Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE International Energy Agency (IEA) Thread pt 1 (merged) A

Discuss research and forecasts regarding hydrocarbon depletion.

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby paimei01 » Thu 25 Oct 2007, 19:20:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Valdemar', 'A')re we debating geological peak, or peak oil here? It's an important, yet subtle difference. You can argue that, ideally, we can surpass 90 Mbpd in the future if we don't have any wars, people don't riot over prices right now and specialist skills and technology are still developed well. On the other hand, as we can see, there are a great many problems limiting our capacity to output currently and for the foreseeable future. ...
At the end of the day, if oil output isn't meeting demand, then something is up and arguing over whether it is a true or an artificial peak is like debating who gave faulty directions as the car hurtles towards the cliff.

Zen masters do not riot and do not start wars. The problem is us, the people, how we think and how we behave, everything else does not matter
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby dukey » Thu 25 Oct 2007, 20:14:33

I think it might be slightly too soon to say we've peaked
but it definitely seems like we have plateaued.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby venky » Thu 25 Oct 2007, 20:46:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ont you think they have to now? Wouldn't it be great if we could go back to the good old days of $25/barrel.

absolutely not; oil that was cheaper than it should have been is what got us into this problem in the first place. ... My experience tells me this will result in project delays and ultimately lower recovery rates and steeper decline rates in existing pools....hence peak sooner and likely at lower levels. The rising costs in the industry are also a concern as they slow development. Lack of available personnel also creates program stoppage and delays. Almost the perfect peak oil storm if you will.

I know. my post was tongue in cheek in response to concerned's post which was I think a joke as well, I hope. :P
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby aahala » Fri 26 Oct 2007, 11:40:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', 'T')here it is, in pretty colors. If ever the expression "read it and weep" applied to anything, this is it:

Image

IEA World Oil Supply chart

Third quarter 2006: 85.5 million barrels a day.

Third quarter 2007: 85.1 million barrels a day.

Any effing questions, cornucopians? Or are you going to blow some smoke about this not being statistically significant, and how we need more data points?


I was wondering why you thought the third quarter had special
significance? Just hooked on the third quarter, or was it the
very last thing you saw?

If you look at the first quarter, there was no change and if
you looked at the second quarter there was an increase.
So tell me again, why the third quarter is so important but
the others aren't.
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby Doly » Fri 26 Oct 2007, 12:36:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala', '
')I was wondering why you thought the third quarter had special
significance? Just hooked on the third quarter, or was it the
very last thing you saw?

If you look at the first quarter, there was no change and if
you looked at the second quarter there was an increase.
So tell me again, why the third quarter is so important but
the others aren't.


The third quarter isn't particularly important. What is relevant is that the fourth quarter would need to be 85.6, if we want the average for 2007 to be the same as the average for 2006.

Now, 85.6 is higher than it's ever been, which means it looks likely that the average for 2007 will be lower than the average for 2006. Which may indicate 2006 is the peak, specifically the third quarter of 2006.
What are you doing about peak oil?
I am doing this
(click on the www button) v
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby aahala » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 11:10:32

Dolly

I agree with your numbers and post. But a drop in production
data is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient one.

If you look simply at the numbers, oil production dropped a
lot more for 4 of 5 straight years in the 80s. We now know
this level was greatly exceeded thereafter.

Of course, lots of things are different from that period. But
that's often the case from one time period to another.

What is it that makes these figures more important than the
figures in the early 80s, regarding the conclusion oil production
has now peaked?
User avatar
aahala
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby Zardoz » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 11:23:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala', 'W')hat is it that makes these figures more important than the figures in the early 80s, regarding the conclusion oil production has now peaked?

The fact that so many of the world's major oil fields are now in permanent, irreversible production decline.

Do you believe that there is going to be an increase in total production, and that if production is actually declining at the moment, it's just an 80s-style dip?
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby Tyler_JC » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 13:50:35

I'm sorry, but that chart doesn't indicate a peak.

It indicates a plateau.

We are only .5% below the top production level of 2006. There's too much uncertainty in that data to call that a peak.

In order to have a peak, we need to see several years of production declines, IMO.

Dip below 84mb/day, then 83mb/day, and finally 82...81...80...

There's your peak.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby Cyrus » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 14:56:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('aahala', 'W')hat is it that makes these figures more important than the figures in the early 80s, regarding the conclusion oil production has now peaked?

The fact that so many of the world's major oil fields are now in permanent, irreversible production decline.

Do you believe that there is going to be an increase in total production, and that if production is actually declining at the moment, it's just an 80s-style dip?



Exactly. We are now at a point where we have never beeen. In the past declines in existing fields were replaced with new fields which were still being discovered. Now, we must offset the decline with low EROEI alternatives(such as Alberta oil sands). Trust me, the situation isn't good.
User avatar
Cyrus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 25 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby mel1962 » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 15:10:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')'m sorry, but that chart doesn't indicate a peak.

It indicates a plateau.

We are only .5% below the top production level of 2006. There's too much uncertainty in that data to call that a peak.

In order to have a peak, we need to see several years of production declines, IMO.

Dip below 84mb/day, then 83mb/day, and finally 82...81...80...

There's your peak.


I think if you drill down and look closer at the monthly data, it appears a peak has occurred in July '06 which would concur with not only the quarterly and maybe the annual. Only time will tell see, link to post with monthly data below.

Did Peak Oil happen in July 2006 ?

We should know for sure after data comes from IEA for August through November. If production cannot match the bench mark of 85,500,000 per day from July 2006 with $90 oil, than I think we can conclude that peak oil has arrived. IMHO! :shock:
User avatar
mel1962
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun 14 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Great Lakes, USA
Top

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby Starvid » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 17:22:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mel1962', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')'m sorry, but that chart doesn't indicate a peak.

It indicates a plateau.

We are only .5% below the top production level of 2006. There's too much uncertainty in that data to call that a peak.

In order to have a peak, we need to see several years of production declines, IMO.

Dip below 84mb/day, then 83mb/day, and finally 82...81...80...

There's your peak.


I think if you drill down and look closer at the monthly data, it appears a peak has occurred in July '06 which would concur with not only the quarterly and maybe the annual. Only time will tell see, link to post with monthly data below.

Did Peak Oil happen in July 2006 ?

We should know for sure after data comes from IEA for August through November. If production cannot match the bench mark of 85,500,000 per day from July 2006 with $90 oil, than I think we can conclude that peak oil has arrived. IMHO! :shock:

No we can't, because the industry cannot respond to $90 oil in a few months.

It is just recently the industry has chosen $40 as their investment price. That is, no fields with a production cost above $40 a barrel are being developed by the majors.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: IEA supply data confirms peak and production decline

Postby mel1962 » Sat 27 Oct 2007, 20:10:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mel1962', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'I')'m sorry, but that chart doesn't indicate a peak.

It indicates a plateau.

We are only .5% below the top production level of 2006. There's too much uncertainty in that data to call that a peak.

In order to have a peak, we need to see several years of production declines, IMO.

Dip below 84mb/day, then 83mb/day, and finally 82...81...80...

There's your peak.


I think if you drill down and look closer at the monthly data, it appears a peak has occurred in July '06 which would concur with not only the quarterly and maybe the annual. Only time will tell see, link to post with monthly data below.

Did Peak Oil happen in July 2006 ?

We should know for sure after data comes from IEA for August through November. If production cannot match the bench mark of 85,500,000 per day from July 2006 with $90 oil, than I think we can conclude that peak oil has arrived. IMHO! :shock:

No we can't, because the industry cannot respond to $90 oil in a few months.

It is just recently the industry has chosen $40 as their investment price. That is, no fields with a production cost above $40 a barrel are being developed by the majors.


What is your source? We have been above $40 for a long time, does not compute? [smilie=dontknow.gif]

This is not a problem of the market, but rather a problem of Geology IMHO! :roll:
User avatar
mel1962
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun 14 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Great Lakes, USA
Top

Previous

Return to Peak oil studies, reports & models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron