Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Our dilemma

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Our dilemma

Unread postby americandream » Thu 06 Sep 2007, 17:41:34

Lets get to the core issue here. Sustainable civilisation. Our choices? We hear the term sustainability bandied about. What does it mean? What choices do we face? Let's keep it simple...

1 Sustainable global capitalism....No matter what we do within the capitalist system, it's very logic is based on the intensive use of resources for the garnering of profit. To that extent any talk of sustainability has to take account of this fact and its ramifications in terms of whether controls can adequately be put in place to rein in capitalism to the degree that it is sustainable without overwhelming its fundamental dynamic of capital acquisition.

2 Variations of nationalism...We may on the other hand choose a reversion to variants of nationalism....itself essentially a variant of capitalism without globalism but one that fundamentally multiplied by as many of the nationalisms that subsequently abound, will in effect by largely inconsequential on the resource profile of its economies as that of global captalism.

3....Pure marxism. In other words, the complete elimination of private ownership, the utilisation as a result of community initiatives and the effect thereof of imposing a limitation on the output of that system of its usage of resources.

What would the resource profile of the last look like in comparison with the former two? Forget Maoism, Stalinism or all the other ism's that have proliferated as a result of attempts to interpret the writings of Marx. The fundamental structure of the ideal marxist economy is embodied in the writings of the great man, we do not have far to go.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby Concerned » Thu 06 Sep 2007, 21:55:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'L')ets get to the core issue here. Sustainable civilisation. Our choices? We hear the term sustainability bandied about. What does it mean? What choices do we face? Let's keep it simple...


I'm more in favor of Economic Democracy than any of the above choices.

With a move towards a steady state type economy and voluntary incentive based population reduction programs. E.g. Instead of two couples two children each suggest incentives for one couple one child or more than one couple (community) to look after less children than total couples.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby americandream » Fri 07 Sep 2007, 02:38:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Concerned', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'L')ets get to the core issue here. Sustainable civilisation. Our choices? We hear the term sustainability bandied about. What does it mean? What choices do we face? Let's keep it simple...


I'm more in favor of Economic Democracy than any of the above choices.

With a move towards a steady state type economy and voluntary incentive based population reduction programs. E.g. Instead of two couples two children each suggest incentives for one couple one child or more than one couple (community) to look after less children than total couples.


Anything short of a total reeducation of the masses away from shopkeerism is our only salvation. As long as we entertain any notion of markets, be they small or big, we will not get away from the logic of their dialectic....capitalism.

Even were you to reduce the population to one billion, any attempt to maintain a market mechanism within that scenario, democratic or otherwise (in fact the corporate structure was precisely an attempt at the democraticisation of the economy by the then bourgeoisie in an age of feudalism) will by the very logic of its systemic imperatives evolve into forms of capital ownership conducive to efficient and maximum profiteering. You simply cannot avoid this market impulse.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby coyote » Fri 07 Sep 2007, 04:25:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'A')s long as we entertain any notion of markets, be they small or big, we will not get away from the logic of their dialectic....capitalism.

Does that include farmers' markets?

Barter, as a market mechanism, has existed for a long long time. Financial capitalism is quite a newfangled concept. Capitalism and communism are both modernist, progress-addicted isms with little relation to the real world. Communism says no more about conservation, population control, or respect for and preservation of the landbase than does capitalism. This isn't an either/or any longer. We need to find the third handle.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he fundamental structure of the ideal marxist economy is embodied in the writings of the great man, we do not have far to go.

Wow... did you read the thing? I suppose families are toast if the human race is to survive:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Marx and Engels', 'A')bolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

This is what we should strive for? The abolition of the things that make us human? No. No more utopianism -- of any variety. We need, desperately, a system that allows us to be humans, instead of insisting we be angels.

Communism is dead. Capitalism is dying.

Look for the third handle.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby americandream » Fri 07 Sep 2007, 04:54:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'A')s long as we entertain any notion of markets, be they small or big, we will not get away from the logic of their dialectic....capitalism.

Does that include farmers' markets?

Barter, as a market mechanism, has existed for a long long time. Financial capitalism is quite a newfangled concept. Capitalism and communism are both modernist, progress-addicted isms with little relation to the real world. Communism says no more about conservation, population control, or respect for and preservation of the landbase than does capitalism. This isn't an either/or any longer. We need to find the third handle.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he fundamental structure of the ideal marxist economy is embodied in the writings of the great man, we do not have far to go.

Wow... did you read the thing? I suppose families are toast if the human race is to survive:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Marx and Engels', 'A')bolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

This is what we should strive for? The abolition of the things that make us human? No. No more utopianism -- of any variety. We need, desperately, a system that allows us to be humans, instead of insisting we be angels.

Communism is dead. Capitalism is dying.

Look for the third handle.


Looking at society objectively, each system be it a collectivistic organisation of society or a market oriented one, has its fundamental impulse.

A market driven society will, in time, find it's full realisation in capital. Capitalism is no more than the efficient organisation of the market for the maximum realistion of profit..yes..the same profit that motivates the stall holder to set up under his/her canvas on a sunday. In the course of realising that profit, resourcing in the form of labour and materials are brought to bear by degree.

Actually Marx does refer to the effect of the system of capital on the human in terms of his relationship with nature when he draws the attention of the reader to the fact that apart from the socio-economic effects of a system devoted purely to exchange, the effects on the individual are both alienation from himself and nature.

In creating a being conditioned to meet the narrow ends of labour and exchange, you in effect create the very source of associated problems such as planetary mismanagement. The one is a precursor of the other. They go hand in hand. A less than full man can never be truly in harmony with nature, his relationship with nature is as one dimensional as is his relationship with himself.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby Ludi » Fri 07 Sep 2007, 13:50:47

Civilization probably isn't sustainable. We need to come up with another model.


For why: "Ishmael" and "The Story of B" by Daniel Quinn

For how: "Beyond Civilization" by Daniel Quinn and "Permaculture: a designers manual" by Bill Mollison
Ludi
 

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby coyote » Fri 07 Sep 2007, 14:22:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'F')or how: "Beyond Civilization" by Daniel Quinn

That one I haven't read yet. It's now on the list.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: Our dilemma

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 13 Sep 2007, 05:24:37

Some people insist on confusing economics with government.

A market economy where production is guided by market signals is always preferable to an economy where production decisions are decided by dictat.

Even a simple economy requires millions of price signals to function properly. Central planners are not up to the task. Their poor decisions and bogus 5-year plans have been proven time and again not to work. There is really no point to argue this fact. Communism failed just like many socialist experiments.

Now that is different than taxing wealth and re-distributing it according to public need. You can tax wealth creation to save the environment and encourage or discourage certain behavior if you choose. What you cannot do is tax your way to prosperity.

The means of production in private hands will always produce more wealth than under public control. Unfortunately, we live in an age when even supposedly free market economies routinely tax away up to 50% of privately generated wealth for the public good (i.e. a wealth transfer from the most productive to the least productive citizens). That is fine I suppose if there is a greater good? Unfortunately, I doubt it.

What rubs me the wrong way is that governments interfer in the market all the time for the public good, and then when it all ends in a mess everyone blames it on the markets instead of on themselves as voters and taxpayers. How can you have a perfect system run by idiots?

Marxism indeed. The last 'ism' I would trust to manage my economy! It sounds like someone got too much Political Science 101 and not enough Real Politik?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron