Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source? NOT

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 12 Sep 2007, 22:36:47

You can ignite and burn "Brut" brand Cologne for energy the same way, and you don't even need a microwave!!!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296593,00.html
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby jbeckton » Thu 13 Sep 2007, 08:06:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'A')nother news video and a little more information!

This is really interesting stuff!

WKYC - Saltwater Fuel?

So, isn't anyone going to keep on trashing this phenomenon?
I need some sucker to argue with.

I wish to fu*k one of these reporters would ask the obvious energy in/energy out question! What's wrong with them?


Most of the doomers just like to chime in to laugh everything off as fantasy. They do not care to really look into the science behind these claims. If it’s not currently saving the planet from every existing problem, then it must be a hoax in their minds.

Don’t argue with them about the science behind things because they usually realize that they don’t know what they are talking about so they wait for MQ to come along with regurgitated quotes and book references about overshoot.

Should be any time now.....
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Ming » Thu 13 Sep 2007, 11:26:10

I already stated what was required on this. It remains fully correct. No need to repeat the same points.

(Now all that needs to be done is to let time go by and this hoax will follow the footsteps of all the others, into deserved oblivion…)
User avatar
Ming
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby emailking » Thu 13 Sep 2007, 12:46:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jbeckton', '
')
Don’t argue with them about the science behind things because they usually realize that they don’t know what they are talking about so they wait for MQ to come along with regurgitated quotes and book references about overshoot.



Haha! Ain't that the truth! :-D

And remember when he used to hide behind "I'm a mod, don't criticize me or you get a 2 week ban."

lol
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Ming » Tue 25 Sep 2007, 05:37:54

So?

Do we have a cure for cancer?

Do we have unlimited energy?

Do we have more mainstream TVs following the research genius that will save us all?

Do they need some more time to deliver?
(Like several million years?)
User avatar
Ming
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Falconoffury » Tue 25 Sep 2007, 14:07:59

Ming, what exactly about this is a hoax? Is the flame we are seeing special effects, and radio waves in fact do not cause such a thing?

It's just a scientific discovery. Maybe it is useless, but it's something we didn't know before. Science is simply about understanding the world in which we live, regardless of whether it saves civilization, mankind, or the planet.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Ming » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 11:57:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'M')ing, what exactly about this is a hoax? Is the flame we are seeing special effects, and radio waves in fact do not cause such a thing?

It's just a scientific discovery. Maybe it is useless, but it's something we didn't know before. Science is simply about understanding the world in which we live, regardless of whether it saves civilization, mankind, or the planet.

Until it is proved and reproduced/validated by others, it is not a scientific discovery.

In fact, I don’t think there is any discovery involved, but I cant be sure at this stage, since there are no real scientific studies presented anywhere about that “discovery”.
(And that is the essence of science: It needs to be publicly presented in enough detail so that it can be validated by peers!)

The “inventor” (a TV presenter) also would not know if it is a scientific novelty or not, since he clearly has no formation (formal or otherwise) in any of the areas involved…

Anyway, it is a hoax even if there is a minor (at best) scientific discovery involved.
Even in that (extremely improbable) case, the fact remains that it is being presented as much more than a scientific curiosity (and so would always be a deliberate hoax):
The “inventor” created a company to cash on that “discovery” (or to milk the usual gullible investors); claims that his device is associated to a cure for cancer (lol); that it is able to drive a steam engine (the simple fact of thinking about that specific “demonstration” says it all); he also claimed that it is able to produce “over unit” energy (although that claim seems to have been retracted later – but no scientist would ever claim that amazing/all-altering fact without complete, indisputable, certainty), and so on…

This is one of the clearest pseudo-techno hoaxes ever…
User avatar
Ming
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 13:11:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ming', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'M')ing, what exactly about this is a hoax? Is the flame we are seeing special effects, and radio waves in fact do not cause such a thing?


Until it is proved and reproduced/validated by others, it is not a scientific discovery.

In fact, I don’t think there is any discovery involved, but I cant be sure at this stage, since there are no real scientific studies presented anywhere about that “discovery”.

(And that is the essence of science: It needs to be publicly presented in enough detail so that it can be validated by peers!) This is one of the clearest pseudo-techno hoaxes ever…


Renowned scientist lauds Kanzius' invention

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Times News', '
')By GEORGE MILLER george.miller@timesnews.com

A materials scientist is heated up over the effect of John Kanzius’ external radio-wave generator on salt water. "It is scientifically a staggeringly important discovery", said Rustum Roy, a leading authority on microwave applications on materials technology.

Roy was in Erie on Thursday to view experiments with the radio-wave generator at Industrial Sales and Manufacturing Inc., the Millcreek company that builds Kanzius' generator. In the experiments, a test tube of salt water creates a flame when bombarded by the generator.

"It will certainly shape a lot of science", said Roy, who founded the Materials Science Laboratory at Pennsylvania State University. "It will tell us a lot more about the structure of water than anything in 100 years. It's a big, big contribution to the science of water."

Roy, a Penn State professor emeritus, still teaches some classes there and oversees research. He has done studies on the structure of water. He is also a visiting professor of medicine at the University of Arizona and distinguished professor of materials at Arizona State University.


Readers of this thread are forced to choose between some idiot named "Ming" and Professor Rustum Roy, a trained scientific observer with advanced degrees in chemistry who has looked at Kanzius' set up and declared that it really is something remarkable , something that needs to be examined further.

Why should anyone place more credence in an unknown forum poster who claims that Kanzius' invention is not really interesting at all but only SEEMS interesting?

[align=center][flash width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/lRh4vwLJAiU[/flash][/align]

Again, for the hundredth time, Kanzius' invention cannot possibly be an energy source, despite TV and print news claims, yet he seems to have stumbled upon a new phenomenon in physics and chemistry here. This is why I posted the thread in the first place. Go look at the first post!

Since the time of that first post on this subject, the pair of competent eyeballs attached to Rustum Roy's trained, credentialed brain have looked it over for signs that it is merely a magician's trick and they have seen that it apparently is NOT a trick or blatant hoax.

So again, Ming:

Last edited by Carlhole on Wed 26 Sep 2007, 13:47:48, edited 1 time in total.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby What2DO » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 13:27:40

Do we have a cure for cancer?

This is what the great and almighty MING has asked.

Well ming the inventor sure hopes so seeing how he has cancer.

ming you are truly a piece of shit floating on top of the water in a toilet just waiting to be flushed away forever.
User avatar
What2DO
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed 19 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Palmdale,Ca

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby jbeckton » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 13:41:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '
')[*]And finally, you seem to be arguing the merits of un-curiosity versus curiosity! People who read posts on a site like PO.com have at least a modicum of scientific curiosity. Why should they listen to some unknown idiot who insists that they should strive to be ignorant rather than curious?[/list]


Amen!

Some people around here assume that if you take any interst in something new, that you completely subscribe to every claim every assiciated with it.

It's quite obvious that they are uncomfortable with looking behind the curtain. Even if i see something I don't buy, I like to look into it justify my intuition.

But that is not the case for everyone. Some just like to chime in and call everything that is not conventional a "hoax" w/o ever looking into the claim or even reading the article in question.

These are people who are done learning about the world around them because they know everything. The funny thing is that they usually don't know jack!
User avatar
jbeckton
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2082
Joined: Fri 05 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Falconoffury » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 14:01:04

Even if the Kanzius effect produces a net energy gain, I don't see how that violates the laws of thermodynamics. The Kanzius effect is a process, just like fire and nuclear fission are processes that allow us to harness energy. Before we understood fission, uranium and other nuclear metals were useless to us. When we figured out how to generate electricity with these metals, they suddenly became a fuel source.

Salt water would be no different a fuel source than fossil fuels or uranium in that they are all limited.

Nuclear fusion is already a theoretical fuel source so vast, we can hardly imagine. We already know how to fuse the atoms, we just don't have the containment technology. The theoretical energy available to us is vast. Even the emptiness of space has a theoretical energy level above 0.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Aaron » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 14:10:46

Interesting effect.

Might lead to something down the road... never know.

Be hard to imagine a less efficient method of storing energy than this though.

Maybe burning rocks for fuel would be worse?

Maybe not though...
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Wed 26 Sep 2007, 14:57:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'E')ven if the Kanzius effect produces a net energy gain, I don't see how that violates the laws of thermodynamics...


Well, it can't possibly be an energy source.

Energy has already been released in the reaction to H and O to form water in the first place. It takes a virtually equivalent amount of energy to split the water molecules apart again.

If somehow the radio waves were able to split the moldecules using less energy than that, then we would be able to obtain energy in both the binding together and the re-releasing of H and O atoms. That's impossible - unless you claim that this method is the first ever to tap into zero-point!

What's remarkable about Kanzius' invention is the robust flame itself coming off the saltwater. Such a thing has never before been observed. It's the kind of science one would normally expect to have first been discovered by some frazzled-headed Russian in the 1920's.

The video of it suggests low power (although we don't know what the radio wave frequencies or power actually is). If the radio wave energy is indeed low power, that would indicate that Kanzius has discovered a more efficinet means of splitting hydrogen off the water molecule. That's pretty significant.

I'm interested to learn what the actual power parameters of Kanzius set up are.

Aslo, people have compared this to placing water in the microwave. Well, microwavews are essentially sound waves of very high frequency. Kanzius' set up is not using microwaves; he is using high frequency radiowaves somewhere along the electro-magnetic spectrum.

A curious-minded person would be interested to discover just exactly what is happening on the molecular level, what role the salt is playing, etc.

Like I've kept saying, it's just a very, very curious thing.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby big_rc » Thu 27 Sep 2007, 03:47:08

Maybe this thing/process/invention is not splitting hydrogen and oxygen. What might be happening is that this process might be helping the sodium ions in the water combine into pure sodium. Then the sodium is undergoing its normal, highly exothermic reaction with water. Just a guess here but it doesn't have to be necessarily hydrogen and water. I hope this stuff if legit. Sounds pretty cool.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Ming » Thu 27 Sep 2007, 20:29:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('What2DO', 'D')o we have a cure for cancer?

This is what the great and almighty MING has asked.

Well ming the inventor sure hopes so seeing how he has cancer.

ming you are truly a piece of shit floating on top of the water in a toilet just waiting to be flushed away forever.

Ok, this is clearly not a moderated forum.
I could just ignore these “participants” that come here to write these pearls.
They are worth nothing and cant hurt anyone from their keyboards, so they are just mildly annoying, whatever they write.

But they are accompanied by LOTS of other extremely stupid (and totally uninformed) participants.
And that is tiring: It means serious participants must perforce ignore interesting subjects (like this obvious hoax) and just concentrate on a very limited subset of threads (like Dantespeak and Pup55 do).
I don’t feel like doing that.

Also, I believe that arguing on this kind of site is like being in the special peoples olympics - even if you win your still retarded...
And, anyway, I have better things to do with my time: So…

I will terminate with 2 answers:

Carhole:
You clearly are dumb!
I explained several times already that SCIENCE IS NOT ABOUT OPINIONS.
In this case the authority you want to rely on is a senile nutjob. BUT IF HE WAS A PHYSICS NOBEL WINNER, with several papers published in Science and Nature and such, and if he did come and say "I believe this is XXX", that still would prove nothing.
In science, everybody (even an Einstein or a Feynman!) needs to present the research so that it can be fully studied and validated by pears. Otherwise opinions are just that, not science.
In this case, there are clear impossibilities, and clear indications of an obvious fraud.
No amount of opinions can change that…
And this:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')slo, people have compared this to placing water in the microwave. Well, microwavews are essentially sound waves of very high frequency. Kanzius' set up is not using microwaves; he is using high frequency radiowaves somewhere along the electro-magnetic spectrum.

Is one of the funniest dumbest statements I ever read!
Kudos on that!

Last answer, to a participant that knows little but tries to present arguments, and to discuss things seriously:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ven if the Kanzius effect produces a net energy gain, I don't see how that violates the laws of thermodynamics. The Kanzius effect is a process, just like fire and nuclear fission are processes that allow us to harness energy.

That is wrong: Fire and nuclear fission are reactions that liberate energy stored in matter that is transformed in the process. To invert those processes (to make the matter involved revert to the previous state) you would have to spend MORE energy then you had liberated in the fire on fission processes.

Water is a combination of hydrogen and oxygen that is in a less energetic form than the separated constituents.
You can separate those constituents (spending energy) and you can recombine them into water (liberating energy again). Thermodynamic laws imply that there are always losses in those processes.
So, not only it is impossible to get over unit energy by spending energy to separate the constituents of water and then recombine them, BUT YOU CAN’T EVEN DO IT WITHOUT A NET ENERGY INPUT.

End of this last free lesson, bye.
User avatar
Ming
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby untothislast » Fri 28 Sep 2007, 08:06:47

Regardless of whatever sources of energy scientific research may come up with, as long as they're in harness to the same growth/consumption obsessed economic worldview - it's only going to bring about our downfall faster. We're running low on raw materials across the board. There's no point having endless power, unless you've got the resources to make things with.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 28 Sep 2007, 10:27:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ming', 'T')hermodynamic laws imply that there are always losses in those processes. So, not only it is impossible to get over unit energy by spending energy to separate the constituents of water and then recombine them, BUT YOU CAN’T EVEN DO IT WITHOUT A NET ENERGY INPUT.

End of this last free lesson, bye.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', 'I')n this thread, I have posted over and over and over and over again for morons like you, that Kanzius's invention cannot possibly be an energy source. Yet the thread is continually attacked for being a claim that it IS an energy source.

Wouldn't you like it if it were a claim to be an energy source! Then you would be able show everyone how smart and energy literate you are! But sorry! Kanzius invention can't possibly be an energy source. It IS, however, an interesting phenomenon that no one seems to have hit on before. It's been vetted by the founder of the Materials Sciences Lab at Penn State University (see link).

So, now, according to the historical dialogue on my thread, you're supposed say, "But it can't possibly be an energy source fool!"

And then, I come back and say, "Kanzius invention cannot possibly be an energy source but it is interesting because it apparently is an entirely new phenomenon...".

And then you come back and say, "Get this trash off of PO.com! I'm fed up with these energy hoaxes!".

And then I come back and say, "I'm not saying it's an energy source. I'm saying it's quite curious..."

And then you come and say, "Godammit. It's not an energy source".

Ok, ready to play? I'll go first: "John Kanzius seems to have stumbled on an entirely new phenomenon. The news organization are calling it an energy source and a potential cure for cancer to boot".

Now it's your turn.

...

So, tell me, why shouldn't an apparently new phenomenon in physics be interesting? That's what this thread was supposed to be about.

Go back and look at the very first post, for Christ's sake!
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 20 Oct 2007, 01:41:04

Salt Water Can "Burn," Scientist Confirms

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('National Geographic News', 'S')alt water can indeed burn when exposed to a certain kind of radio wave, a university chemist has confirmed.

Rustum Roy of Pennsylvania State University verified earlier this month that the radio waves break the water into its components, allowing the resulting freed hydrogen and oxygen to catch fire.

Independent scientists said the phenomenon is credible as explained, though practical applications of the technology remain uncertain and it's unlikely to be a source of cheap energy.

"It seems like, to me, an interesting set of processes that's been uncovered," said George Sverdrup, a technology manager at the Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado.

"That doesn't say much for its applicability or any possibility for the marketplace, though, at this point."


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')REL's Sverdrup said scientists will need to evaluate the energy costs of the process. Energy is required to bind salt water's chemical bonds and water molecules, he noted.

"If hydrogen and oxygen are liberated, sufficient energy to break those chemical bonds has to be put into that system," he explained.

That energy "presumably" comes from the radio frequency generator, he added.

Daniel Kammen directs the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory at the University of California at Berkeley. While he remains skeptical about the phenomenon as an energy source, he said, "it sure would be neat if true."


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')For now, the most immediate potential technology application is desalination—the process of removing salt from water—because the water formed after combustion is free of salt and other contaminants.

"It's really a miraculous process: water-breakup-water," Roy said.

Further Research

Brent Haddad directs the Center for Integrated Water Research at the University of California, Santa Cruz.

He commented in an email that the "research is located in the right place: at the nexus of energy production and water treatment. But it is too early to tell what the practical applications will be."

Roy met Monday with officials from the U.S. departments of defense and energy to discuss the discovery and seek research funding.

He said entrepreneurs from all over the world are also contacting him via email.

"They are all saying, Holy cow, everything has changed."


[align=center]***EMPHASIS MINE!***[/align]

And so, as another batch of unworthy debate opponents is flushed down the Carlhole, I command you all to pay close attention to whatever I say on these forums for I am now a PO.COM EXPERT!!

(as you can see by the little dash of elan o'er my avatar).
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 26 Oct 2007, 01:21:21

"If we could just burn salt water, we'd never run out of fuel"

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MotorTrend', '.')..Kanzius's lab demonstration offered little to convince me otherwise. Sure, a test tube of pure water sat there in his radio-wave gizmo with nothing happening, then a quarter teaspoon of Morton's salt was added and, presto, the radio waves prompted it to catch fire. The gauge on the radio-wave generator read 200 watts, but there was no telling how much heat was coming off the flame or how much power was coming out of the wall, so I had no way of knowing whether this was an energy-losing parlor trick or a breakthrough.

Then I contacted Dr. Rustum Roy, an authority on the structure of liquid water at Penn State University, which houses one of the foremost microwave research labs. He hadn't met Kanzius, but his enthusiasm for the concept was palpable. No hard research has been conducted as yet -- it's only been a few months since the water first caught fire -- but Dr. Roy speculates that because the 13.56-MHz radio frequency is a harmonic of the natural frequency of sodium ions, the waves are causing these positive ions to vibrate intensely. Van der Waal's effects attract the oxygen end of water molecules to the positive sodium ions, and the vibration shakes the oxygen molecules hard enough to break the hydrogen bonds, freeing the hydrogen gas, which then ignites and burns. If true, the radio waves may be giving us electrolysis at a deep energy discount, allowing the flame to produce a net energy gain without breaking any thermodynamic laws...
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: John Kanzius' Salt Water-Radio Wave Energy Source?

Unread postby Carlhole » Sat 10 Nov 2007, 07:59:48

Kanzius' Radio-Wave Generator successfully kills cancer cells - American Cancer Society

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoErie', 'A')n article describing the treatment using Kanzius' generator was first published late Tuesday in the online version of the Cancer Society's journal, Cancer.

The evidence, published as a collaborative article from 11 researchers, indicates that Kanzius' radio-wave treatment completely killed liver tumor cells in test rabbits with no side effects.

"We must be careful with terminology; in liver tumor models, we were successful," said Dr. Steven A. Curley, of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. "It means we're getting pushed farther ahead as rapidly as possible."

Curley said tumors in rabbits that were treated with only radio waves remained alive, while those injected with only nanoparticles also had no change in condition. Treatment using both radio waves and nanoparticles was successful...


This is the application that Kanzius had intended for his radio-wave device.

Kanzius acccidentally discovered that saltwater would release hydrogen and burn when in the field of radio waves. This was an entirely new phenomenon in physics to my knowledge. And it created a buzz amongst scientists, energy entrepreneurs and other interested people.

It seems that this method of releasing hydrogen from it's bond with oxygen is a whole lot more efficient than electrolysis - which is very significant, I think.

But it only seems to have earned contempt for not being an energy source here at PO.com.
Carlhole
 
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron