by UncoveringTruths » Thu 03 Jan 2008, 16:13:52
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('charliehelyes', 's')o your saying packaging doesnt add to the price of a product?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he measurement originated in the early Pennsylvania oil fields. In the early 1860s, when oil production began, there was no standard container for oil, so oil and petroleum products were stored and transported in barrels of all different shapes and sizes (barrels for beer, fish, molasses, turpentine, etc.). Both the 42-U.S.-gallon barrels (based on the old English wine measure, the tierce at 159 litres) and the 40-U.S.-gallon (151.4-litre) whiskey barrels were used. The 40-gallon whiskey barrel was the most common size used by early oil producers, since they were readily available at the time.
However, the Standard Oil Company shipped its oil in barrels that always contained 42 U.S. gallons, allowing an extra two gallons for evaporation and leakage. As Standard Oil came to monopolize 90% of U.S. oil production, customers began to refuse to accept anything less, and by 1866 the oil barrel was standardized at 42 U.S. gallons.
In 1911, the Standard Oil monopoly was broken up into 34 different companies, but its successor companies continued to grow and came to dominate the world oil trade.
Oil has not been shipped in barrels for a long time[2] but the "blue barrel" is still the standard unit for measurement and pricing of oil in the U.S. today.
There are for sure entities that require delivery in a 42 gallon barrel. However I would imagine that your theory would actually work in reverse in those situations where the buyer pays for the actual barrel for delivery purposes.