by Denny » Thu 27 Sep 2007, 17:32:11
[quote="Bytesmiths
So you want the US Homeland Security Agency in charge of Canada's borders? Might as well just give up and plunk a red maple leaf down next to the 50 blue stars on the US flag.
I don't really like the idea of being under their "thumb" as it were, but if we could come up with a common set of rules and cusotms officer certification, woudl it not be more efficient to just focus on the external, foreign risks,a nd avoid worrhying about the US-Canada border. I'd bet we spend a lot of money, and so does the U.S. just on that imaginary line separating Canda and the U.S. What real value added is that?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') really think our way of life is so similar, even more similar than say, Spain and France...
It's not so much "way of life" as it is attitude and world view that separates Canadians from Merkuns. I agree that Toronto is more like Chicago than a rural Saskatchewan community is like a rural Oklahoma community. Any place with a Mall*Wart is more like any other place with a Mall*Wart than it is like a place with local businesses.
But back to the topic: the thing I object to is
not common border security -- heck, US Homeland Security is already operating on Canadian soil at the ferry terminals in BC -- it's the implicit movement away from local control to corporate control. The
SPP/NAU comes with "regulatory harmonization," which I'm certain means a reduction in environmental and social protection in most cases.
For example, our wee island has a Saturday market that is fairly well known in these parts. It can be lucrative to the vendors, who must have lived on the island for at least six months, and the art and food sold must be locally produced. Under "big business" agreements, like SPP and
TILMA, such a thing will not exist, nor will attempts to stop big-box stores succeed. An artist from Alberta could petition the TILMA panel, and BC could be fined $5,000,000 for allowing local rules that discriminate against non-local participants. Salt Spring Mall*Wart -- here we come!
I am not in favor either of the corporate slant of the American government, but you know, I think that a lot of American are not so enchanged with it anymore, seeing what a sellout Bush has been. I'd bet you the next election, you will see many more Americans voting agaisnt that kind of sweetheart Republican corporate shackup.
With regard to Peak Oil, I think most of us agree that re-localization is A Good Thing, and that the future will be more local than today. Doesn't it seem a step in the wrong direction to de-localize by creating a new super-nation? I suspect that in 100 years or so, large nations will have collapsed into regional states that have common interests, unlike today, where the interests of a few people in places like Bentonville, Arkansas drive most national decisions.[/quote]