by Grifter » Fri 14 Sep 2007, 05:10:54
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', '
')You miss the point behind depletion. Our problem isn't that we are innovative, its that we're using our innovation to prop up a system premised on greed. A good analogy would be using innovation to feed a glutton from limited supplies in a food larder. At some stage, there's only so much you can squeeze out of this planet and no, I do not believe that we are anywhere near the pont where we can take to the stars to continue sustaining the capitalist system.
The system has to go if we are to have a chance of evolving to a species with incredible ability...we need to replace the cult of individualism with the creed of community. Nature abhors individualism...it's something of an abberation...yes it does happen but so do physiological diseases.
I agree with you, the system has to go, I don't think we will willingly let it go, it will not be our choice. It's still interesting.
Di-positronium, as the article says, has been thought to exist since 1946, but we haven't seen it. Now we have created it and therefore know for certain that it exists. That was how I read it anyway. So if the terminology is wrong to you lys3rg0, it is merely your interpretation of English rather than the writers interpretation of science. I believe the same can be said for the higs boson (sp?) I think, which was observed for the first time a couple of years ago. Previously thought to exist, but now there is actual evidence.
I can't wait for us super innovative species to create the first gamma-ray annihilation laser.
The joy