Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The Future Is Now

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby mark » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 23:46:42

Can the rich survive, even thrive, the end of oil? Well, they always have in the past, why, because money and power offer more options. Some move to where they see greater opportunity, like Jim Rodgers, the investor, who’s chosen Singapore. Others choose to circle the wagons, which is what I see happening within the lower 48. When the rich circle their wagons, they’ll need serfs to do the actual work. Fortunately, for them, there are plenty of people who will gladly proffer their allegiance in exchange for a chance at the crumbs, after all, it's what they've been doing for centuries since the last collapse.

Of course, the real question is how sudden the collapse comes. In 2000, England experienced a taste of collapse when a truckers strike depleted store shelves and gas supplies in a few days. It lasted just a short time but does provide a clue to what can happen. If that is in our future then yes, I’ll agree that all, rich included, will fall into the black pit.
Who is John Galt?
mark
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed 01 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: chicago

Re: The Future Is Now

Unread postby Blacksmith » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 23:53:52

Now is the present!
Employed senior
Blacksmith
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1064
Joined: Sun 13 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Athabasca, Alberta

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby coyote » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 00:21:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'A')fter reading the NG article on the Maya, i'm starting to think you might be right on no one escaping. In their case they all pretty much disappeared.

The Mayan civilization collapsed, but they by no means all disappeared. Some Mayan areas continued to develop beyond the main crash. They were still around to be conquered, one city-state at a time, by the Spanish in the 15th and 16th centuries; and they're still around today. What they lost was empire, population, knowledge, and the highest art. And that may be what happens to us as well. We are not the only culture to have tinkered with civilization; we may become, like the Maya, just another example of a failed civilization experiment, in which people afterward go back to an older way of living.

The civilization that succeeds will be the one that permits the coexistence of an older way of living alongside new technology, new ideas and new art. Knowledge development without land development. Maybe it'll be us; or perhaps some later, more successful civilization experiment.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby TreebeardsUncle » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 00:48:20

Expect conditions will be fairly mild and even boring to the gloom patrol that inhabits this board.
TreebeardsUncle
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 683
Joined: Thu 15 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: The Future Is Now

Unread postby jboogy » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 00:58:11

beautiful animal eli,I got a tennessee walker named Suge,He's a big ,silly luv bug.But he can't fly.....yet!
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby skeptik » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 02:13:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jack', '
')But then, it's been suggested by many that I'm a sociopath - a title I wear with pride.


'Intelligent socialised psychopath' would be a better description, or one of the 'Snakes in Suits' as the acknowledged world expert on the subject, Dr. Robert Hare calls them. 'Sociopath' doesn't quite fit.

I get the impression that you DONT indulge in stupid anti-social behaviour likely to get yourself in trouble with the law.

DSM-IV definition of Antisocial Personality Disorder
http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/disor ... cialpd.htm

I dont think this applies to you, Jack. Hares construct of psychopath fits the bill better. This is of course only my personal opinion based on your posts, and should not be taken seriously. Only a qualified psychologist or psychiatrist trained in the use of PCL-R (Hares psychopath checklist revised version) is qualified to make this diagnosis.
User avatar
skeptik
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Wed 24 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Costa Geriatrica, Spain

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby SILENTTODD » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 03:16:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I')'ve long disagreed with the idea that the rich will be able to buy their way out of the consequences of a ravaged Earth.

The experience of what it is to be rich will be radically redefined . . . downward.

Remember in "Soylent Green" when a stick of celery was considered an outrageous luxury?

Yes, there will still be unequal distribution of wealth, but when the Earth itself is severely impoverished, there will be less for the rich, too.

A rising tide lifts all boats, but the opposite is also true!


This is a subject you and I agree totally Heineken.

The rich as we define them today will not always be with us.

The Paris Hilton type refuse will have to start selling their asses on the street at the going rate like everyone else, since they have seemingly have no other marketable skills.
Last edited by SILENTTODD on Mon 06 Aug 2007, 13:35:33, edited 1 time in total.
Skeptical scrutiny in both Science and Religion is the means by which deep thoughts are winnowed from deep nonsense-Carl Sagan
User avatar
SILENTTODD
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 928
Joined: Sat 06 May 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Corona, CA

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 09:19:53

The pie can be divided only so many times, and so many ways. Especially a SHRINKING pie.

I also don't buy this idea that the poor can be pushed around forever, no matter how bad conditions get.

Ultimate power rests in the hands of the masses, not the rich minority. Yes, the masses have sheep-like qualities, but once they start to panic and stampede, watch out.

The rich learned that lesson in Russia and France.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby Cloud9 » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 09:46:02

Mary Chesnut, the real Scarlet O’Hara owned seven plantations and over 1,000 slaves. At the end of the Civil War, she found her self living in the chimney of one of her burned out homes. She went into business with one of her former slaves selling eggs just to survive. People adapt.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby MalcolmV » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 10:18:20

Diamond in Collapse said that being one of the elite in the Greenland Norse colony merely meant that you were the last to starve.
MalcolmV
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun 27 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Ontario

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby gg3 » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 11:20:49

First of all, the enormous spread in wealth that presently exists, is a side-effect of a stored energy economy with cheap energy sources.

There is no way to replace oil with slaves or serfs. It can't be done; the energy density of oil is too high. For example, a typical mid-sized excavator used in mining operations, has an engine in the range of about 900 to 1,800 horsepower. A typical human can put out about 1/4 horsepower continuously, and 1/3 to 1/2 horsepower in brief bursts.

Thus it would take 3,600 to 7,200 humans to equal the output of that one power shovel, not counting the additional 500 hp. quarry truck (2,000 humans) to haul the stuff from the mine to the mill. In fact the typical ratio is more like four quarry trucks for each shovel... so now we have 8,000 humans hauling the stuff from the pit to the mill...

Do similar calculations for combine harvesters and other agricultural equipment.

Bottom line is, when the poo hits the propeller, everyone gets it in the face.

There may be isolated neofeudal fiefdoms, but the elite in those societies are going to be living like the lower middle classes of today, if they're lucky.

There will also be pockets of representative democracy and free enterprise, with a higher level of generalized prosperity ("the profit motive: it's for everybody") though with their most fortunate members still having to do an honest day's work rather than relying on slaveys.

And there'll be a good range in between, as well as places that are Taliban-like theocracies in miniature, and places that are micro-monarchies (oh boy! a new neologism! "micro-monarchies"!), and places that are tiny anarchist syndicates and communist collectivities and all of it. Everything we've seen through history will be replicated in the future, on fractal scales from the tiny village to the city-state.

Your mission is to put yourself in the place that will develop into the kind of society in which you personally want to live, and then to develop for yourself a useful niche using your available skills or new skills you start learning ASAP.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby NotMyBlood » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 12:44:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')he pie can be divided only so many times, and so many ways. Especially a SHRINKING pie.

I also don't buy this idea that the poor can be pushed around forever, no matter how bad conditions get.

Ultimate power rests in the hands of the masses, not the rich minority. Yes, the masses have sheep-like qualities, but once they start to panic and stampede, watch out.

The rich learned that lesson in Russia and France.


The day is coming. In another thread I was accussed of being "out of touch" with the working poor. I'll admit my circle is middle to upper class. I see a tremendous amount of wealth spread over a large portion of people. We are extremely lucky in this country. However, there is a growing population of "working poor". And its not people being "selfish" or "wanting something for nothing". Its honest people just trying ot make ends meet(although I think a good portion just wants something for free). My argument is , if the extermination of the middle class continues instead of the so called "working poor" being the minority it will quickly become the Majority. The PTB or Super Wealthy or the winners of the "Gilded Age" should be concerned about this seemingly unavoidable development.

When I see stories like Blackstone who's members are worth millions and millions buying out a company in Colorado, dismantling it, laying off the workers and making a "small" profit. it makes we want to puke, then I want just beat the shit out of them, then I get angry......

Where is our Jimmy Hoffa???
User avatar
NotMyBlood
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri 29 Jun 2007, 03:00:00

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby Smudger » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 13:04:05

Getty once said if at midnight everyone in the world had equal share of the total money by early afternoon the next day someone would be bankrupt. he was right and the only really issue is the size of the cake. to my mind it is telling that the for most developed countries the concept of "poverty" in the real sense of the world as fallen away somewhat. In the UK for instance I believe the discussion is currently revolving around whether a lack of a tv in each bedroom is a sign of poverty.! I which case i live in poverty as I wont allow them in my room.

i do detect a hidden "its not fair some people have a lot of money" theme running through a lot of the sites, implying in some way that peak oil, climte change is all the rich peoples fault! Then if these same rich people start driving priuss' or recycling and buying local food its "are well they can afford to can't they" we should never envy what other people have if they have earned it.
User avatar
Smudger
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu 05 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Great Britain

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby MalcolmV » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 13:40:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Smudger', 'w')e should never envy what other people have if they have earned it.


In what way has a hedge fund manager earned a billion dollar a year compensation? Has he created any wealth? He won that money in a lottery by manipulating a financial system which was designed to allow him to be able to do so. Whose pocket does that money come out of? The financial system has been destabilized and the crash that these guys are causing will hurt us all.

[url=http://ottawa.indymedia.ca/en/2007/07/4786.shtml]
For One Billion You Get...[/url] warning socialist propaganda



"Behind every great fortune there is a crime." Francis Bacon
MalcolmV
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun 27 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Ontario
Top

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby NotMyBlood » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 13:49:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MalcolmV', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Smudger', 'w')e should never envy what other people have if they have earned it.


In what way has a hedge fund manager earned a billion dollar a year compensation? Has he created any wealth? He won that money in a lottery by manipulating a financial system which was designed to allow him to be able to do so. Whose pocket does that money come out of? The financial system has been destabilized and the crash that these guys are causing will hurt us all.

[url=http://ottawa.indymedia.ca/en/2007/07/4786.shtml]
For One Billion You Get...[/url] warning socialist propaganda



"Behind every great fortune there is a crime." Francis Bacon



I agree with both statements actually. However, I think if things continue at present course in the US, it wont matter how you earned your wealth.
User avatar
NotMyBlood
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri 29 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 13:54:21

Malcolm V makes an excellent point.

The super-rich don't earn their money, they extort it. Or are simply given it.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 14:15:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Ultimate power rests in the hands of the masses, not the rich minority. Yes, the masses have sheep-like qualities, but once they start to panic and stampede, watch out.

Yet feudal systems were longest lasting ones...
These are most stable systems in low energy world...which we are to enter soon.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he rich learned that lesson in Russia and France.

...so now they are better armed.
You will not win a battle wielding your handgun against helicopter gunship...

I doubt that revolutions stand great chance to succeed in post PO world.
Neofeudal slavery is in store.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 14:30:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', 'Y')ou will not win a battle wielding your handgun against helicopter gunship...


The helicopter gunship might win the battle, but the handgun will win the war.

We saw that in Vietnam and it is being demonstrated again in Iraq.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby jedinvest » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 14:41:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')...so now they are better armed.
You will not win a battle wielding your handgun against helicopter gunship...

I doubt that revolutions stand great chance to succeed in post PO world.
Neofeudal slavery is in store.


I have my eye on Iraq for how asymmetrical warfare can play out. Also, U.S. government against Iraqui people versus U.S. government against American people. What's the difference? Those with oil versus those without oil. Guns are a good defense in complete anarchy. IEDs are much better in asymmetrical warfare if that is what the future holds.
jedinvest
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Location: No. Calif.
Top

Re: A MORE LIKELY FUTURE

Unread postby NotMyBlood » Mon 06 Aug 2007, 14:44:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')Ultimate power rests in the hands of the masses, not the rich minority. Yes, the masses have sheep-like qualities, but once they start to panic and stampede, watch out.

Yet feudal systems were longest lasting ones...
These are most stable systems in low energy world...which we are to enter soon.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he rich learned that lesson in Russia and France.

...so now they are better armed.
You will not win a battle wielding your handgun against helicopter gunship...

I doubt that revolutions stand great chance to succeed in post PO world.
Neofeudal slavery is in store.



I disagree, the citizens of America are well armed. Well armed. And have a 'unique' attitude - 'live free or Die'. That attitude my have been replaced a little with Corporate messages to "shop" , take some designer drugs and obey, but its still there; It manifest itself in different forms now. "Get rich or die trying' for example. Americans are "Proud" people. There wont be to many "knowingly" working in feudal system.
User avatar
NotMyBlood
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 306
Joined: Fri 29 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron