Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 18:24:02

I offer to you the following article, which gives the latest information on the well-known longitudinal "Nun Study".

Please note particularly the phrase "[people] with positive attitudes ... tend to live longer than their glass-half-empty peers ..."

This research has been going on since 1986, and is providing extremely valuable information regarding not only long-life, but prevention of dementia.

I am NOT advocating "head in the sand". I am advocating thinking and acting creatively in the face of reality. Knowledge, then preparation, then action -- versus "the sky is falling - and there is nothing to be done!" (Also known as a symptom of Chronic Eeyore Syndrome in my practice of psychiatry.)

Please take a look!

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hAen ... QD8TM3AMG0
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby nutmeg » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 18:30:20

What if I am optimistic about doom and look forward to it?

What if the doomer lifestyle has made me a happier and healthier person?

That gave me an idea, I wonder if it's original -- "The Doomer Cookbook." or "Nutmeg's Doomer Living."
User avatar
nutmeg
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby satjeet » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 20:05:31

the view from Hubbert's Peak - a devastated, collapsing panorama - has freed me from some internalized, culturally based error - and yes I'm a doomer and I'm much happier!! Go figure!
satjeet
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 20:34:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('satjeet', 't')he view from Hubbert's Peak - a devastated, collapsing panorama - has freed me from some internalized, culturally based error - and yes I'm a doomer and I'm much happier!! Go figure!


Perhaps we are using the word "Doomer" with different connotations -- because, frankly, I am in agreement with your statement regarding the freeing nature of "seeing the light", so to speak. After all, someone far wiser than either of us said "The truth will set you free." :-)

I would go even further to say that I believe that the relocalization of commerce and community that will be mandated by the reality of the post-peak oil world will, in fact, be the means to the saving grace of human kind.

Yes, I believe lots of people are going to suffer and lots of people are going to die. But those who remain will by and large re-embrace (by necessity -- it will just be 'the way things are') a better way of living in community, and within themselves. And therefore the world will be a better place to be than it has been in the recent past and the present.

So even though I believe that things are going to change drastically, I don't see this as doom -- I see this as good and hopeful.

To me, being a doomer means thinking along these lines: "It's all coming crashing down, and there is nothing I can do on a personal level to change my life in order to make my future and the future of my loved ones and my community better after the crash."
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 00:07:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') would go even further to say that I believe that the relocalization of commerce and community that will be mandated by the reality of the post-peak oil world will, in fact, be the means to the saving grace of human kind.


I agree with the above.

I totally don't agree with this so called study, I think its propaganda as my personal experience doesn't jive with the idea that people with more optomistic attitudes live longer. Most of the population is rather pessimistic (as evidenced by the Jerry Springer wanna-bes who get attention by having chaotic lives) This is excepting of course the medicated population who are happier than before, but not by choice.

Also of the 6 people I know who have died; 5 of them were from cancer. Frankly I am tired of seeing nice people die of cancer. Why can't it take more of the assholes?
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Heineken » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 00:18:34

"Living longer"---what does that mean?

All the ailments, aches, and pains of old age. Slowly watching yourself lose all the functioning and abilities you hold dear.

Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there.

Take a walk down the hallway of a nursing home and you'll see what I mean.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 03:18:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', '
')I totally don't agree with this so called study, I think its propaganda as my personal experience doesn't jive with the idea that people with more optomistic attitudes live longer.

Also of the 6 people I know who have died; 5 of them were from cancer. Frankly I am tired of seeing nice people die of cancer. Why can't it take more of the assholes?


Your second paragraph (above) gives me a clue as to why you would call this a "so called study".

The Nun Study is extremely well-known and has been well-documented from its beginnings in 1986. As the article (the link to which I provided you) indicates, it actually was aimed at studying the effects of keeping one's mind active on the later development or non-development of Alzheimer's Disease, or other dementias.

However, if you have only lived long enough to know 6 people who have died, I am not surprised that you are not familiar with this study. I am guessing you might have been very young or perhaps not yet born when it was initiated.

As to cancer not taking any jerks off this planet ... well, of course, that is simply not true. Probably the 5 people you know who died of cancer were people you cared about -- good people in your life. So it might SEEM to you that only the good die of cancer. But please believe me, after years in the field of medicine (and several decades of life), I have seen cancer kill a multitude of people -- and it is no respecter of whether folks are nice or assholes.
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 03:27:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '"')Living longer"---what does that mean?

All the ailments, aches, and pains of old age. Slowly watching yourself lose all the functioning and abilities you hold dear.

Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there.

Take a walk down the hallway of a nursing home and you'll see what I mean.


You know, there are also a lot of young people with ailments, aches and pains -- losing their functions and abilities that they hold dear. Like our 10 year old nephew who has muscular dystrophy and is going downhill rapidly.

And there are a lot of old people who are full of life -- like my adoptive Mom and my Mother-in-Law, who are both 86 and both enjoying life and continuing to contribute to joy in the other peoples' lives. My grandfather lived to 103, and remarried for the 3rd time (outlived the first 2) at 101.

So I couldn't disagree more with your categorical statement that "Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there." I have known and do know a lot of old people having a great time being alive.
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Golgo13 » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 06:29:14

I guess it depends on what you're like if and when you get there.

I know I'd use a .357 for a PEZ dispenser before I ever got as bad as most the people in nursing homes are.
User avatar
Golgo13
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon 13 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 07:38:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lumpy', ' ')Your second paragraph (above) gives me a clue as to why you would call this a "so called study".

However, if you have only lived long enough to know 6 people who have died, I am not surprised that you are not familiar with this study. I am guessing you might have been very young or perhaps not yet born when it was initiated.


NOpe. not even close. YOu are obviously one of those people who assumes that becasue they have several decades to their lives (as do I) and the appropriate and equivalent suffering, that you are superiour enough to be able to make assumptions about people you don't know.

Some of us are just healthier and more long lived than you and your crowd, it would seem. I think working in a health care field is going to colour your reality because of the overwhelming number of deaths you've seen.

When I made the above comment I was talking about the older family members I have that could have had dimensia or alzheimers. There fore I discounted all the people I've deen hang themselves, or slit their wrists, or the guy who had his neck sliced to ribbons being punched through a plate glass window, and the guy who intestines were spread all over a highway... and the like.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s to cancer not taking any jerks off this planet ... well, of course, that is simply not true. Probably the 5 people you know who died of cancer were people you cared about -- good people in your life.


Again no. I might have cared about two, lets say three of them. But they are the only family members I've had die. I don't need to parade the vast numbers of younger people I've seen kick the bucket.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o it might SEEM to you that only the good die of cancer. But please believe me, after years in the field of medicine (and several decades of life), I have seen cancer kill a multitude of people -- and it is no respecter of whether folks are nice or assholes.


Please, save yourself and get out of the medical field. Its killing you.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Top

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Ludi » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 10:38:38

I'm a doomer, but many here on the boards have said I'm an optimist, even that I live in a happy fluffy fantasy world. So, I'm not sure where I fit in.


I don't expect to live to an advanced age, especially if somebody cuts my rope.
:)
Ludi
 

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Heineken » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 10:45:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lumpy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '"')Living longer"---what does that mean?

All the ailments, aches, and pains of old age. Slowly watching yourself lose all the functioning and abilities you hold dear.

Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there.

Take a walk down the hallway of a nursing home and you'll see what I mean.


You know, there are also a lot of young people with ailments, aches and pains -- losing their functions and abilities that they hold dear. Like our 10 year old nephew who has muscular dystrophy and is going downhill rapidly.

And there are a lot of old people who are full of life -- like my adoptive Mom and my Mother-in-Law, who are both 86 and both enjoying life and continuing to contribute to joy in the other peoples' lives. My grandfather lived to 103, and remarried for the 3rd time (outlived the first 2) at 101.

So I couldn't disagree more with your categorical statement that "Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there." I have known and do know a lot of old people having a great time being alive.


I don't dispute that my statement was a generalization. However, that fact doesn't preclude its validity for most of us. For example, at 52, I've noticed plenty of age-related decline, and I can see the handwriting on the wall. Doomers have the advantage of not feeling compelled to fool themselves with romantic notions.

I sincerely doubt that those octogenarians and centenarians in your life are living fully independently (if they are, they're outliers). I have two octogenarians who are completely dependent on me, so I know what's involved. I know about the dementia, the hemorrhoids, the arthritis, the constipation, the cancers, the broken hips . . .

I for one could never tolerate a life of dependence on others, or the humiliations often attendant on that.

In any case, in the future it will become difficult or impossible to survive to old age as living standards plummet due to PO, GW, and economic collapse. So your point here is moot.

Finally, there are so many potential confounding factors in the sort of research you quote that the outcomes are heavily freighted with doubt. I just don't buy it. Three of my grandparents were incredibly gloomy people and they all hobbled into their 90s.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 13:12:52

Two people writing responses to my posts (and the article) apparently did not read the article or my posts carefully.

I could line by line go through and point out to you why I say this - but that seems like a waste of time.

I was trying to share some solid research with you, to provide some hope in the face of the losses that are coming.

Being new to posting here, I could not believe it when I got on my computer this morning and found not one positive response from someone who had read the article. (The research is solid. Anyone who knows about research would recognize that one could hardly find a more homogenous group than the nuns of the Nun Study. And it is well known, well documented and well respected.)

Anyway, while my husband sat at his computer, reading the responses, I was vocalizing my amazement that NO ONE HERE 'GOT IT' -- that is to say the essence of the research and the hope that its results brings.

Then he (having been much longer on these boards than I) pointed out the obvious: "You can't bring doomers hope, because they don't want it. Being doomers is their identity. They like it like that. Take your message elsewhere, to someone who wants hope, and will take what you have offered and put it to good use in their lives."

This was coming from a man who is far more pessimistic than I. So this is not advice from a fluff-head, pie-in-the-sky guy.

And you know, I think he's right. Some of the people on PO boards remind me of the EMO/Goth teenagers who wallow in their angst -- don't just get through it the best they can and get on with living.

You doomers are as head-in-the-sand as people who ignore peak oil. You, too, are just as locked into your way of thinking, and find comfort in your caves of doom, it would seem. You don't seem to want to open your eyes to the possibility of hope. How sad.

He who has ears to hear, let him hear.
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Heineken » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 13:31:16

You haven't responded to any of the specific points I raised, Florence Nightingale. Instead, you used our disagreement with you as an opportunity to preach to us.

I did read the article. It only very briefly mentions the "optimism" variable.

The fact that the study was done in nuns does not exclude potential confounders and bias.

All those nuns were at the same institution---Notre Dame. The results have zero geographic generalizability.

Just because my long-range beliefs are those of a doomer doesn't mean I don't have plenty of positive attitudes in my daily life.

Similarly, there are people with cornucopian beliefs who lead gloomy personal lives.

It just doesn't wash, Lumpy.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 14:07:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') don't expect to live to an advanced age, especially if somebody cuts my rope.
:)


Some peoples children eh? just cause they have a knife they think they should use it on everything. :lol:

Lumpy, I think you are as guilty of not listening to us as we might be of you. The one kind of person you will find most often on this board are those who think using discernment is a gift and a priority. (Hey, I am trying to be nice cause you are new and take things personally... I am trying)

Just becuase someone says "this" is the best research out there doesn't mean there aren't plenty of other papers taht don't say the exact opposite. We aren't attacking you or your goal of bringing light to our dismal lives, we just don't agree with it... or parts of it.

Regardless, if you want to discuss it, then do so, but don't expect us to take it as gospel just becuase it was done by nuns (who wouldn't have any other agenda right?)

If we are such a waste of time to converse with then you are likely in the wrong place. Either way, welcome, good luck and I appoligize beforehand, but this isn't a play pen... it can get tough in here. But it is worth it, imo.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion
Top

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 14:16:15

YOu know what? I think like everything its a matter of perspective. You may see me as a doomer but I don't view myself that way at all.

So what if society crashes and we all wind up living like hobbits in earth houses, foraging all day for our food. I think I like that more than having to put up with this construct. I won't even start going on about my personal oppinions of what this life is doing to us, but I can't see that once the adjustment is made that living a much reduced life would be that much worse for us.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Lumpy » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 14:45:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'L')umpy, I think you are as guilty of not listening to us as we might be of you. The one kind of person you will find most often on this board are those who think using discernment is a gift and a priority. (Hey, I am trying to be nice cause you are new and take things personally... I am trying)

Just becuase someone says "this" is the best research out there doesn't mean there aren't plenty of other papers taht don't say the exact opposite. We aren't attacking you or your goal of bringing light to our dismal lives, we just don't agree with it... or parts of it.

Regardless, if you want to discuss it, then do so, but don't expect us to take it as gospel just becuase it was done by nuns (who wouldn't have any other agenda right?)

If we are such a waste of time to converse with then you are likely in the wrong place. Either way, welcome, good luck and I appoligize beforehand, but this isn't a play pen... it can get tough in here. But it is worth it, imo.


Well, to wax cliche-ish, I guess if I can't take the heat I should stay out of the kitchen. And if I want to play with the big kids, I'd better be ready to take a few "lumps" (no pun intended.) So thanks for reminding me of that.

Anyway, Amen to discernment as being gifts and priorities. You and I are, gulp, AGREEING! ;-)

Now that we are on relatively civil terms here, let me point out to you that
1. the study was not performed by nuns, they were the subjects of the study -- read the article carefully, please, before you attack it!
2. can you cite me your "plenty of other studies" that say the exact opposite" -- i.e. that exercising your brain does NOT help prevent dementia, and that a positive attitude does NOT contribute to a longer life

Slinging mud at one another gets us no where. Sharing info that might be valuable to one another does. (Not just you and me -- any of us on PO boards -- and humans in general.)

And I think it IS important to read one another's posts correctly. Someone here said something about my family not being as long-lived as other people's ... when I had just said that my folks are active octagenarians and even much older. That frustrates me -- not being carefully read. Maybe I'll have to get over it, but posting if people really don't read all the words does seem kind of pointless.

My choice, I guess, though - to keep posting/trying or not.

Thanks for the gesture of peace between us :-)
Last edited by Lumpy on Sun 23 Dec 2007, 15:32:45, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Lumpy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri 16 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Rural Western Idaho
Top

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 15:24:26

YOu can cite all the studies you want to... I don't believe them. I don't believe that there are that many optomistic people... out there. I think they chose passively pessimistic people for their test subjects, whose brains and bodies are going to shrivel up becuase of those reasons not because they might be pessimistic.

I think they may have a different definition of pessimism, becuase I don't think there are that many truly and noticeable optomistic people out there.

In my life I have only ever met 3 or 4 people I could truly call optomists (and I have met thousands of people). And though I liked them as people... frankly they drove me nuts!

Yes, they were lovely, and they loved bugging me about being such a skeptic and pessimist, and often tell me that I'd be happier as an optomist... but my life is not set up for that... maybe that's it... Maybe its that I live in a different socio-economic level than you do, cause I don't see many optomists down here.

I truly believe there are only maybe 1 optomist in 10,000 people. Maybe not as bad as that, but close, damned close. I think its more of this psychology (shrinkology) that tell us we are supposed to be happy and if we aren't then we need to see a shrink and fix it.

I think the rest of it is propaganda to try and convince us that that is how we are supposed to be. They appeal to our longing to live a long life and strive for a glimpse of immortality by telling us this is how we are supposed to be, and that if we are good little people we too can have this bliss.

Maybe I come from a long line of depressive pessimists but my grandpa just turned 93, and he's as ornery a SOB as you can get... My other grandpa finally died at 91 and he was the most abusive, biggest racist, mean, old bastard I'd ever met... bar none. And believe me I've met some real pricks.

Take my landlord for instance, or how about the senior prison guard who liked to make rookie women cry, or the murderer who once told a phone caller he wished he'd raped and killed the victim that got away so she'd shut up and stop marching for an endo to violence against women.

These are all really old bastards, if they aren't supposed to live as long, why are they still poisoning the world with their existence? I just don't see any evidence that what these studies profess is anywhere close to the reality around me.

Does this make any sense? am I getting across to anyone?

Schopenhaurer's studies in pessimism.
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/s/schopen ... pter1.html
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby PhebaAndThePilgrim » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 15:24:43

Good day from Pheba, from the farm:
I tend to look at this subject from a different viewpoint. I am a people watcher. I often wish I had a degree in sociology. But then I would be dumbed down and would not be a people watcher.
My theory for what it is worth: I believe that people who do not accept the doomer mindset really do know how bad things are. I believe the frenetic shopping and mad consumption are all symptoms of a deep underlying, gut wrenching fear. I believe that people already know that we are on a runaway train. A person would have to be totally brain dead not to subconsciously absorb the signs that are all around us.
I am much happier knowing what is going on. I would rather face a bleak future head on than go around living with some nameless nagging fear that I just could not put my finger on.
Concerning the other subject being discussed on this site. I often hope that I still have enough brain cells floating around to find a way to end it if I get in really bad shape.
I would much rather die than end up with somebody changing my diapers while I prattle on endlessly about events that happened decades ago.
My Mother died of cancer. She passed away in my home. I was her caregiver for 17 months. I plan on taking myself out rather than suffering in such a manner. Good people, bad people. Cancer cells are like corporations. They don't give a rats ass about anything or anybody. they both exist for one purpose: growth.
There was a made for TV miniseries called: "Angels in America". I really liked it. I am a huge Al Pacino fan. In the film Pacino plays a real jerk. He is a powerful attorney who is gay and ends up with AIDS. There is another sweet young man named Pryor. Pryor also ends up with AIDS. Good person, bad person. Pathology does not care.
Bored and snowed in; again.
Pheba.
PhebaAndThePilgrim
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri 29 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Show-Me State

Re: Non-doomers live longer - Research-based evidence

Postby Narz » Sun 23 Dec 2007, 17:20:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '"')Living longer"---what does that mean?

All the ailments, aches, and pains of old age. Slowly watching yourself lose all the functioning and abilities you hold dear.

Old age isn't something to aim for. Because by the time you get there, you'll find it isn't very worthwhile being there.

Take a walk down the hallway of a nursing home and you'll see what I mean.

Doesn't have to be that way.

Look at Jack LaLanne. Homeboy's 90 something years old and probably healthier in a number of ways than I am.

Image

(I don't think he's 90 there, just the first image I found on Google image)

The point is, almost anything that's going to help you live longer is also going to help you become healthier, both in the present AND the future.

There are plenty of 70+'s NOT in the nursing home and who never will be. Chances are most of them eat frugally, do some excersise, aren't full of hate & bitterness and most importantly feel useful & loved by those around them.
Last edited by Narz on Sun 23 Dec 2007, 17:24:48, edited 1 time in total.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron