Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby clv101 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 14:10:01

In an attempt to engage with the electorate, last year the UK Government launched an e-petitions service on their website. One petition focused on peak oil, it read:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to acknowledge that global oil and gas supplies are peaking and will soon decline; a situation requiring immediate action.


Today the Government has responded.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Government fully recognises that there is uncertainty around the issue of future global oil and gas production. However, on the balance of the available analysis and evidence, the Government's assessment is that the world's oil and gas resources are sufficient to sustain economic growth for the foreseeable future.

As the International Energy Agency (IEA) notes in its 2005 publication, Resources to Reserves - Oil and Gas Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future, the key problem is not the limit of geological oil resources: "The hydrocarbon resources around the world are sufficiently abundant to sustain likely growth in the global energy system for the foreseeable future". Rather, the challenge lies in bringing these resources to market in a way that ensures sustainable, timely, reliable, and affordable supplies of energy.

In this context, the 2007 Energy White Paper (new window) noted (paragraph 1.18 ) a number of risks to oil and gas security of supply and prices, including factors that could defer or restrict investment in energy production and hence lead to slower-than-expected growth in production. However, the current high oil prices are already providing incentives for strong investment in alternative sources of transport fuels, such as non-conventional oil and biofuels, and driving energy efficiency improvements in the way the world consumes oil, e.g. in transport vehicles. Governments are also taking action - internationally and domestically - in support of this.

For example, as set out in the Energy White Paper, the Government is putting in place policies that will help ease the UK economy away from power supplied primarily through fossil fuels as well as bringing about reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. Our strategy is to work to liberalise international markets, create the right environment to attract investment in exploration and infrastructure and, through measures to improve energy efficiency, and our ongoing commitment to renewable and other low-carbon technologies, help reduce our dependence on fossil fuels .

The Government has also launched the Low Carbon Transport Innovation Strategy (new window) setting out a wide range of actions Government is taking to encourage innovation and technology development in lower carbon transport technologies.


On The Oil Drum here.
"Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen." The Emperor (Return of the Jedi)
The Oil Drum: Europe
User avatar
clv101
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed 02 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 14:13:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')owever, on the balance of the available analysis and evidence, the Government's assessment is that the world's oil and gas resources are sufficient to sustain economic growth for the foreseeable future.



That's quite a statement.


Maybe they foresee the future only in terms of a few years... 8O
Ludi
 

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Twilight » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 14:16:02

Shit, it's not the rocks after all. It's just a question of investment and making sure our policies are understood. Anyone else still think these clowns are peak oil aware?
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby malcomatic_51 » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 14:37:56

clv101, I doubt that any government is going to explicitly acknowledge that we are at the peak. Governments just don't do that, especially if they have a banking industry that would disappear in a financial panic. They are saying they know we have to move away from fossil fuels. It's all "Sir Humphrey" language:

"No HM government does not believe PO is happening now, nor is it expected in the foreseeable future; yes we are going to promote efficiency and move the economy away from fossil fuels (at least provided we don't upset any drivers doing it)."

In practice they won't do very much that is actually very useful, but they will do things that are visible and "feelgood" without inconveniencing anyone very much. A bit like the way they deal with road "safety" (ie, they serve the heavy lorries and the boorish drivers who are the cause of most danger, and get tough on pedestrians and cyclists instead).

After seeing Northern Rock, I am pretty sure that they will do nothing until it is too late to do anything very much (it may already be that late).
User avatar
malcomatic_51
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby CarnbY » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 15:43:04

It's pretty horrifying really, they're just gonna run this bitch right into the ground!
User avatar
CarnbY
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 106
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Norway

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Ayame » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 16:37:11

Hahaha what a whitewash!

What faith they have in technology and the market.
Ayame
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu 29 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby americandream » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 17:05:18

In all honesty what can the government do...can you see the bedlam there would be were any government to ration the confectionary...look at Burma and the Monks! If resource deprivation can get buddhists into a lather, what hope does your average drone have.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby KrellEnergySource » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 19:25:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')n all honesty what can the government do...


They could represent the people and speak honestly.
User avatar
KrellEnergySource
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon 31 Oct 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby americandream » Wed 03 Oct 2007, 19:43:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KrellEnergySource', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'I')n all honesty what can the government do...


They could represent the people and speak honestly.


Yes....but can the people handle honesty...do they want to hear the honest truth...viz that the good old days of ample consumption and leisure are over...can your family handle that stark message...go tell them the truth! And see what the responses are likely to be. Or are you afraid to for fear of losing what little you have!
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby SILENTTODD » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 02:24:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clv101', 'A')s the International Energy Agency (IEA) notes in its 2005 publication, Resources to Reserves - Oil and Gas Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future, the key problem is not the limit of geological oil resources:


Quite frankly, after reading this sentence I didn’t need to read any more (see my Carl Sagan quote below).

I can see my English speaking brethren in Britain (there are fewer and fewer of us here in California) are just as screwed as Americans are. I hope the “experts” who say Britain will not freeze because of global warming when the Gulf Stream stops functioning are right.

If not, please migrate to America so I can still speak to someone in my first tongue.
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA
Top

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 05:54:33

The hydrocarbon resources around the world are sufficiently abundant to sustain likely growth in the global energy system for the foreseeable future". Rather, the challenge lies in bringing these resources to market in a way that ensures sustainable, timely, reliable, and affordable supplies of energy.


This is the telling part, they sold ours off (read: wasted it) now they want others to do the same to save their bacon.

Typical 'Globalization' response from a bunch of morons.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby whereagles » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 06:50:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'S')hit, it's not the rocks after all. It's just a question of investment and making sure our policies are understood. Anyone else still think these clowns are peak oil aware?


They are aware. But put yourself in their shoes. Would you say the petitioners are right and that we should take immediate measures? Can you imagine what would happen? Chaos everywhere, to say the least.

People have to be accustumed to the idea of change slowly, especially when it means lesser quality of life.

Two things can happen: either 1. a slow transition in mentalities is possible or 2. events will precipitate a fast transition whose consequences are unforeseeable.

A government must do its best to prevent 2. from happening, but acknowledging peak right now might just be what it takes to provoke it.
User avatar
whereagles
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 586
Joined: Wed 17 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portugal
Top

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby sjn » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 08:43:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whereagles', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'S')hit, it's not the rocks after all. It's just a question of investment and making sure our policies are understood. Anyone else still think these clowns are peak oil aware?


They are aware. But put yourself in their shoes. Would you say the petitioners are right and that we should take immediate measures? Can you imagine what would happen? Chaos everywhere, to say the least.

People have to be accustumed to the idea of change slowly, especially when it means lesser quality of life.

Two things can happen: either 1. a slow transition in mentalities is possible or 2. events will precipitate a fast transition whose consequences are unforeseeable.

A government must do its best to prevent 2. from happening, but acknowledging peak right now might just be what it takes to provoke it.


Actually, I think they are "true believers" in their econo-political idealogy. I'm not saying there aren't individuals in government who know the score, but like us, they are marginalized or feel impelled to remain silent on the issue. It really is a very strong taboo to point out the lack of clothes adorning the emperor.
User avatar
sjn
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1332
Joined: Wed 09 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK
Top

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 09:33:47

The US congress has a peak oil caucus. You'd figure they'd go to them for some guidance, rather than following the IEA around blindly. Don't know how much further you'll get without empty pumps.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Twilight » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 13:28:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sjn', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whereagles', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'S')hit, it's not the rocks after all. It's just a question of investment and making sure our policies are understood. Anyone else still think these clowns are peak oil aware?


They are aware. But put yourself in their shoes. Would you say the petitioners are right and that we should take immediate measures? Can you imagine what would happen? Chaos everywhere, to say the least.

People have to be accustumed to the idea of change slowly, especially when it means lesser quality of life.

Two things can happen: either 1. a slow transition in mentalities is possible or 2. events will precipitate a fast transition whose consequences are unforeseeable.

A government must do its best to prevent 2. from happening, but acknowledging peak right now might just be what it takes to provoke it.


Actually, I think they are "true believers" in their econo-political idealogy. I'm not saying there aren't individuals in government who know the score, but like us, they are marginalized or feel impelled to remain silent on the issue. It really is a very strong taboo to point out the lack of clothes adorning the emperor.

I agree with the above. They really do believe in the market. They are not self-censoring, they genuinely believe. OK? Mention it to an elected representative, and their confusion and surprise is for real. They don't spend most of their day dealing with macro problems. They spend hours, as do office workers across the country, micromanaging problems that do not require much attention.

The aware people have no public recognition. You will find them at the periphery of government, on advisory committees and in professional organisations. They can ask all the questions they like, they can write all the reports they want, hold consultations to their hearts' content, ultimately if they don't tone it down, a question mark is raised over their reliability. "Is he sound?" It does not pay to be alarmist, though at this point a wake-up call is required.

So the urgency of the situation never really gets through. And it will not, until the shit hits the fan somewhere so bad that those with the power to make decisions want a briefing. Who, by the way, were probably not in their current office only a couple of years previously. That's the other problem. In government, portfolios change too quickly for anyone to acquire a meaningful depth of knowledge and learn the results of their input. The officials who make it onto TV and radio are simply highly skilled at bluffing about the extent of their knowledge.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby like_the_dinosaurs » Thu 04 Oct 2007, 16:52:29

I suppose it's to be expected. How long has it taken them to announce publicly that global warming is real and requires action.

Just the announcement not the action mind you.

PO will most likely follow the same path, except this time the time-frame is 5 years not 50.

Really sad to see.
User avatar
like_the_dinosaurs
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 23 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Australia

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby mididoctors » Tue 16 Oct 2007, 15:28:33

gordon brown's response back in his chancellor days was "I'm on the phone to OPEC"

unfortunately twilight's take is pretty much on the mark.

Boris
London
User avatar
mididoctors
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 578
Joined: Mon 30 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: London

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby dukey » Tue 16 Oct 2007, 20:51:04

government response is WAR

mass death and killing to get the black stuff ;p
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby energyZ » Tue 30 Oct 2007, 08:27:14

Should the UK consider a new generation of reactors as alternative energy sources?
User avatar
energyZ
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 30 Oct 2007, 03:00:00

Re: UK Government Response to Peak Oil Petition

Unread postby Sideous » Wed 07 Nov 2007, 10:11:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('energyZ', 'S')hould the UK consider a new generation of reactors as alternative energy sources?


Absolutely. But their construction is likley to be hampered by shortages of oil and natural gas needed to manufacture and transport the tens of thousands of tonnes of steel and concrete required. Rising costs of energy inputs and programme delays are likely to push up the capital costs of the plants. Unless the construction of plants is fast tracked (which means giving two fingers to the NII regulators) the reactors will come on line too late to help mitigate the first decace of crisis.

One solution might be to reverse the decision to decommission the existing magnox plants and extend the life of the UKs AGRs, even if it means refilling the cores with fresh graphite. With great effort, many of the closed plants could be brought online again. Difficult though this would be, it could be done more rapidly than attempting to build new plants. The electricity they produce will be expensive, but it is better to have expensive electricity than none at all.

One key problem: reactors produce electricity, not petroleum. Unless the government is able to electrify the roads and crank up production of electric vehicles at break-neck speed, they won't help much with our transportation problems.
User avatar
Sideous
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue 22 May 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron