Geez, I am in Canada of all places, and heat my 2,100 sq ft detached home by natural gas, and my bill works out to about $1400 a year, including water heating and there are five of us here.
So, if somebody has a $3,000 annual oil bill, but if they could substitute for gas, even if the investment was as much as $5,000, plus some upgraded insulation, it would be a great financial benefit it would give a two or three year payback.
Maine borders on Quebec, and I know that much of Quebec now has piped natural gas, as far east as Quebec City at least, it would not take much to run a line south, so you'd think.
In fact, it looks like more gas is on its way for our buds south of the 45th parallel -- see this article
Quebec heralds billion dollar methane project
" The port is expected to serve Quebec, Ontario and the northeastern United States.
But Bechard moved on Wednesday to allay concerns that most of the gas coming through the port would be sold south of the border.
"It is part of the diversification of our sources of energy," he said. "Potentially there could be some going to the United States, but there is also a need for natural gas in Quebec."
Bechard added that developing a port in Cacouna doesn't hurt the chances of a similar project planned closer to Quebec City.
The proposed terminal for liquefied natural gas at Rabaska, which is headed by Gaz Metro Limited Partnership (TSX: GZM.UN), is being reviewed by Quebec environmental officials after recent public hearings."
For that matter, why couldn't Maine set up its own methane port? You'd think the ships would have a shorter distance to travel that way.