency of mass transit in European countries vs. the US. Culture has nothing to do with it. If the Germans had been transplanted here 300 years ago, they would have spread out just as we did (after all, our population largely came from countries with smaller land areas and high density). Mass transit in North America would be just as big a joke as it is today, only we'd be telling it in a different language.

Capitalists (who risk their own money) would never be stupid enough to build expensive transit infrastructure where the customer base isn't adequate to support it. So, capitalism actually makes for very high efficiency. How? By not squandering money and vast natural resources on useless projects. (These gov't morons can't run a transit bus at break-even yet you want them take over health care? Fool!)

Your thinking creates inefficiencies! One of my great worries is this: Just as gloabl energy production is peaking, so are the stifling inefficiencies of social(ist) programs (such as mass transit) and the suffocating noose of regulation. As energy becomes more and more dear, an increasing percentage of the jobs that remain will be carried out over the phone and the web. The rest of us will be gardening...

Who needs light rail for that???


Well....not to screw with your head but.............I completely agree with you, and I work in transit. Well maybe not completely, for I have (of recent) come to the conclusion that mass transit is part of the problem.

You are absolutely right that mass transit does not make sense in the hinterlands (see I know German too.) Nor are the systems in NY or DC are "efficient." They are run by big, ugly, nasty, inefficient bureaucratic, political, make work, political, .............ARG!!! You get the idea. They could be SOOOOO much MORE efficient than they are. That was my point, not to pick on mass transit per se but that humans, as a group, are pretty inefficient. To make Rand's point, it is the few that lead and drag the rest along.

So why is mass transit part of the problem? Because both NYC and DC and, and, and will not be sustainable Post Peak. Others will argue that, right now, Manhattan is very energy efficient, in comparison to the rest of the country. At some point in the decline the equation will change. McMansion has some yard to grow vegetables, and a roof to collect water, and sunshine. The poor slob in the tenement will be almost totally without resources. We don't need to cram more poor slobs into that box. But these are long range worries, not for my lifetime, I hope.

Now, if you want to bash mass transit why not start a separate thread on that topic?
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby BigTex » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:32:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'T')rue, true.


I know PMS must have suffered in conjunction with his Dad's passing.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: The Ayn Rand Punching Bag Thread

Postby BigTex » Tue 26 Feb 2008, 23:45:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')
Well....not to screw with your head but.............I completely agree with you, and I work in transit. Well maybe not completely, for I have (of recent) come to the conclusion that mass transit is part of the problem.

[...]

Now, if you want to bash mass transit why not start a separate thread on that topic?


Yeah, you guys need to take that outside. We're just bashing Ayn Rand in here.
:)
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron