Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Modern Paradox

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The Modern Paradox

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Sat 06 Oct 2007, 02:49:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eastbay', '
')
Doomer Level approaching 10



I have the feeling you get when a roller coaster comes of the crest of its upward slope and you are anticipating the downward plunge except I don't have a seatbelt, the metal restraints have been removed, there are 6 billion people in the cars behind me and the carnies running the machine are passing around crack pipes and bottles of gin.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: The Modern Paradox

Unread postby eastbay » Sat 06 Oct 2007, 21:41:30

I too believe the time of Maitreya is getting close. I have all of my bets for a dignified survival and renaissance of humanity in buddhism, science, ecology and some philosophies.

I agree with you on all of that zensui, except for the part about science. Hopefully the application of science will be washed away forever, and pursued only as a complex academic study.
Got Dharma?

Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Re: The Modern Paradox

Unread postby sciencegirl » Sun 07 Oct 2007, 11:19:02

We are so stupid as a species sometimes. Houses because they are made of wood will not last more then 200 years at best. If we built homes from stone and concrete and limited the population it would have been so much better. The home would last thousands of years and have very good buffer against heat and cold.

With dwindling resources I would hope all the governments of the world get together and have a unified plan to control population and change how we do things. Since we are all greedy and self centered this will not happen, more likely we will horde our resources and start launching nukes to get what we want. So either way, the population will drop.

My opinion is that we will not go back to the stone age. Our books in the library's across the world will last for thousands of years. We will still have technology, solar, wind, and with research fusion. It is just that in the future we will start with a lower population and the energy we get from renewable resources only be available to a lower population.

Fusion power is promising but not available at present. Also from what I read the government is stretching a ribbon from earth to space as a way to transport stuff to space easier and cheaper. This may sound like science fiction but would it not be possible to send thousands of reflective mirrors in space to redirect the sunlight to a single point on earth and use that as a massive energy source. That is one idea I have, but don't flame me for it as I really have not given that one much thought yet. :)

One article on ribbon to space

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20021005/bob9.asp

Mirrors in space (an article)

http://peakoildebunked.blogspot.com/200 ... rrors.html

also: Space Elevator 1000 foot climb test

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjcaQT_ssE4

Also here is another good way to generate electricity (Humans are such clever beings)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-EvV90MeDY
We are the Borg. Resistance is futile. Your culture will adapt to service ours. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own.
User avatar
sciencegirl
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon 17 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: The Modern Paradox

Unread postby TheDude » Sun 07 Oct 2007, 16:18:36

Space elevator construction estimates are as "low" as 15 billion USD. Drop in the frickin' bucket, right? Just move an asteroid into LEO, and build 50 miles of nanotube cable. Voila! So now we're in orbit at 10$/lb, now what?

We'll put that one on hold for more mundane concerns like mass transit. Read some of the solar thermal topics in the Energy Tech forum, I think the smaller scale projects like Asura's or SPS (Stirling Power Systems) are more sensible than towers, which of their nature are massive endeavors, with long construction times. It's why I'm also beginning to agree that massive solar/wind will likely sprint ahead of nuclear buildups, even though you can't beat a splitting atom for EROEI.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron