Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby TheDude » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 11:04:47

A Quantitative Assessment of Future Net Oil Exports by the Top Five Net Oil Exporters

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')y Jeffrey J. Brown and Samuel Foucher

There is increasing concern worldwide about global oil supplies, especially in the context of a global oil production peak. However, what really matters to oil importing countries is world net oil export capacity, and we are deeply concerned that the top five net oil exporting countries, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Norway, Iran and the UAE (United Arab Emirates), collectively accounting for about half of current world net oil exports, in aggregate are going to show an ongoing decline in net oil exports, continuing an aggregate net export decline that began in 2006.

Some recent net export decline rates in other countries, such as Indonesia and the UK, have been quite severe.

Indonesia exported 780,000 bpd (Total Liquids) in 1996. Eight years later, Indonesia was a net oil importer.

In a similar fashion, the United Kingdom in 1999 was a major net oil exporter, exporting more than one million barrels per day (mbpd). Seven years later, the UK was a net importer.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, how does the simplistic ELM compare to real world case histories?

Actually, two case histories, Indonesia and the UK, showed, as described above, sharper net export declines than the ELM. Figure 3 shows the year-over-year changes in net exports, from the start of the most recent production declines to the (apparent) final year of net exports (EIA, Total Liquids) for the ELM, the UK and Indonesia.


Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')maller oil exporters like Angola can and will increase their net exports, but smaller exporters, just like smaller oil fields, tend to have sharper production peaks and more rapid net export declines than do the larger net exporters. And offsetting many of the gains by some smaller exporters will be sharp declines in net exports from other smaller exporters like Mexico, the #2 source of imported crude oil into the US, which will probably approach zero net oil exports by 2014.

Declining net oil exports will inevitably result, absent a severe decline in demand in importing countries, in continued rapid increases in oil prices, as oil importing countries furiously bid against each other for declining oil exports.

In simplest terms, we are concerned that the very lifeblood of the world industrial economy—net oil export capacity—is draining away in front of our very eyes, and we believe that it is imperative that major oil importing countries like the United States launch an emergency Electrification of Transportation program--electric light rail and streetcars--combined with a crash wind power program.


We're in an emptying bathtub, with a pool pump attached to the drain.

Image
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby Twilight » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 15:53:10

Export Land . . . that strange phenomenon where oil exporters grow their economies. 8O

It is a good read, comes strongly recommended.

Most energy exporters (outside of Africa) are industrialising, more and more of their energy is consumed domestically. As producers of huge energy surpluses, so far they have seen no need for world market pricing of energy within their borders. In the ME Gulf, cheap energy is treated as a perk that comes naturally with their position. Soaring prices have compensated for any effect rising domestic consumption might have had on revenues. Few countries have seen real incentives to conserve. In the meantime, the very countries that depend on imported energy are sending equipment the other way, equipment with which producers consume more. You don't need to be a peak oil doomer to see which way this trade ends.

Sometimes stating the obvious is revolutionary.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby steam_cannon » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 15:55:18

Great find, you are "The Dude"! :-D

It's really a shocking thought that we will be losing exports from Mexico soon. Then probably the Mexican government will face instability as their tax oil base evaporates. Then we may have a further crisis of unemployed immigrants pouring over the boarders.

Should be interesting...
[smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby steam_cannon » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 16:36:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'I')n the meantime, the very countries that depend on imported energy are sending equipment the other way, equipment with which producers consume more. You don't need to be a peak oil doomer to see which way this trade ends.
But there are still several ways it might end... Countries that are weak, we may simply destroy their need for oil and countries that lack food production might be encouraged economically to cut back on internal energy use...

The Carrot and The Stick

Food for Crude
Image
Saudi Arabia has officially abandoned growing wheat due to water and climate change issues. So Saudi Arabia is likely to eventually give in to the demands of whoever can keep their population fed. This could be one explanation for the unusual banking arrangements between the US and Saudi Arabia, in our favor.

Bombs for Conservation
Image
Besides fighting Iraq's switch from the petrodollar, one could also argue that we also reversed their industrialization by bombing them into the conservation stone age... So it's possible that many export countries may be similarly encouraged to conserve. Not to say that "Shock and Awe" worked very perfectly to this end, but I'm sure it will be considered again. Threatening "Energy Security" has been introduced into common usage as a reason for war, so I'm sure there will be wars over exporters "holding back".

Both of these options only buy time, but they are some cards that will probably be played...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'S')ometimes stating the obvious is revolutionary.
Ain't that the truth...
Last edited by steam_cannon on Thu 10 Jan 2008, 17:02:00, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby TheDude » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 16:38:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', 'G')reat find, you are "The Dude"! :-D


Vielen dank, mein herr. You too, Walter. Both yuz plus Pup got my vote for poster of the year.

Found out today that "Free Trade" won't "help" us to drag every last barrel from down south: If our NAFTA Partners Can Have National Energy Programs, Why Can't We? Canadians aren't so lucky.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby steam_cannon » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 16:52:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'V')ielen dank, mein herr. You too, Walter. Both yuz plus Pup got my vote for poster of the year.
Vielen Dank! :-D
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby Pixie » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 17:04:45

I noticed this article, too, and found it to be about the most informative I have seen on the subject of peak oil in a long time. It helps me clarify my expectations for the future. Basically, the USA-Canada unit will achieve energy self-sufficiency by about 2030--BECAUSE NO ONE WILL BE SELLING!!!

How much will we be producing? Far less than we do now. Also, we have passed the North American peak for natural gas. We're still fixed for coal for a few decades, so that and the Canadian oil sands will probably be all we've got.
Just another tofu-munching bike-riding Rambo(/Rambette)
User avatar
Pixie
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue 05 Sep 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: New work by Westexas and Khebab on the ELM

Postby Twilight » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 17:23:08

I agree, the message here is that current oil importers will need to arrange an exclusive deal, colonize a producer, or get used to using less than they produce now. Not only will this game be interesting in itself, it will be doubly spiced up in coming as a complete surprise to the players.

[smilie=new_popcornsmiley.gif]
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron