Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Graeme » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 05:35:03

Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Farmers, oil barons, terrorists, Honda: All bastards

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he answer, according to Zubrin, is to introduce "flex-fuel vehicles" (FFVs) which can run on methanol, ethanol, gasoline or any mixture of the three. In such a car, you could fill up using existing stations - but as cheap methanol and perhaps ethanol became available, drivers would be able to use them easily. You could gaily top off a half-tank of petrol with Styrofoam-cup methanol or corn ethanol with no ill effects.

Flex-fuel cars have already been developed, according to Zubrin, by pioneering Ford engineer Roberta Nichols. They're great, apparently, and large-scale trials took place in California during the 1990s.

Over 14,000 methanol/gasoline FFVs demonstrated “seamless vehicle operation on methanol, gasoline, and all combination of these fuels"... FFV engines were as durable as standard gas engines ... there were incremental improvements in emissions fuel efficiency.
FFVs are also better for the environment than gas-powered cars... mitigating the immediately pressing problems of air pollution and toxic spills, both on land and on water. Unlike oil, gasoline, kerosene, and virtually all other petroleum fuels, alcohol fuels can mix with water. They dissolve and are readily consumed by common bacteria, which averts long-term environmental degradation.


theregister
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby halcyon » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 06:33:53

The guy is on crack, or just selling his book on a trendy topic.

One can find a longer excerpt of his book at :

http://www.thenewatlantis.com/archive/18/zubrin.htm

He has a point I agree on :

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Robert Zubrin', '
')"To be realistic as an energy strategy, a plan must be technically practicable and politically feasible."


But then he goes on to talk about wood alcohols.

Gimme a break!

I'm living in the country that is the one of the biggest relative wood alcohol producers in the world, with huge forestry industry and very big chunk (relatively) of liquid transport fuels coming for black liquor (i.e. wood processing alcohols).

Let me tell Mr. Zubrin some basic facts :

1) There is NO way any wood producing nation can scale up it's wood alcohol production to to meet with transport fuel demand alone (not to mention other uses). Besides, even in countries like where I live, the industry is pretty much dying, because wood has become too expensive. Even if it wasn't, we could not produce nearly enough alcohol, even if we cut down all the forests, after which we would have the kind of an ecological catastrophe of topsoil loss that would make the great dust bowl tragedy of the great plains look like a Sunday picnic.

2) Biofuels out of food sources? Where has he been living for the past 1.5 years? Under a rock? Has he not read any studies on: amount of CO2 released by food source biofuels, price hikes on edible crops, calculations of available land for food AND biofuel production. Political risks due to food vs fuel fight? Scaling of biofuels out of any biomass source currently in working technology level?

3) FFVs are proven technology. Hell they've had them for sale in Scandinavia for a decade and they are already running on different fuel mixes. Brazil is decades ahead of us in this regard. But FFV technology is NOT fuel. We need the fuel. See 1+2 above.

I dare Mr. Zubrin to come up with a bio-physical (ecological) calculation, that is not based on neo-classical price estimation economics (none of that "price floor on food based biofuel due to food crops" crap), for how to meet up even 50% of US total liquids demand out of wood alcohols.

- Where does the wood come from (at renewable levels!)?
- Where is it processed (factories, built when by who where)?
- Which transport mechanism moves the biomass and the fuel back & forth (please calculate truck fleet required for the millions of tons of wood mass)?
- What is the total well-to-wheel efficiency of wood alcohols with NO added co-production (i.e. pulp/paper process stuck to the side giving overall economic system efficiency boosts)
- How fast can US replace their auto-fleet (current replacement level is 2% pa MAX, and most people will not buy eco-cars come what)?
- How practical/political is a _legislative_ effort to mandate FFV cars in US, where oil subsidies are counted in several billions? In what way would any big US based IOC want to see this kind of legislation? How would it ever pass?

Now, I would like to believe in the world Mr Zubrin offers, but it seems he has smoked too many magic mushrooms or that he is just taking us all for a ride with a fairytale about wood alcohol, world saving gnomes and techno-fairies, in order to sell his latest children story book.

In the words of the pit floor trader:

"Show me the numbers!"

If he could even start with the list above and the list below:

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/w ... tions.html

and proceed through those 9 points with actual numbers, it would be a start.
User avatar
halcyon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby ohanian » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 07:38:44

Does it run on single malt whiskey?
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby eastbay » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 12:29:44

Good response halcyon.

I seriously doubt if harvesting all the trees in North America could provide enough alcohol to keep just the LA freeways moving... and only for a relatively short time.

Alternative fuels are simply a fuzzy dream designed to function as an opiate for the masses while serving only to temporarily keep the population calm as we quickly squander the planet's remaining oil.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Twilight » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 12:33:20

halcyon said it all, I think.

Another way of putting it is "do trees grow fast enough?"
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Jupidu » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 13:23:29

@halcyon

Yes your are right when you are saying that it isn't possible with the state of the actual agriculture to deliver all the fuel which is needed.
But Nature has still more possibilities we all can dream of!

1. Instead of building flex-fuel-cars it is better to build smaller cars with motors that run on only one fuel. It is much easier to design a motor for only one fuel and the motor is more efficient (less compromises).
2. You can get vegetable oil from a field plus (!) the usual yield of corn, wheat, etc. when you practice the method of intercropping ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercropping ) respectiveley mixed intercropping. A good mixture is e.g. false flax or gold-of-pleasure (Camelina sativa) in combination with grain (Wheat, rye, etc.) or even better together with legumes (peas, beans, etc.). A study in Germany showed that you can get up to 270 Liter of false-flax-oil per hectare (about 2,5 acres) by growing peas together with false-flax. So you get even more oil than you need for processing the culture till the harvest.
3. David Blume explaines how to produce efficiently and with competitive prices alcohol (e.g. in the following document about using food waste or agricultural waste):
"Selecting feedstocks" (for making Alcohol)
http://www.alcoholcanbeagas.net/book_me ... 29/384/429
So you need no pipeline to transport ethanol or other alcohols around the states.
You grow your fuel at your site!
No transport with oil spilling supertankers, no explosions in big refineries, no hazard through pipelines.
4. He also explaines that there are not only 434,164,946 acres of “cropland” in the US, but also 939,279,056 acres of “farmland, but it’s not as level and the soil not as deep.
Permaculture (Geoff Lawton and his miracle at the Dead Sea in Jordania; P.A. Yeomans and his Keyline-System ( http://www.yeomansplow.com.au/yeomans-k ... system.htm ) together with his method to convert quickly poor soil into fertile ground: http://www.soilandhealth.org/01aglibrar ... 25ch5.html) can do a lot for the soil and for the water-cycles in nature, especially in the actual situation where the Ogallala-Aquifer is running empty.
5. Oilseed crops are producing the more yield the more sun they get: peanut, sunflower, olives, etc.
There are other plants like jatropha bush which grows and yields oil containing nuts even in dry conditions.
6. In southern states with dry regions millet is also a possibility to grow food for animals.
7. Once hemp is reintroduced again all the problems with water supply are problems of the past: Hemp needs only a fraction of the water cotton needs to produce a certain amount of fibres. It enhances the soil, needs very few fertilizers and almost no pestizides or herbizides. So this plant would be a economical miracle.
Guess who prohibited the cultivation of hemp in the USA!

There are Bacteria, called Rhizobacteria, and among them is
a special type which can convert aeroeus nitrogen into nitrogen which can be absorbed by plants (for Legumes as well as for grain crops!).
Now guess which companies have a patent on Rhizobacteria?

It's ESSO CHEMICAL CANADA and Agrium Inc. (a small tiny fertilizer production company,formerly known as Cominco Fertilizers (Calgary, CA)). Funny, isn't it. A Big Oil company investing money in a quite useless technology.
You have to search for the following names:
Kloepper, Joseph (Georgetown, CA, US), Scher, Fran (Bramalea, CA, US)

These are only some impressions what else is possible by working together with Nature in a smart and wise manor.
Jupidu
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat 03 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby PeakingAroundtheCorner » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 13:46:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', '[')b]Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Farmers, oil barons, terrorists, Honda: All bastards

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he answer, according to Zubrin, is to introduce "flex-fuel vehicles" (FFVs) which can run on methanol, ethanol, gasoline or any mixture of the three. In such a car, you could fill up using existing stations - but as cheap methanol and perhaps ethanol became available, drivers would be able to use them easily. You could gaily top off a half-tank of petrol with Styrofoam-cup methanol or corn ethanol with no ill effects.

Flex-fuel cars have already been developed, according to Zubrin, by pioneering Ford engineer Roberta Nichols. They're great, apparently, and large-scale trials took place in California during the 1990s.

Over 14,000 methanol/gasoline FFVs demonstrated “seamless vehicle operation on methanol, gasoline, and all combination of these fuels"... FFV engines were as durable as standard gas engines ... there were incremental improvements in emissions fuel efficiency.
FFVs are also better for the environment than gas-powered cars... mitigating the immediately pressing problems of air pollution and toxic spills, both on land and on water. Unlike oil, gasoline, kerosene, and virtually all other petroleum fuels, alcohol fuels can mix with water. They dissolve and are readily consumed by common bacteria, which averts long-term environmental degradation.


theregister


That's the same guy that swore to God he could get us to Mars. Wonder how that's working out for him.
User avatar
PeakingAroundtheCorner
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sun 08 Apr 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 15:01:56

HHHmmm... Is he talking about a new generation of "flux capacitator?" lol
"Open the gates of hell!" ~Morgan Freeman's character in the movie, Olympus Has Fallen.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby efarmer » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 16:45:17

There simply isn't any viable personal motoring scheme that is possible without relatively inexpensive petroleum at the present or predicted scales of usage on the horizon. This creates a huge vacuum that sucks the Rasputin energy out of folks and brings them public with techno-hype that is so awful that it ain't even wrong. I would remind people that being desperate about having to change our lifestyles will continue to open us up to clutching at the most useless straws possible. Figure out some simple things that keep you fed, warm, plugged into life and bring you joy, and let the Flim Flam Man, Tinker Bell, and Rasputin rock on with a smaller audience.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby lorenzo » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 17:09:46

This is dumb.

The best solution is electric cars with carbon negative bioenergy.

And you know it.


Why would anyone want to drive a carbon neutral vehicle or one that emits CO2 (as Zubrin's), when you can drive one that takes emissons from the past out of the atmosphere?

I don't understand all this endless nonsense when the solution is so clear.

Zubrin is an idiot pimping old school flex-fuel technologies and fuels the Brazilians have been using for 3 decades. Why does this guy even get the word in a mediocre journal like the Register?
The Beginning is Near!
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby KevO » Sun 25 Nov 2007, 18:14:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ohanian', '[')size=200]Does it run on single malt whiskey?[/size]


can you?

.
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA
Top

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby h20 » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 02:19:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', 'T')here simply isn't any viable personal motoring scheme that is possible without relatively inexpensive petroleum at the present or predicted scales of usage on the horizon.


This straw man argument is becoming the standard anti-biofuel argument on this site. :roll:
Image
User avatar
h20
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue 27 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oceania
Top

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 04:34:40

I think the absolute best way to move a car would be a serial plugin hybrid, preferably diesel so it can run on SVO/WVO. Under this scenarios you have 3 ways to fuel the car, electricity for commuting, SVO/WVO to cover you if you run out of electric range, and petrodiesel if you need to go on a rare road trip. So if you had solar panels to charge the battery and a small garden to generate the vegetable oil, you'd probably be covered for all your driving needs without ever resorting to petrodiesel.

I really don't know the math but I'm thinking there might already be enough WVO in the US generated to fuel the above plugins. I mean, you might only need a tank or two of the stuff a year.

Unfortunately the Chevy Volt is going to use a gas generator, not diesel, which must be in order to simplify emissions.
mos6507
 

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby nocar » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 08:55:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') think the absolute best way to move a car would be...


The best way to move, is not to move a person in 700-2000 kg steel, plastic, rubber (= a car), but to move a person on 10-20 kg metal and rubber designed to amplify the motion power of human muscles (a bicydle) powered by biofuel (=food).

Mobility means people going to places they want to go to. It is good for people to be able to get around. Cars do not need to get around. Cars, not being sentient creatures, really have no needs at all.

nocar




nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Mesuge » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 09:34:39

Well, I'm all for public transport and bicycles for most of the commuting. The human power machine - bike is not that efficient in terms of the energy imputs necessary to get that food per km/mj..

However, two-three seater electric car could be also a 450kg aerodynamic thingy, consuming sub <4kWh on the wheels, which is sub <6kWh from the plug, depending on AC/DC technology, battery chemistry etc. This kind of power could be relatively easily harvested from renewables in most parts of the world.. Add V2G so you can offload some of the energy back to the grid in the peak demand and/or increase efficiency of the nightly winds which can't be easily utilized now..

This concept would work nicely in theory,
but not in our culture of 7mld. peoples and rising..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby efarmer » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 13:13:22

I am extremely pro bio-fuels. I hate the idea of viable bio-fuels and other alternative energy technologies falling on their own swords by immediately attempting to replace gasoline automobiles on the present scale of usage before they are ready. Instead I am convinced we should greatly expand our rail and light rail and then to satisfy the places where alternative technologies to petroleum engines are a must and where they can build legitimate inroads and flourish. I could be completely wrong, and I would like to be wrong on the readiness of viable alternatives to petroleum engines that are on par with scale and readiness.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby TheDude » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 14:09:38

Mesuge - there's a new article at TOD on The Post Peak Car. This is about retrofitting existing small cars as EVs, but little Italian 3 wheelers are mentioned in the commentary. Interesting factoid: these were called APE, which means "bee" in Italian. And the much better known Italian motor scooters of course is the VESPA - "wasp."

Worth looking at just to check out the very curvy spokesmodel, too.

Permaculture helped to fill stomachs in Cuba, who have gone through the PO crash and survived.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')ransportation - A System of Ride Sharing

Cubans also faced the problem of providing transportation on a reduced energy diet. Solutions came from ingenious Cubans, who often quote the phrase, "Necessity is the mother of invention." With little money or fuel, Cuba now moves masses of people during rush hour in Havana. In an inventive approach, virtually every form of vehicle, large and small, was used to build this mass transit system. Commuters ride in hand-made wheelbarrows, buses, other motorized transport and animal-powered vehicles.

One special Havana transit vehicle, nicknamed a "camel," is a very large metal semi-trailer, pulled by a standard semi-truck tractor, which holds 300 passengers. Bicycles and motorized two-passenger rickshaws are also prevalent in Havana, while horse drawn carts and large old panel trucks are used in the smaller towns.

Image

This unique Cuban transport vehicle, called a "camel", can carry 300 passengers. (Photo by John Morgan)

Government officials in yellow garb pull over nearly empty government vehicles and trucks on Havana's streets and fill them with people needing a ride. Chevys from the 1950s cruise along with four people in front and four more in back.

A donkey cart with a taxi license nailed to the frame also travels Cuba's streets. Many trucks were converted to passenger transport by welding steps to the back so riders could get on and off with ease.


The power of community: How Cuba survived peak oil

Those are the kind of solutions that will actually take place.

Great post, efarmer.

How about some links on this carbon negative bioenergy, Lorenzo? Some semi-rigorous analysis. Mostly you just bring us these dispatches from the land of Platonic ideals.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: Top US engineer in piss-off-everybody car fuel solution

Unread postby Mesuge » Mon 26 Nov 2007, 18:24:17

Yes those italian PO guys and their Fiat conversion has been posted on the net for almost a year now. However, there are couple of problems with their particular approach:

- platform (this oldtimer has -5stars for crashtest even in 50km/h)*
- using low production volume high end AC traction and lithium batteries (shelf life unknown most probably worse the quality lead or NiMH)

---

as posted before it's has not been a technical problem at least for past 20yrs or more to have similar capability in modern & safe car, even using lead, which can be massproduced and recycled with given infrustructure..

The best overview of all the diversity in electric conversions,
categories of vehicles, technologies:
http://www.austinev.org/evalbum/

--
* personaly I've nothing against recycling old cars for econversions, but in reality there are too many SUV tanks and idiot drivers these days, so there might be other platform alternatives from newer vehicles..
DOOMerotron: at all-time high [8.3] out of 10..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron