Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Thermostat Thread (merged)

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

How low is your thermostat in winter?

Poll ended at Wed 28 Feb 2007, 20:49:04

70 or more (I am an energy hog!)
4
No votes
65-69
22
No votes
60-64
16
No votes
55-59
7
No votes
 
Total votes : 49

Re: Free Programable Thermostat

Unread postby steam_cannon » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 12:47:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mommy22', 'A')ny others getting an offer like that from your power company?
My sister mentioned something like that last year about her power company in Holyoke, MA.

I figure as natural gas prices keep going up and availability of gas becomes more strained, to prevent shortages, severe pressure drops and major damage to infrastructure, gas companies and gas fired electric companies, are likely to try to get their customers to reduce use. It's not out of the goodness of their hearts, but "we need to cool down consumption" is not a reason likely to find it's way into a press release.

When gas loses pressure pilot lights go out and all sorts of problem happen when the pressure comes back. So it may be that if supplies are low, it will cost a company a lot less to give everyone a "Free Thermostat" then to lose all their infrastructure + lawsuits. Plus they probably figured a way for the government to pay them back for their energy savings plan, tax credits or whatever. So you are probably paying for those Free Thermostats though higher taxes.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Free Programable Thermostat

Unread postby FoxV » Fri 30 Nov 2007, 13:41:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Niagara', 'T')hey installed a timer gadget which would kill power
to the heater during peak hours, so your water would reheat during the night. The tank was also wrapped with an insulating blanket to help keep the water hot. They offered a cash incentive to have the system installed, around $200 I think.

yeah I remember that deal, my mother signed up for it. Nothing like having deep government pockets to solve a problem (the whole scheme was government subsidized).

I lowered my water temp to one notch above the temperature of a hot shower and wrapped my tank in a blanket (tin foil covered bubble wrap, not the Arctic certified sleeping bag they used). The end result; dropped my hot water energy use by 50% and the heater only turns on when somebody uses the hot water (ie only the morning and the night).

Total savings: $15/month
Total cost: $30

Anyways, the free programmable thermostat sounds on par with the water heating scheme. Since installing mine I can't say the energy savings has been more than 5% (and I'm using pretty drastic settings). It may be something that's worth doing yourself if the Thermostat is not that expensive. But to pay for advertisement and an installation crew; total waste of money.
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Free Programable Thermostat

Unread postby mistel » Sat 01 Dec 2007, 20:28:16

I have a bit of a bone to pick with my local NGas Utility. I have and electric water heater so I only use N Gas for heat. But I also have a wood stove so I turn on the furnace a little later than most and turn it off a little sooner. So I only use N Gas for about 6 months of the year but I still get a bill with a "service charge" all summer. I have asked about having the meter shut-off for 6 months, but that would require someone to make a decision outside the box, so forget about that.

I think next spring I will see if I can not pay my bill and get cut-off for 6 months.

Peter
User avatar
mistel
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun 20 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Free Programable Thermostat

Unread postby Blacksmith » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 06:04:24

A lot of people here cut off their gas for the summer, they just ask for a termination of service. When they turn the service back on in the fall they have to pay an installation fee of $35.00. If you default on your bill the cost of reinstatement will be much higher.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Thermostat Setting?

Unread postby Blacksmith » Sun 02 Dec 2007, 06:20:56

We keep our temperature at 15 degrees C, however, when I put on the wood stove and the I have trouble keeping it below 20 degrees C. Before we super insulated the house keeping it lower was much easier.
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: Thermostat Setting?

Unread postby rdsaltpower » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 16:52:40

68 when home, 65 at night and 55 during work hours. I also burn wood as much as possible which results in 30.00 gas bill in January.
Just installed 9 inches of insulation under floor. Added 6 inches to attic last fall. I also installed insulation pads on all wall outlets in house. Got a nice fed. tax break on the insulation and three solar panels last year. House is 2000 sq, ft plus to heat.
User avatar
rdsaltpower
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed 30 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Thermostat Setting?

Unread postby strider3700 » Sun 09 Dec 2007, 18:50:59

The thermostat is turned off at the breaker and we're going to try just heating with wood this year. I did have to turn on the baseboard heaters for a few hours when I had a plastic tent set up inside for sanding and it was too close to the woodstove to be safe.

When turned on the thermostat was at 18 the 4 or so hours they ran cost me about 50 cents. With any luck that will be the most expensive heating day of this season
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: Thermostat Setting?

Unread postby gg3 » Mon 24 Dec 2007, 22:41:01

.
62 Fahrenheit on the thermostat.

At this very moment it's 63.7 in here, at 67% humidity.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermostat

Unread postby mattduke » Sun 06 Jan 2008, 19:11:04

Image

"What should be controversial in the proposed revisions to Title 24 is the requirement for what is called a "programmable communicating thermostat" or PCT. Every new home and every change to existing homes' central heating and air conditioning systems will required to be fitted with a PCT beginning next year following the issuance of the revision. Each PCT will be fitted with a "non-removable " FM receiver that will allow the power authorities to increase your air conditioning temperature setpoint or decrease your heater temperature setpoint to any value they chose. During "price events" those changes are limited to +/- four degrees F and you would be able to manually override the changes. During "emergency events" the new setpoints can be whatever the power authority desires and you would not be able to alter them."

Image
Image

AmericanThinker
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Sun 06 Jan 2008, 19:27:19

Image

End of problem.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby SILENTTODD » Sun 06 Jan 2008, 20:03:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '[')img]http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE3-955998reg.jpg[/img]

End of problem.


Are you suggesting the Law Abiding citizens of California short circuit these edicts…er laws, by creating their own Faraday Shields around such devices?

Well, as everyone in this state is aware, there is near zero enforcement of immigration laws which would have a Lot more impact on future energy use. So until that’s addressed, I’m gettin me some Foil!
Last edited by SILENTTODD on Sun 06 Jan 2008, 21:00:48, edited 1 time in total.
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby Niagara » Sun 06 Jan 2008, 20:14:49

In theory, it's a good idea. But forcing it down people's throats is clearly distasteful and reeks of George Orwell's "1984".

I better approach would be an opt-in plan whereby homeowners would receive a discount on their utilities if they choose to shift their cooling to off-peak hours.

We had a similar plan in Toronto where a timer box was installed on electric hot water heaters. The customer received a cash bonus for installing it.

Load shifting is a great idea. Thermal Cool Storage systems would work well in Cali-forn-i-a
User avatar
Niagara
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Thu 17 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mt. Hubbert Scenic Lookout

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby heroineworshipper » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 06:51:21

Not that anyone can afford new homes in Calif*, but Hillary has a better idea: get rid of all thermostats.
People first, then things, then dollars.
There will be enslavement, cannibalism, & zombie invasions.
User avatar
heroineworshipper
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 890
Joined: Fri 14 Jul 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Calif*

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby FreakOil » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 08:07:25

I guess I've been hoping for a long time that people would do something - anything - to lessen damage to the biosphere. But what if they won't? Should the government change their behavior for them, or should we let Joe Sixpack drive us off the cliff? This really cuts to the heart of the matter. What do you believe?

I prefer Niagara's idea of an opt-in plan and discounts for people who participated, but what if people didn't participate? How long do you let people make decisions of which the consequences, in totality, could destroy us all?

When do you take away the right to be stupid?
User avatar
FreakOil
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun 04 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Hong Kong

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby Fishman » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 10:04:23

FreakOil
Let's take away the right to be stupid, sounds great, who gets to pick? Do crack head females get sterilized? Do third generation welfare families get the same? Do YOU get to pick?
User avatar
Fishman
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2137
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Carolina de Norte

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby Leanan » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 12:35:55

At first blush, my reaction is outrage. How dare they reach into my house and change my thermostat?

But realistically, it kinda makes sense. They only change it if there's a power emergency. And you can change it back, unless it's a really, really bad power emergency. IOW, if the alternative is an unplanned blackout.

So the choice is...let them lower your thermostat, or sweat in the dark.

The issue here isn't environmental concerns. It's managing capacity. Probably half the people it will affect aren't home anyway. Those who are home can turn their thermostats back up if they want. If it's so bad they override the manual override, they're on the brink of the lights going out anyway.
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby mattduke » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 12:56:38

Rather than controlling our behaviors (with the threat of the police force if we refuse), how about broadcasting a "price" signal instead? When capacity is reached and the price spikes, "smart" thermostats automatically turn it down.
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby gnm » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 13:54:06

The currently installed version of this is called "the rolling blackout" - The only way you can truly control your power usage/availability is if you produce it. Otherwise you are at the mercy of their rather dubious planning and maintenance.

-G
gnm
 

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby Kingcoal » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 14:07:32

A tin foil hat for your thermostat, I love it! Ironic isn't it?
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: California Government To Remotely Control Your Thermosta

Unread postby Starvid » Mon 07 Jan 2008, 14:34:32

Seriously... This is so stupid. Stop blasting carbon into the atmosphere, build alternatives, and then enjoy vast amounts of clean dirt cheap power.

Image

Or if you are talking cooling, why not go for district cooling? It's dead easy technology. A cooling plant, insulated pipes to every house et voila!
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

PreviousNext

Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron