Thanks for all of the interesting comments.
I imagine the article can be read from the "doomer" perspective. I suppose Neil intended it to be that way. He had a 1,200 word limit, so I suppose he had to find an angle and go with it.
I'm not sure what the belief in God or an afterlife a.k.a. religion has to do with the article. I'm all ears for this.
I think this a series of articles that Neil and the WSJ will be writing. Of course, it will all depend on how prices go. If they go down (due to a global recession), I don't suspect the WSJ will stay on track.
The WSJ has done several peak oil stories now. But, as you note, they usually don't use the words "peak oil".
For the video, Neil interviewed me on camera for 30 minutes, and then asked for the 5-minute tour of the house. Go figure that the video editing person in NYC decided to go with the short-term preparedness angle.
Clearly, I'm planning for BOTH an unlikely but rapid collapse (thus my use of the term "insurance") and for a slow yet painful decline (my community outreach and plans for the sustainable house).
I don't know what to say about Cheney or the various choices of the administration. One could easily take the position that everything the administration has done is to keep the USA in the position of having "their" 20 mbpd no matter what. We will see.
For more analysis (of mine) on Neil's article about me, I invite you to visit...
http://valuesystem.livejournal.com/29855.html
Cheers,
-- Aaron Wissner