Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Hating the way people dress.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Hating the way people dress.

Unread postby Riddick » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 13:46:52

More lunacy brewing in this country.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/02/09/low.p ... index.html
"Your failure to be informed does not make me a wacko." - John Loeffler

December 23, 2012
User avatar
Riddick
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hiding from the All-Seeing Eye

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 20:17:52

I think it's more about prudishness than about fashion.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby KiddieKorral » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 20:50:01

Sheesh. I think that law is ridiculous, and I'm the resident prude here! :razz:
American by birth, Muslim by choice, Southern by the grace of God!
User avatar
KiddieKorral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 28° N 81° W

Good Luck

Unread postby EnviroEngr » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 21:29:26

Undoubtedly, you'll be safe in Falwellville then, should you visit!

Keep you hair up and show no hint of a garment that might strike sin deep in the hearts of the secretly self-hating but morally upright hedonists who parade around under the pretenses of religious, right and politically correct citizens.
-------------------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
-------------------------------------------
(---------< Temet Nosce >---------)
__________________________
User avatar
EnviroEngr
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin

Unread postby mindfarkk » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 21:33:03

lets add a clause against cleavage. in fact, i think long skirts and veils are in order.
what, me worry?
User avatar
mindfarkk
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Clothes?

Unread postby EnviroEngr » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 21:45:00

There.

That should help.
-------------------------------------------
| Whose reality is this anyway!? |
-------------------------------------------
(---------< Temet Nosce >---------)
__________________________
User avatar
EnviroEngr
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richland Center, Wisconsin

Unread postby Riddick » Wed 09 Feb 2005, 23:20:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mindfarkk', 'l')ets add a clause against cleavage. in fact, i think long skirts and veils are in order.


Are you nuts? I love cleavage.....it soothes me. :-D
"Your failure to be informed does not make me a wacko." - John Loeffler

December 23, 2012
User avatar
Riddick
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hiding from the All-Seeing Eye

Unread postby gg3 » Thu 10 Feb 2005, 00:27:22

Personally I think that style is gross, because it comes directly from "prison style" with the low-hanging pants meant to resemble the poor fit of prison uniforms. And kids who run around glorifying gangsterism are in my opinion full of sh*t.

On the other hand, what's far more obnoxious is government-legislated fashion. Someone should challenge that law on Constitutional grounds because it is a) an infringement of a form of expression that is not specifically obscene (i.e. there is no nudity involved), b) discriminatory against youth (you can bet it won't be enforced against workmen with loose suspenders), c) unconstitutionally vague (tell me, dear legislators, what exactly is a "lewd manner"?)

Re. "lewd manner," it's quite clear this is targeted against kids, i.e. 12 and up. To be terribly blunt about this, I think some of those legislators and their puritanical constituents get secretly aroused when they see young teenagers dressed that way. In other words, what they're really protecting against is their own pedophile urges. And *that* is *truly* disgusting.

Meahwhile, the youth of Virginia should take to wearing plain white jockey shorts (i.e. the most unmistakable form of underwear) on the outside of their regular pants. Just get the underpants a couple sizes too large and put 'em on over their pants. Or perhaps underwear with a printed design that shows the old slogan "Don't Tread On Me!"

And let the battle begin!
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Thu 10 Feb 2005, 08:58:57

Virginia has been targeting lots of stuff against kids lately. Can't drive between certain hours but old enough to be drafted.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby sampo » Thu 10 Feb 2005, 13:02:46

this is nothing more than age discrimination and racism.

i'm glad i got out of that backward racist state as soon as i finished college.
User avatar
sampo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Riddick » Thu 10 Feb 2005, 15:49:06

I agree with gg3: I hate all those hip-gasta wannabees but this law is ridiculous. What in the hell is next? You can't wear blue attire?
"Your failure to be informed does not make me a wacko." - John Loeffler

December 23, 2012
User avatar
Riddick
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hiding from the All-Seeing Eye

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 11 Feb 2005, 18:31:48

http://abcnews.go.com/US/LegalCenter/wi ... ?id=490240
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')roopy-Pants Bill Dropped in Va. Senate

:-D
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron