Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Toyota Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby Terrapin » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 18:54:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'W')hat do you propose Tony?
Well, I'm only one person and have no more insight into the future than others. What I'm convinced of is that we first of all need our leaders to recognize the limits of this planet and then to start a massive education campaign to get that fact into the general consciousness. Only then can we start to contemplate the massive societal changes that would be required for sustainability. What those changes will be, I can only guess at. There needs to be a lot of research, open debate and cross-party consensus.


People have an incredible distrust of big government and until they see a need for something they tend to disbelieve what they are merely told (for example: global warming skeptics). We are probably lucky that there is only as much oil as there is so we can only do so much damage with it. On the other hand there is that pesky coal problem that will also need to be dealt with if we are going to charge off the grid. Its one redeeming quality is that it is the best candidate for carbon capture and sequestration…

I was reading something about China the other day (was it here?) where they mentioned that historically countries tend to mess up the environment as they get richer before they start to clean the environment up again. The author had hope that with the coming Olympics pressure could be put successfully on China to clean up their coal burning act.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')gain, what is the alternative to sustainability? It can only be collapse.


This is true but I have hope that collapse can be more of a deconstruction than an implosion. We have been living beyond “sustainable” for a while now. It is not clear how much longer we have. The question becomes when the cheap fuel is burned up will we be able to transition in an orderly fashion to sustainability and population reduction or will we degenerate into some form of a Mad Max world?.

I get depressed thinking about it too but I thought the end of the world was coming back in the 1970s when I had to wait 3 hours in a line for gasoline. I was wrong then (at least about the timing). When I get too depressed I take hope in the fact that I have been wrong before.
User avatar
Terrapin
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: NW California

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby retiredguy » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 19:13:41

I saw the results of a poll the other day concerning "must have applicances." Cars were number one ten years ago and they remain number one today.

Considering the infrastructure we have built around the car in the US, this is going to be one big hurdle to jump.
User avatar
retiredguy
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Tue 11 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: southern Wisconsin

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby TonyPrep » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 19:21:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') was reading something about China the other day (was it here?) where they mentioned that historically countries tend to mess up the environment as they get richer before they start to clean the environment up again.
Well, that may be true per unit of energy, per unit of economy or per capita but, so far as CO2 is concerned, the trend is up overall, even in richer countries.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') have hope that collapse can be more of a deconstruction than an implosion.
I have that hope too but, as long as people and governments don't understand what sustainability is, I don't have much of it.
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby Twilight » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 19:41:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') know that the last hospital I used to work in had dedicated “monitor” circuits for fancy electronics. I had been told that those circuits were extra “clean” without surges and spikes. (Maybe that was also to reduce appliance induced harmonics?).

I wonder how big a problem it is?


Could work both ways, everything else was probably causing local power quality issues, and certain items of equipment need to be protected. You don't want the stuff next door passing on its noise, that applies to an academic laboratory environment too.

It used to be an industrial oddity, but it is becoming more prevalent, when you consider the number of digital electronic devices in a typical modern home or office building. More research is having to be done into it, and system operators are having to adapt their equipment.

It's just part of the ongoing battle to accommodate what people choose to do with the service you're providing.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby ohanian » Tue 06 Mar 2007, 20:15:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Twilight', 'I') read a news snippet last week about some argument over whether or not a school in (I think) Australia was going to have air conditioning, as temperatures would hit maximums of 27 deg C during term time. Some idiot was saying the needs of the kids must come first.


The obvious solution is to bury the school.

I mean seriously, it's cooler underground than it is above ground. Put the classroom underground (with no windows) and run a ducted fan to suck external air into the classroom. The air can be pre-cool using the ground as a heat sink.
User avatar
ohanian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun 17 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby MOCKBA » Wed 07 Mar 2007, 02:14:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Terrapin', 'I') am not saying it will be easy. It could well be that “driving” does disappear completely but it is not going to happen this decade so let’s help folks make the transition to it rather than trying to do something impossible.

Yeah, buy a motorcycle or better yet a Vespa - great gas mileage. Soon you would be able to buy motorcycles very cheap in US to help original owners pay for the gas for his truck which still would be his main vehicle
User avatar
MOCKBA
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 458
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota developing plug-in hybrid, researching market

Postby gg3 » Wed 07 Mar 2007, 03:57:26

Terrapin, excellent analogy about launching the lifeboats in an orderly manner.

However that is also a high-syntropy solution because it has a high embodied information content: everyone has to behave in an orderly manner, rather than insisting on partying on deck until the ship is about to capsize and then clawing & scratching their way to the front of the line for the lifeboats. The greater the degree of syntropy, the lower the probability, so I still think it's more likely that the fertilizer will hit the ventilator.

---

Transport will end up requiring an increasing degree of individual ingenuity, and different vehicles for different purposes.

Someone might have a bicycle for their local errands, and an electric bubble car such as the Zap Xebra for local runs involving multiple passengers or bulky cargo. They would be a member of a car-sharing club for occasional access to a biodiesel/hybrid for longer trips to destinations that were not practical for bus or rail. They would tend to use public transport for repeat trips such as commuting, and intercity rail or bus for leisure travel. Air travel would be reserved for emergencies such as visiting someone in the hospital or going to a funeral.

Tradesworkers would still have their minivans and pickup trucks, but these would be biodiesel plug-in hybrids or electrics. (I have just started looking into the issue of how to get my local client site visits back on 2 wheels again, havng tried it years ago and found it not feasible at the time; we'll see if it works this time...) Tradesworkers who don't need to carry tools & materials to sites, e.g. after having deposited same on site on the first day of a multi-day project, could use motor scooters or bicycles depending on distance.

What's needed badly is something very much like the Twike pedal/electric hybrid, except a) mass-produced at lower first cost, i.e. under $10k, b) thin-film flexible PV material permanently applied to the roof for supplementary daylight charging, c) replace the tiller with a steering wheel or handlebars so you can balance against inertia on turns (tillers are OK in slow delivery vehicles, see also the classic "S&D Freighter" of the 1920s), d) enable it to run on pedal power only, which is not possible with the Twike as presently designed, and would extend range considerably on flat ground.

What's also needed is to get people over the idiotic idea that a mode of transportation has to resemble a living room. A cushioned seat, an enclosed compartment in which to sit, fresh air ventilation and perhaps heat for the winter, and a radio for essential information on the road, are sufficient in most cases. In hot climates, air conditioning, as a disability-access feature, on prescription, for those who have relevant health conditions.

---

Schools underground: Yes, but windowless rooms, no. What you do is build the classrooms around a central courtyard that is exposed to the sky (perhaps with a glass roof?), or you use earth berms to get the needed thermal benefits in above-ground construction.

Homes: ditto. However, in residential construction, unlike in commercial & institutional buildings with fulltime professional maintenance staff, we need methods for waterproofing and damp/moistureproofing that can last the life of the structure.

---

About tradesman bicycles.

The problem is carrying tools.

First of all, large backpacks are ruled out due to issues of muscular/skeletal health impact. Weight belongs on wheels, that's what wheels are for.

Second, only small light loads on the handlebars due to steering safety issues. However, a container up front could be used for carrying a lunchbox if needed, and should be built like an automobile glove compartment (solid walls, bottom-hinged door facing the rider).

Third, the standard rear rack is insufficint in terms of a) weight capacity and b) position. Half of it is practically below the seat, and loads hanging over the rear are a no-go due to weight distribution.

Fourth, side panniers are OK but need to be made of solid material, fabric panniers are a bad joke for tradesman applications. Intelligently-designed panniers (creationists can go eat poo, we engineers own that phrase dammit!) should be rectangular and have access from the sides as well as from the top (hinged top & side panels, lockable). With panniers attached, having top surfaces flush with those of the carrying rack, a wider load could be placed on the rack. This should still be a relatively light load and not too large.

The design concept I'm presently working on would involve side panniers and a light folding handcart designed to easily mount the panniers to it whilst on client sites.

One pannier for the usual telco tool kit (more than rugged enough to handle bumps etc.), plus one to hold a knapsack with a laptop (a thousand bucks of delicate electronics bouncing around on the road, eek!). That leaves the other laptop (yes we carry two: one PC, one Mac) in a knapsack on my back, which is an unacceptable design compromise longterm but could be tolerated short-term.

The folding hand cart would basically need to be a frame with wheels, having brackets designed to hold the panniers; it would be strapped to the rear rack above the panniers while on the road. Thus the bike could be locked on the street, and all of the gear hooked onto the handcart to take up to the client's site. Though, what I'm actually going to do here is contact all my bikeable clients and have them ask their building management about the rules re. bringing bikes on the elevators, since leaving a bike on the street around here is asking for it to be vandalized or worse.

Better of course would be a detachable bike trailer that could actually function as a hand cart on its own, though again, the issue arises as to "what to bring on site" vs. "what to lock up (and risk) on the street."

BTW the Extracycle mod won't work for me, it makes the bike too long to get on elevators. And speaking of elevators, scoping out the elevators at the BART (underground/subway) stations in the relevant areas is also an issue that has to be solved up front: the bike has to go in the elevator with both wheels on the ground.

I'll post something around here somewhere when I have results to report....
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby Starvid » Sat 04 Aug 2007, 20:22:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')oyota Motor Corp.'s plug-in electric car may have less than half the range of a competing vehicle planned by General Motors Corp., people with knowledge of both companies' development programs said.

GM wants its Chevrolet Volt to travel at least 40 miles after being charged at a normal household outlet, while the Toyota model may go no more than 20 miles on a single charge, said the people, who asked not to be identified because details of the plans are still secret.

But you know what?

"Only" 20 miles sounds great too.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Toyota said on July 25 it will road-test experimental plug- in Prius cars this year in the U.S. and Japan. The cars go about eight miles on a charge, Toyota Executive Vice President Masatami Takimoto said at a press conference in Tokyo.

A plug-in Prius for the consumer market would probably go farther, said Jaycie Chitwood, a U.S. senior strategic planner with Toyota's advanced vehicle group in Torrance, California. She declined to provide Toyota's target range.

Toyota believes producing an electric car with a range of 40 miles or more can't be done at a cost that would make the vehicle affordable for most consumers, she said, citing the need for advanced batteries and special recharging equipment. ``We're not going that route because of those obstacles,'' she said.

A plug-in Prius probably would have an electricity-only range of 20 miles or less, and maybe as little as 10 miles, according to a person with direct knowledge of Toyota's plans who didn't want to be identified.

Mmmm...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz said in June he's confident GM can overcome any obstacles to producing an electric car with a 40-mile range. GM says that target is significant because more than half of Americans live within 20 miles of their jobs. The automaker hopes to patent technology that would extend the range beyond 40 miles, people with direct knowledge of the plans said.

GM showed its Volt concept car in January and aims to have a drivable prototype in early 2008 that travels about 10 miles on a charge, the people said. The 40-mile Volt would follow in 2009 and might go on sale by the end of the decade, they said.

Things are actually moving. Maybe they'll celebrate the 2010 peak by introducing the Volt? :wink:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '`')`The market is going to sort out which one is best,'' Paine said in an interview from San Francisco. ``GM is taking a bigger risk, and I applaud them for that.''

Indeed.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... refer=home

Image
And the Volt does look totally Gothamishly kick-ass. When it comes out I might even get a drivers license.
Image
And, I never thought I'd say this, buy an American car.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby Novus » Sat 04 Aug 2007, 22:09:59

GM actually has quite a few smart people working for them it is just management always kills whatever ideas their research departments come up with. In the 90s GM produced an electric car with an 80 mile range. They know how to make these things but they choose not to make them.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby joe1347 » Sat 04 Aug 2007, 22:27:20

The other difference between Toyota and GM is that Toyota will likely be selling a short range plug-in Prius in a few years while GM delays selling the Volt due to 'engineering problems'.

What's GM's USA market share today - low 30 percent range. GM will be lucky to have 20% in not that many years unless they start offering cars (in the US market) with high fuel efficiency.
Last edited by joe1347 on Sun 05 Aug 2007, 09:32:42, edited 1 time in total.
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." Homer Simpson
User avatar
joe1347
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon 05 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby PraiseDoom » Sat 04 Aug 2007, 23:22:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '
')But you know what?

"Only" 20 miles sounds great too.



Yup. Means I can lead a nearly gasoline free existence. Could come in handy, 2 years into this post peak world.
User avatar
PraiseDoom
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 23 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby steam_cannon » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 00:05:12

This is like if Toyota was planning to build bicycle factories.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')oyota Motor Corp.'s plug-in electric car may have less than half the range
Or they could be messing with GM and be about to come out with a car that goes twice as far as GM's. Personally, I won't believe any claims until there are product sitting in the dealership, that goes for both of them. It's just, something smells fishy about all of this. The technology and market should be there to do much better then this.

So what's going on? Is Toyota planning to sell super cheap electric cars to a severely impoverished America (too poor to buy a better EV) or have they misread the market. Toyota has done better then this, all the players have done better then this. So you have to assume there is a market plan and niche they are planning to fill... What is it?

"The Toyota Rav4 EV had a 100-mile range"
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-6153394-7.html

"I've had electric cars since 1990, but they were conversions that somebody fixed up in their garage. My first car was a Datsun conversion and it got 25 miles per charge. My second was an old Volkswagon Rabbit that got 50 miles per charge. So, when my friend, the actor Ed Begley, told me about the EV1 and that it got 70 to 100 miles per charge, I thought, Wow that's paradise!"
http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/223/paul-interview.html
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby Eli » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 01:02:32

It all comes down to batteries that is the only tech that they are working. The motors are known quantity.

GM I think has a better line on Iron Phosphate batteries. If you could build a battery that could hold the power of 5 gallons of gasoline you could own the world.

Or at least a nice little chunk of it.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby cube » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 03:58:20

I never understood the logic of "plug in" hybrids.

what's the point?

A hybrid can NEVER be designed to have batteries hold enough energy for a decent range because if it did then there's no point in being a hybrid. You might as well just go full electric. If such a car was ever made it would be the dumbest transportation invention since the advent of the Segway. Another reason of course is if you wanted a decent range you'd have to carry so many batteries there wouldn't be any space left for an engine-generator and a fuel tank.

This brings us back to batteries that have such a small range what's the point in plugging it in?
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby nero » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 05:00:59

Well I think a plug-in electric car with limited range is adequate for most situations as long as there is the backup of the gasoline engine. The big problem with pure electric cars is the fear that the average consumer will have that they will get stuck in the middle of nowhere without any way to power up the car.

The statistics of the car under gasoline power don't have to be great. There just needs to be a way to get the darn thing home if your batteries are dead.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby yesplease » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 13:50:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'T')his brings us back to batteries that have such a small range what's the point in plugging it in?
Hybridization allows for the engine to operate relatively efficiently by using the battery pack as an energy sink. Provided the pack isn't discharged too deeply, there's no reason not to top it off w/ electricity if the useful work costs less than the same work done via gasoline. The current iteration could supposedly cut fuels costs by a lot if charged at night, even w/ the relatively small range.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')urrent Range: 13km

Operating costs are also lower. Toyota estimates that, in Japan, the plug-in Prius will cost 8% less to run if recharging is conducted during the daytime. If recharging is carried out at night, when electricity is cheaper, that savings could rise to 41%.


Wrt Toyota's relatively small range, they signed an agreement w/ Cobasys regarding NiMH battery use, and one of the evident restrictions was killing the production/use of the EV-95 battery. Ya know, the one in the RAV-4 EV logging well over 100k miles, maybe even over 200k in some instances for all I know. It was also speculated that the deal w/ Cobasys involved no plug-in capabilities for any Toyota models in the states, so take that as you will...

The Prius Toyota demo'd in Japan likely had EV mode enabled, a charger and all the little tweaks to the onboard comps need for this, and twice the NiMH battery pack size. The Volt's range is based on LI-whatever batteries, which have a pretty hefty price tag AFAIK.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')M has not stated a target price for the Volt, but the lithium-ion batteries alone would cost upward of $10,000 today, Posawatz said.


Based on the changes in the vehicle and history, Toyota can likely come out w/ a plug-in Prius for a few grand more right now, but they may not be allowed to sell it in the states. GM's supposed range for the volt is based on batteries that aren't economical right now, if they used NiMH batts and priced it at the same price of a Prius, it'd probably have about the same range.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Professor Membrane', ' ')Not now son, I'm making ... TOAST!
User avatar
yesplease
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3765
Joined: Tue 03 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby lper100km » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 14:36:40

At some point, 20 miles range will seem to be a wonderful accomplishment. 40 miles range will seem miraculous. Roughly, that limits average human movement to a distance of 20 mile max from home base in any direction and traveling at a speed of maybe 25 mph. Sort of equivalent to horse back distances. Wells Fargo redux.

Think about this. The ability to own even one of these vehicles is going to be drastically limited. Why? Because initial acceptance will be slow – who wants to ride around in a tarted up golf cart when Mr. Jones still has his big shiny SUV – and by the time every one really wants one – because Mr. Jones has finally decided that he wants one – it will be too late. Suddenly there is a demand to replace the domestic auto fleet with EVs, Wow. In 2003, the total no. of passenger vehicles alone in the USA was 231,000,000. Max sales ever recorded was in 2001, with roughly 8m vehicles sold. Average is more like 2-3m/yr. So, let’s say that the industry can retool and produce 10m EVs per yr. That will be 23 years to replace the total existing fleet in all its redundancies, not even allowing for replacements after a nominal 5yr. effective life. If a 5yr effective life is factored in, the fleet size will never grow beyond 50m unless manufacturing is increased further. And all of this starts in which year?? The scale of this is enormous. Can it be done? Who knows, but I would think the odds are against it.

As the crisis deepens, all manufacturing will be impeded by lack of materials, manufacturing energy, work force shrinkage and the unreliability of delivering any products over long distances. Add to this, the inevitable deterioration of highways and local roads – lack of bitumen, for example – so better make that EV an EV_ATV, and get maybe 10 miles range at 5mph. And, who says there will be a reliable electrical grid in the future to provide that convenient, overnight battery charge?

Sell GM, Toyota and invest in stud farms.

Or walk.
For those who understand, no explanation is necessary.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
User avatar
lper100km
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon 05 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Over the tracks, left under the overpass, right, third boxcar on the left, ask for Jack

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby Twilight » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 16:05:01

It's better to have an imperfect product selling and feeding information back than it is to have a perfect product on the drawing board while the banks own your factories.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby cube » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 17:47:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('yesplease', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'T')his brings us back to batteries that have such a small range what's the point in plugging it in?
Hybridization allows for the engine to operate relatively efficiently by using the battery pack as an energy sink.
Short answer yes. The long answer is that technically speaking an ICE engine runs most efficiently at a constant speed. As is the case with most things in life the most ideal situation is impossible. The 2nd best scenario is to NOT make rapid changes in engine speed but instead do it VERY slowly. Hybridization makes this possible by using a small battery pack to act as an energy sink to help smooth out the contradictory desire to run an ICE engine at a constant speed to maximize efficiency and the natural tendency to drive cars at varying speeds for example stop and go traffic.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')rovided the pack isn't discharged too deeply, there's no reason not to top it off w/ electricity if the useful work costs less than the same work done via gasoline.
I lost count how many people claim electricity is supposedly "cheaper" then gasoline. I'll save that for another debate.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he current iteration could supposedly cut fuels costs by a lot if charged at night, even w/ the relatively small range.
Call me lazy but I don't feel like plugging in a car every time just to get a 20 mile range.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Toyota Electric Car May Have Half the Range of GM's

Postby Starvid » Sun 05 Aug 2007, 19:21:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lper100km', 'A')t some point, 20 miles range will seem to be a wonderful accomplishment. 40 miles range will seem miraculous. Roughly, that limits average human movement to a distance of 20 mile max from home base in any direction and traveling at a speed of maybe 25 mph. Sort of equivalent to horse back distances. Wells Fargo redux.

Actually, you have just described my lead-acid electric scooter. 40 miles range at 30 miles per hour.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') lost count how many people claim electricity is supposedly "cheaper" then gasoline. I'll save that for another debate.

Full charge is about 2 kWh and eben after all the horrible taxes that's just 25 cents for 40 miles. Very cheap.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')all me lazy but I don't feel like plugging in a car every time just to get a 20 mile range.

I do it everytime...

And if you are so lazy you can't stand plugging in, I hope you aren't lazy enough to jump on the bike and bike 20 miles. Or as the saying goes "what you don't have in your head you better have in your legs".
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron