$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('archaen', 'B')e careful what you wish for in the detection of intelligent life department. I read a book by Charles Pellegrino(A physicist from Brookhaven national Labratories) called the
Killing Star. In the book he has an actual transcript of a discussion taken from the Valkyrie Brainstorming sessions(including Isaac Asimov, Richard Tuna and Jill Tarter) about Alien Civilizations and what we know about them and can expect from them.
We know with our current level of physics that is possible to have interstellar travel with antimatter drives which can propel objects up to a theoretical 92% the speed of light. The only down side is that we dont know if the matter density between the stars is too thick to safely travel at these speeds. It follows that if a technological race developed before us discovered thsi fact, then it would feel safe in communicating its presence; as it would be very hard for someone to destroy them. But our universe is totally silent, even out to safe distances of 100,000 light years or more. Remember, our universe is very old, and the chance that we are the first technological race to rise up is miniscule(this is taking the position that we are not the only technological race). If it was safe to transmit your location we would have most likely intercepted a signal from a race that developed thousand to millions of years before us. Now why would one be afraid to transmit your location in the universe?
When you put your thinking cap on what is it you can truly say about an high tech alien civilization?
The three things that came out of this meeting were:
1. Their survival will be more important than our survival
If an alien civilization has to choose its survival over ours it will be us biting the bullet everytime. Species don't survive by being self sacrificing.
2.Wimps don't become top dogsLets be realistic, a race that is technologically inclined is going to have to be the master over its environment. The species that has the chutzpah to break out of its gravity well will be agressive, intelligent, ambitous and ruthless when necessary.
3.They will assume the first two about us and rightfully soCombine this with the fact that the ships we know will work for interstellar travel are in and of themselves a terrible weapon. Just do a basic energy calculation of a fully loaded space shuttle traveling at 50% C using the old equation KE = 1/2*m*v^2. lets see here KE = 1/2*24,948 kg *(1.5*10^8 m/s)^2 = 2.807 * 10^20 Joules of energy. That is about 67,000 gigatons of energy stored on the ship which can then be directed at the planet.
It is impossible to tell if a ship visiting your system is friendly or on suicide run to take out your civilization. The other thing about relativistic weapons, you dont see them tilll they are almost there thanks to space time distortion.
It takes just a few logical steps to get the interstellar golden rule
"Do unto others as they would do unto you, and do it to them first."
Kind of reminds me of George Bush's war rhetoric .
Wouldn't it be ironic if the human race finally pulled itself together and over came peak oil just to be relativistically buck shot out of existance?
Im not saying this scenario is true or even likely; but if you have a signal from an intelligent race in proximity, the discusion from above becomes applicable.
do you have any solid proof? the one thing you forget is that they will be completely alien in nature and habits so applying human traits to them to try to describe them doesn't work.
no offense but it's you and the people who think like you who will cause a interstellar war if we make first contact. All because of the lose logic you use. you will run in guns blazing already self convinced that because we are violent they will be too so we might as well go ahead and attack them anyway before they have a chance to attack us.