Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Peak Oil Theory

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Graeme » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 06:13:57

The Energy Bulletin staff made the these comments about the following article:

One of the better articles criticizing peak oil theory, although I think most of its objections have been answered.

Interestingly, the article starts out by saying that the idea of peak oil is self-evident. Thus we we have passed into the last stage a truth reaching acceptance. According to a widely disseminated quote (sometimes attributed to Schopenhauer):
"All truth passes through three stages: First, it is ridiculed; Second, it is violently opposed; and Third, it is accepted as self-evident."


The Peak Oil Theory by Robert Mabro

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he statement that the production of crude oil, an exhaustible resource, will reach a peak will not be entirely a tautology if it also told us something about the production pattern over time; something that is not necessarily implied in the exhaustibility concept. The peak story tells us, indeed, that after rising over years, decades or centuries, production will enter a phase of decline. The peak could take different shapes however. It could appear as the apex of an acute angle, or stretch out over a long period in the form of a plateau, or emerge more than once in the shape of a saddle or as a chain of dunes.

One major reason for their propensity to bring forward the dreaded event seems to be an eschatological inclination. Consciously or sub-consciously they are inclined to predict the end of a world economy that was fuelled by cheap oil over several decades. They also want to catch the headlines. For these reasons they need to predict an early peak. To tell us, for example, that oil production will peak in 2030 and oil resources be fully exhausted by 2080 would have little impact. The prediction has to be about an imminent event.

Exhaustibility is not a problem if there is time available to develop substitutes, and for technological progress to proceed further and delay the peak outcome. There is no doubt that the adjustments to scarcer and scarcer (which means more and more expensive) oil will occur. The critical question, once again, is ‘when?’ Once again one should emphasise that time is of the essence. The gestation lags of R&D and energy investments are long, sometime very long indeed. And investors – be it private companies or public sector entities – are increasingly slow in their responses because the future is always perceived as uncertain.

The peak oil theory, as defined above, has a harmful impact because it focuses on the wrong problem and in doing so it shifts attention away from more vital issues.

There is no ‘physical’ problem in the long run. There are, however, investment problems on the transition path from the oil to the ‘other liquids’ era. The ride is likely to be bumpy. And what we need to worry about now, and seek solutions to, are the investment and technical progress issues. Governments of OECD countries and private energy companies are not yet addressing these problems, worrying instead about the imminence of peak oil (a falsely alarming issue) for the security of energy supplies (a grossly misunderstood concept) and climate change (the most important about which the most significant polluters are unwilling to tackle.)

Re-focusing the debate away from the peak oil paranoia and towards the need to invest in the production of liquid fuels at the right time will put us on the road to a solution.


energypublisher
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Nano » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 11:30:34

Re-focusing the debate away from the peak oil paranoia and towards the need to invest in the production of liquid fuels at the right time will put us on the road to a solution.

Well obviously.

The reason for my personal 'peak oil paranoia' is not the fact that peak oil will occur, but rather that it will remain impossible to predict with certainty when it will occur. Peak oil will be recognised only in hindsight. Therefore, it will be totally impossible to make the necessary investments for change in a timely manner.

In other words: we will have to adjust to the ramifications of Peak Oil during the very time when those ramifications are already upon us. And they might force us to enact solutions very different from the many options that we will have had pre-peak, due to the sharp decrease in surplus energy availability.

Post-peak government policy might very well involve increased international aggression and reduced civil liberties, instead of the support of expensive long-term sustainable development.

How is the state going to support long term investment when unemployment is at an all-time record high and rising? The voters will demand immediate support, creating a downward spiral into chaos and poverty, and eventually the rise of totalitarian neo-communist and/or -fascist regimes.

That is what scares me about peak oil.
User avatar
Nano
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Delft, Netherlands

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby PeakingAroundtheCorner » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 12:33:44

The key word in all of this is production. Peak Oil is a peak in production, the act of extracting oil from the ground. There's still plenty of oil. It is just not humanly possible to get to it. Geophysical contraints are placed on what we can get to and Hubbert's Peak takes over. All the investment in the world won't overcome Hubbert's Peak.

And they know it.
User avatar
PeakingAroundtheCorner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun 08 Apr 2007, 03:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Aaron » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 12:51:35

If peak oil is a theory, it's on the level of the theory of gravity.

No serious claims have been made disputing peak oil per se... only when it will occur is in dispute.

The USGS & others also predict a production peak... just decades later than ASPO et al.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 13:03:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'I')f peak oil is a theory, it's on the level of the theory of gravity.

No serious claims have been made disputing peak oil per se... only when it will occur is in dispute.


The likely effects are also in dispute.
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Aaron » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 14:39:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'I')f peak oil is a theory, it's on the level of the theory of gravity.

No serious claims have been made disputing peak oil per se... only when it will occur is in dispute.


The likely effects are also in dispute.


Conceded.

Although a dispute about "how bad is bad?", isn't much of a debate.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby steam_cannon » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 14:44:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')e-focusing the debate
= Spin
So he is suggesting is that industry accept peak oil as a fact, while spinning those nasty implications out of the discussion. But that's kind of like accepting climate change while keeping all those nasty droughts out of the discussion.

If my brain fell out of my head and I believed this person...
"peak oil (a falsely alarming issue)"
+ "the security of energy supplies (a grossly misunderstood concept)"
+ "climate change (the most important about which the most significant" "polluters are unwilling to tackle.)"
------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Be calm, all is well!!

Image

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')ill put us on the road to a solution.
Classic corporate happy ending. Yes, happy motoring this way! We just need to refocus!

I have to say, good find Graeme. It's amusing, but also it's insightful into how corporates will play down peak oil as it becomes undeniable.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby JohnDenver » Tue 27 Nov 2007, 22:57:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'I')f peak oil is a theory, it's on the level of the theory of gravity.

No serious claims have been made disputing peak oil per se... only when it will occur is in dispute.


The likely effects are also in dispute.


Conceded.

Although a dispute about "how bad is bad?", isn't much of a debate.


It's not going to be bad. Aside from some minor lifestyle adjustments, the world will smoothly shift to alternatives. And the economy will be stimulated, not depressed, due to the huge amount of retrofitting and construction work.
Peak Oil Debunked
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Poordogabone » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 03:22:52

"minor lifestyle adjustments"
Maybe not.
Horses Pushed as Transport options
User avatar
Poordogabone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Nano » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 09:05:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I')t's not going to be bad. Aside from some minor lifestyle adjustments, the world will smoothly shift to alternatives. And the economy will be stimulated, not depressed, due to the huge amount of retrofitting and construction work.


What you call a 'minor lifestyle adjustment' will appear as massive lay-offs to the workers servicing the 'current' lifestyle. My frivolous spending is someone else's bread and butter. If we all go back to spending on things we *need*, as opposed to spending on things we *like* then that's most of your average economic activity down the drain right there.

That's the whole problem of peak oil and reduced surplus energy in a nutshell. I don't understand your well-known complacence concerning this, although I'd like to.
User avatar
Nano
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun 16 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Delft, Netherlands
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby JohnDenver » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 10:47:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nano', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'I')t's not going to be bad. Aside from some minor lifestyle adjustments, the world will smoothly shift to alternatives. And the economy will be stimulated, not depressed, due to the huge amount of retrofitting and construction work.


What you call a 'minor lifestyle adjustment' will appear as massive lay-offs to the workers servicing the 'current' lifestyle. My frivolous spending is someone else's bread and butter. If we all go back to spending on things we *need*, as opposed to spending on things we *like* then that's most of your average economic activity down the drain right there.


One day, I saw one of these electric cars driving down the street near my house in Osaka:
Image
It was only about 1.2 meter tall, and I could have kicked it over with my foot. It actually made me laugh. But then it shot out quickly into the intersection. It was really fast and manuverable, and reminded me of a rat scurrying.

I also see people riding on electric bicycles/scooters all the time, 2 or 3 times a day. Maybe you have them where you are too.

What I'm saying is that, for the typical American, switching to vehicles like these would be a frightening lifestyle shift. But in reality, it's not that big of a deal. Electric vehicles are dorky, but they work quite well, and can be very useful and fun when you get past the mental block. Yes, they may not do everything, but they can still do a hell of a lot, and save you lots of money. And they're only going to get better.

So the firms in the conventional automobile business will have to adapt or die. But that's not a new thing. Old firms get challenged and overrun by more nimble start-ups. It's an old story. There will still be a thriving market for transport vehicles -- just vehicles of a different type. Vehicles that gradually evolve into smaller, lighter shapes, and more specialized niches, in order to run on expensive fuel or electricity.

The pessimists tend to think that the U.S. won't make this shift. But the U.S. doesn't have a choice. It's like the switch from analog to digital TV. After analog broadcasting stops, it's not like you have the choice to not switch. You have to, or you can't watch TV. Therefore, everyone will switch, and this will be very stimulative to the economy.

Similarly, when the "cheap oil broadcast" stops, and the "expensive oil broadcast" begins, people will buy new cars, retrofit their old ones, buy electric bicycles, etc. Not because they want to, but because they'll lose functionality if they don't. Therefore they will make the buy, and it will stimulate the economy.

It's going to be a huge bonanza for the next-generation car/EV/scooter industry.
Peak Oil Debunked
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby dukey » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 10:51:54

it's a good thing u can run tractors on batteries too
oh wait
never mind
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby VinceG » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 14:05:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'I')f peak oil is a theory, it's on the level of the theory of gravity.

No serious claims have been made disputing peak oil per se... only when it will occur is in dispute.


The likely effects are also in dispute.


Conceded.

Although a dispute about "how bad is bad?", isn't much of a debate.


The problem is that people like you have such pessimistic assumptions of what the possible consequenses of peak-oil might be, that there is no fair and balanced debate possible. How can you have a serious discussion with people about a highly relevant subject like peak-oil when they enter the debate with such nagative bias? Peak-oil as a theoretical concept can be discussed in an serious, objective, academic manner. The possible concequenses and outcomes of peakoil is just speculation and assumptions...
"In the U.S., fears are so exaggerated and out of control that anxiety is the number-one mental health problem in the country.", Barry Glassner
User avatar
VinceG
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Sys1 » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 14:59:37

VinceG,

What the point to argue about the pessimistic viewpoint/peak oil theory now? Sorry, but we are in very deep S*** and beeing optimistic about PO is like saying 10 minutes before the Titanic sank :
"Everything is fine! Look! The lights are still on!"

We are supposed to act as a giant to save what can be saved, "we" meaning mankind, but instead we debate on the internet about a "theory" (nevertheless as strong as life leads to death) while our brilliant politics speak growth on mass media.
User avatar
Sys1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Aaron » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:29:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow can you have a serious discussion with people about a highly relevant subject like peak-oil when they enter the debate with such nagative bias?


You write stuff... I respond... & so forth.

Debate!

If we already agreed with each other, that's just a discussion; not a debate.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's not going to be bad. Aside from some minor lifestyle adjustments, the world will smoothly shift to alternatives. And the economy will be stimulated, not depressed, due to the huge amount of retrofitting and construction work.


Well ok then... sure hope you're right.

But that's a pretty generous assessment of the future considering humanity's tendency to fight about stuff don't ya think?
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:36:21

How many of us are in the process of making those minor adjustments to our lifestyles?


Have you made them? What are they?
Ludi
 

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 15:39:04

I have to admit, many of the Peaker's act like those Bible thumping fanatics...................

The sky is falling!

The end is near!

You have been warned!
vision-master
 

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby JohnDenver » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 21:34:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'i')t's a good thing u can run tractors on batteries too
oh wait
never mind


How about extension cords for tractors? Or a pantograph:
Image

Batteries and motors have plenty of power. Here's a video of an electric car smoking a Ferrari and a Porsche in a drag race:
[video width=425 height=355]http://www.youtube.com/v/BqqtJpfZElQ[/video]
Clearly more than enough horsepower to plow the back 40. Of course, due to the range limitation, EV tractors won't be able to work farms larger than 150 miles. :?
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby venky » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 21:54:28

I think in order to answer if the transistion is going to be painless or not, we have to look at the economic effects of continued higher oil prices and a possible decline of oil. It is a complex analysis which few people here have the capability to undertake.

However a few basic points might be as follows. There are a large number of jobs in the US in particular directly tied to the automobile industry and related services. According to Monte Quest it is 1/6th of all jobs in the US; a figure I tend to question. But we might be looking at a scenario where millions of people will find their jobs vanishing.

Also, rising oil prices ripple through the economy causing cutbacks in budgets in all sectors and a lot of layoffs. The loss of purchasing power of so many people will at the very least cause a serious economic recession.

In order for a painless transistion to occur we have to show that the net addition of jobs and economic activity from the work in transistion to alternatives will offset the loss from the causes above. One must also consider whether the scenario of a serious recession would be the time where investors might consider alternative energy projects to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars; which is what would be required.

My gut feeling is that some countries in Europe might be able to achieve such a transistion seamlessly while the US might undergo a period of hurt.

I think most third world countries would suffer terribly as they will be priced out of the oil market and would lack the resources to transistion by themselves to an economy based on alternative sources of energy.
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The Peak Oil Theory

Unread postby venky » Wed 28 Nov 2007, 22:09:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'H')ow many of us are in the process of making those minor adjustments to our lifestyles?


Have you made them? What are they?


Its hard to make too many significant changes as an individual. After all we depend on the broader economy for our jobs; we live among people who have no large sense of these issues; so we do have a certain amount of pressure to conform. To acquire the skills to be independent in a rural area is a full time job in itself; and I doubt few who have tried that are truly independent from the 'system'.

The best most people can do (as I have done) and live within your means and save. And diversify your skills.
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron