Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Oil and Inflation Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Peak Oil and the Inflation Lie

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 20 May 2007, 15:00:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')In the coastal cities, house prices have gone up at least 100% in the last five years, so a correction of 20% is HIGHLY deflationary.


The government and in particular the SS administration calculate inflation and the resultant COLAs on a year-to-year basis. If they waited five years while hoping for some deflation, the government would save money but SS recipients would fall far behind the inflation rate. 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Peak Oil and the Inflation Lie

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 20 May 2007, 15:13:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')In the coastal cities, house prices have gone up at least 100% in the last five years, so a correction of 20% is HIGHLY deflationary.


The government and in particular the SS administration calculate inflation and the resultant COLAs on a year-to-year basis. If they waited five years while hoping for some deflation, the government would save money but SS recipients would fall far behind the inflation rate. 8)


Do you have inside information that allows you to propogate this anti-conspiracy theory?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Peak Oil and the Inflation Lie

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 20 May 2007, 15:42:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')In the coastal cities, house prices have gone up at least 100% in the last five years, so a correction of 20% is HIGHLY deflationary.


The government and in particular the SS administration calculate inflation and the resultant COLAs on a year-to-year basis. If they waited five years while hoping for some deflation, the government would save money but SS recipients would fall far behind the inflation rate. 8)


Do you have inside information that allows you to propogate this anti-conspiracy theory?



Nope. Just the information on prices and inflation etc. that is publically available and widely reported in the media. The rules on annual SS COLA increases have been in operation for decades. Do you have evidence that there is yet another secret conspiracy altering the data behind the inflation numbers and the SS COLAs? 8)
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Peak Oil and the Inflation Lie

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 20 May 2007, 15:53:46

Its in your neighborhood. Tell us what you know about it.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Peak Oil and the Inflation Lie

Unread postby threadbear » Sun 20 May 2007, 15:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', ' ')In the coastal cities, house prices have gone up at least 100% in the last five years, so a correction of 20% is HIGHLY deflationary.


The government and in particular the SS administration calculate inflation and the resultant COLAs on a year-to-year basis. If they waited five years while hoping for some deflation, the government would save money but SS recipients would fall far behind the inflation rate. 8)


Do you have inside information that allows you to propogate this anti-conspiracy theory?



Nope. Just the information on prices and inflation etc. that is publically available and widely reported in the media. The rules on annual SS COLA increases have been in operation for decades. Do you have evidence that there is yet another secret conspiracy altering the data behind the inflation numbers and the SS COLAs? 8)


Who you going to believe, govt stats or your own lying eyes? I take a good look around and listen to what people are actually saying from their own neck of the woods and completely and utterly dismiss the load of bullocks that comes out of govt stats.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both ends

Unread postby seldom_seen » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 01:20:27

The rising cost of oil leads to a rising cost of gasoline, food, and just about everything else that is transported, constructed or somehow associated with oil (or just about everything). An offshoot of this problem is the sudden move to offset runaway oil prices by using different forms of fuel. In this case food, to power our machines in the form of palm, sugar cane, or corn based fuel stocks.

This in turn, creates a loop, which then comes right back around and causes inflation in food prices to gather even more momentum. A problem pushing poor people to the edge in Guatemala, Mexico, Indonesia (and probably other places I don't know about).

Our economic chieftans, the federal reserve, have recognized this problem and come rushing to the rescue like firefighters with buckets of kerosene to create more and more inflation by pumping up the money supply. An effort to "juice" or "jumpstart" the economy by making more money available for people to buy stuff. While at the same time trying to hide any evidence of this by concealing or convoluting economic data related to money supply and inflation.

The economy unfortunately does not run on money. It runs on oil (and NG, coal, topsoil). Thus the candle is burning at both ends and the flames are closing in from both sides.

The question remains. Is this a cynical or malicious attempt by the federal reserve to flush our economy down the toilet? Or are economists as really decoupled from reality as many think? "Hey Ben, oil sure is getting expensive." "I know Alan, but we use dollars to buy oil, so let's just make some more dollars." "Brilliant, Ben!."

Here is a fella named Perry Arnett's take on this issue. I mostly agree with what he says except I'm not sure whether central bankers are really aware of resource depletion, or they are just responding like they always respond with cornucopian reflexes by printing more money because they really have no other option.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd while I cannot offer much proof at the moment of the following thesis, I submit that the recent ~18-24% INCREASE in world financial (fiat) liquidity, is a ‘tightly-coupled proxy’ for, and a derivative of a markedly similar DECREASE in available exosomatic energy resources. That is, I suspect the mechanism is such that since central bankers and other power brokers in governments are fully aware of Resource Depletion Theory, and Oil Depletion in particular, they have created for themselves an ‘ad hoc race’ to see who can drive the other guy into national bankruptcy first(!); ‘money’, in this case, serving as a last ditch GDP proxy tool replacing ‘real’ oil that no longer exists for ‘real’ wealth generation; sort of like playing King-of-the-Mountain. This suggests that as oil depletes further, fiat liquidity will continue to rise in similarly corresponding amounts.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AlasBabylon/message/32238
Last edited by Ferretlover on Wed 04 Mar 2009, 12:57:23, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Merged with THE Oil and Inflation Thread.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 05:34:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'T')he rising cost of oil leads to a rising cost of gasoline, food, and just about everything else that is transported, constructed or somehow associated with oil (or just about everything). An offshoot of this problem is the sudden move to offset runaway oil prices by using different forms of fuel. In this case food, to power our machines in the form of palm, sugar cane, or corn based fuel stocks.

The question remains. Is this a cynical or malicious attempt by the federal reserve to flush our economy down the toilet? Or are economists as really decoupled from reality as many think? "Hey Ben, oil sure is getting expensive." "I know Alan, but we use dollars to buy oil, so let's just make some more dollars." "Brilliant, Ben!."



First I absolutely love this thread title!

Secondly, I think your second proposition is the correct one, theoretical economists are totally decoupled from physical realities. We have seen it over and over again, everything they do or propose is based on assumptions. Let one assumption be wrong and they veere widely off plan as time goes forward. Of course this keeps them busy revising their master plan every 6 weeks or so to fit it to the curve reallity forces upon them, but so long as they insist on acting as of theory counts for more than reallity they will never be able to get a real handle on things.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 06:28:44

Blah, blah, blah. More of the same 'blame the economists' and 'policy makers' type posts we see every day on peak oil dot com.

I read far fewer posts about suggestions on how to solve post peak oil depletion or mitigate its economic effects?

Maybe oil consumers are decoupled from reality? Do not their low levels of savings and record levels of debt indicate that they too believe that growth and higher living standards can continue forever?

Did you happen to miss this report?

"Uncertainty about future oil supply makes it important to develop a strategy for addressing a peak and decline in oil production."
Source: United States Government Accountability Office Report

I think the title says a lot? But who is listening?

The very first paragraph states, "Oil is a global commodity, and its price is determined by the balance between world demand and supply." It does not get much simpler or straight forward, although I know economists are famous for mumble jumbo, right?

And peak oil news is a daily diet in the papers. It is not like it is a big secret that everyone except posters on this site are completely unaware of? There is just no concensus as to when and how it will play out, 'in reality', of course.
National Petroleum Council hides the hard truths about energy instead of facing them

So you that are so grounded in reality. Let us read your predictions in black & white here? What are your solutions? Tell us how we are going to transition to a fossil free future? By cutting back money supply?

First of all that 'comment' alone shows you do not even know where we are much less where we are going? Money supply is not something you can 'arbitrarily' cut back on. Money supply is a function of demand for money and credit as controlled by interest rates set by the Federal Reserve. You raise the cost of money and borrowing and you reduce demand. You cannot simply reduce money supply.

Secondly, demand for money and credit is global. So you can hike US interest rates to 20%, but if investors can still borrow freely at 1% in yen then you have done zero to reduce potential money supply.

Yeesh, I read ill-informed comments all day long here. Posters just expect to be able to say anything, so long as its populist and plays to the crowd. Don't worry if it makes sense. Decoupled from reality indeed.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby Tanada » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 06:44:56

Mr. Bill,

IMO which you obviously disagree with, fiat money IS THE PROBLEM not the solution.

Fiat money is completly arbitrary and its value changes on whims or market forces based against other fiat currencies if you prefer.

It is all just a big game they are playing with other peoples lives and I am sick of it, and if I knew a way to fix it I would be doing everything I could to accomplish the repairs.

Complaining that some of us don't beleive fiat money is a great thing is a really weird response, but hey whatever makes you happy. I come here to vent so I can keep up the charade of a normal life with my family friends and fellow members of society while the current system lasts.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 06:54:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '
')The question remains. Is this a cynical or malicious attempt by the federal reserve to flush our economy down the toilet? Or are economists as really decoupled from reality as many think? "Hey Ben, oil sure is getting expensive." "I know Alan, but we use dollars to buy oil, so let's just make some more dollars." "Brilliant, Ben!."

That is probably true, but sad state of affairs.

Most of economists are decoupled from reality.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 08:47:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', '
')The question remains. Is this a cynical or malicious attempt by the federal reserve to flush our economy down the toilet? Or are economists as really decoupled from reality as many think? "Hey Ben, oil sure is getting expensive." "I know Alan, but we use dollars to buy oil, so let's just make some more dollars." "Brilliant, Ben!."

That is probably true, but sad state of affairs.

Most of economists are decoupled from reality.


And the report written assumedly by economists and/or government employees goes on...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he potential for disruptions in key oil-producing regions of the world, such as the Middle East, and the yearly threat of hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico have also exerted upward pressure on oil prices. These conditions have renewed interest in a long-standing question: Will oil supply continue to expand to meet growing demand, or will we soon reach a maximum possible level of production—a peak—beyond which oil supply can only decline?


Source: Peak Oil Production

Leading me once again to ask, what are your long-range production and price forecasts for world crude supply and global transport fuel demand?

Are they significantly different from IEA/OPEC projections? How did you arrive at your 'real' numbers? Do they bring peak oil forward or back from 'the most pessimistic forecasts' (i.e. oil production peaked in 2005 already)? Are you an oil geologist or a petroleum engineer?

And what do you suggest governments do to mitigate the effects of supply interuptions from global demand outstripping world supply? Do you also think that cutting USD money supply is an appropriate long-term response to post peak oil depletion, which is a geological problem equivalent to a glass half-empty?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 09:07:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', 'M')r. Bill,

IMO which you obviously disagree with, fiat money IS THE PROBLEM not the solution.

Fiat money is completly arbitrary and its value changes on whims or market forces based against other fiat currencies if you prefer.

It is all just a big game they are playing with other peoples lives and I am sick of it, and if I knew a way to fix it I would be doing everything I could to accomplish the repairs.

Complaining that some of us don't beleive fiat money is a great thing is a really weird response, but hey whatever makes you happy. I come here to vent so I can keep up the charade of a normal life with my family friends and fellow members of society while the current system lasts.


Obviously, IMHO (I mean if its not my opinion then who's?), FIAT money is not THE PROBLEM or even one of many.

You want the USD to appreciate? It is all in the CBs hands. Just say the word. They hike short-term money rates to 20%. There is a stampede into long-bonds. The real economy is choked for funding. The consumer hangs himself with his debt-induced rope. Foreigners bid up the value of the USD by selling euro, yen or yuan to buy US treasuries 'for the yield pick-up' and betting that the USD will appreciate. Sound familiar?

There is only one right interest rate policy for a country and it is not fixed. Looking for a neutral rate of interest rates based on inflation, so that they are not overly restrictive or overly stimulative, is the Holy Grail of central banks. Heck, sending an economy into recession is the easy part.

Ditto for your exchange rate, but even harder because then you have to consider everyone else's exchange rate vis a vie your own. Which is why most central banks do not target exchange rates per se. Unless, of course, it is to manipulate them to their own short-term advantage.

Where does it say that the interest rate or exchange rate have to have an absolute value? That would be highly impractical given that 'a million variables' in the 'real economy' that mere economists are out of touch with that affect both contraction and expansion in the economy as well as the country's external competitiveness as measured for example by labor productivity.

Exactly how are 'other' countries supposed to integrate themselves into the global economy, so that they can for example sell the US the energy it needs or China the copper it needs without trade based on comparative advantage?

As soon as you have trade based on comparative advantage you have the need for floating exchange rates to keep the balance. Trade imbalances happen because of fixed or pegged exchange rates, not free floating exchange rates. The cost of capital or money not only controls domestic inflation, but is the risk premium countries pay to sell its debt if it needs to import capital.

You can vent all you want. You say economists are detatched from reality. I say consumers are. The problem is that you want easy, pat answers to complex problems. And there are none.

While you keep up the charade of a normal life with your family friends and fellow members of society while the current system lasts someone is fooling around with your future, so it behooves you to understand how and why? Thanks.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 09:51:49

Tanada wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')iat money is completly arbitrary and its value changes on whims or market forces based against other fiat currencies if you prefer.


Sorry, I am not trying to pick on you per se, but pick apart arguments like these that I read everyday. Feel free to disagree with me. Everyone else does.

Do you work in a mine? Do you work in the energy industry? I am just curious because if you do not then why do you expect to be paid in gold or energy credits for your labor?

If you merely work in the service sector or produce products not directly related to supplying miners and oil workers with the tools they need to extract more gold and energy from the ground then why in Heaven's name would you be expected to be paid in a 'hard currency' backed by those other people's 'real labor' as opposed to your secondary, and less important, contribution?

I mean if a currency backed by ones and zeros is worthless then what does that say about computer programmers and anyone else that produces such worthless labor? They should be paid in worthless zeros and ones if that is all they produce.

The value of a FIAT currency is backed by the overall credit worthiness of a country the same as a corporate bond or a company's share price is based on the company's financial health and future prospects. They are also not fixed in absolute value. They can appreciate overtime through good stewardship or they can plunge in value due to irresponsible borrowing or poor investment decisions.

But gold or energy is also not constant in value either. It also varies by supply and demand as well as general price inflation or the cost of other goods & services like food, clothing and shelter.

It seems highly naive to me to assume that a currency backed by all the assets of a country, plus its ability to tax its citizens both now and in the future, is of less value than the price of a fixed supply of gold? If so, then the Sharpe Ratio is wrong. You really should invest by putting all your eggs in one basket.

To be sure governments have abused their sovereignage, but mainly to give their electorate all those goodies they demanded like pensions they have never really paid for, but want anyway. As well as medical insurance that is not really insurance, but a taxpayer give away. Or even that those taxpayers even paid for all that they consumed, but passed along the remaining costs to foreign creditors and/or unborne generations of taxpayers.

You can feel pretty crummy about your government mortgaging your future, but your generation is mortgaging your children's future as well. They will pay for your debts and deficits to keep your lifestyle going through inflation and/or lower living standards. Which is worse, eh?

Why is it that people assume what they do adds value, but what others produce is less valuable? If we accept the premise that money supply, via a fiat currency, artificially creates economic growth versus 'real output' then should we not also assume that in its absense that many of you here would be unemployed and not happily earning your current salary paid in good old gold backed notes, but everything else would be cheaper?

It seems to me that many of you are disconnected from reality, and your true place in society or value to society? But that's just my opinon! ; - )
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 10:14:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '
')That is probably true, but sad state of affairs.

Most of economists are decoupled from reality.


Leading me once again to ask, what are your long-range production and price forecasts for world crude supply and global transport fuel demand?

Only fool may undertake that task.
Too many variables.
*If* things are kept as close to business as usual, as possible, I would bet on about $250 per barrel within five years from now on.
However if US decided to inflate its way out of debt it could be $ few millions...or trillions...
Demand and supply will always get balanced, albeit a lot of peoples will be extremely unhappy with an outcome of such balancing.
They will be "balanced out" of jobs etc.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re you an oil geologist or a petroleum engineer?

No, but I read their opinions from time to time.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd what do you suggest governments do to mitigate the effects of supply interuptions from global demand outstripping world supply? Do you also think that cutting USD money supply is an appropriate long-term response to post peak oil depletion, which is a geological problem equivalent to a glass half-empty?

They can do noting at all to mitigate, except of rationing perhaps.
As long as we are operating within current economic model, nothing can be done to mitigate in long term.
Any conservation attempts will be defeated by Jevon's paradox.
That is why our economy must crash at some point.

Our economy is a flawed method.
It requires infinite world and infinite exponential growth of population in addition to many other infinities to work.
That is impossible but majority of economists are taking those infinities for granted.
That is why they are decoupled from reality.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby mmasters » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 12:59:21

Fiat is a BIG part of the problem.

With wealth remaining constant and all fiat currencies naturally depreciating towards zero value, fiat serves as a rigged transfer mechanism for wealth. The fiat's mechanism of transfer is by way of inflation which banks, corporations, governments, central banks and wealthy groups control or influence. Additionally, the rising cost of oil and food substanically adds to fiat's inherent inflation making it an even greater wealth transfer mechanism.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby seldom_seen » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 15:09:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'B')lah, blah, blah. More of the same 'blame the economists' and 'policy makers' type posts we see every day on peak oil dot com.

Blah, blah, blah aside. Do you have any comments specific to my post? Do you disagree that the rise in monetary inflation is taking a bad situation and making it worse? If not, why the concealment of M3 data and reporting of silly inflation numbers by excluding food & energy? Is the fed doing this out of deceit, or desperation? To try and look like they have control of an uncontrollable situation?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'S')o you that are so grounded in reality. Let us read your predictions in black & white here? What are your solutions? Tell us how we are going to transition to a fossil free future?

We will not transition to a fossil free future without pain, disruption and dislocation of our current way of life. It's just not in the cards.

That said, I have many suggestions that would help us along the way. I'd be happy to list them if you'd like to know.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby CrudeAwakening » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 19:37:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', ' ')Money supply is not something you can 'arbitrarily' cut back on. Money supply is a function of demand for money and credit as controlled by interest rates set by the Federal Reserve. You raise the cost of money and borrowing and you reduce demand. You cannot simply reduce money supply.

MrBill, I don't follow this. What happens when the central bank uses open market operations to sell bonds to the general public or commercial banks?
"Who knows what the Second Law of Thermodynamics will be like in a hundred years?" - Economist speaking during planning for World Population Conference in early 1970s
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: peak oil & inflation: burning the candle at both end

Unread postby cube » Mon 23 Jul 2007, 20:54:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'B')lah, blah, blah. More of the same 'blame the economists' and 'policy makers' type posts we see every day on peak oil dot com.
As much as I despise all the financial shenanigans that go on in this world even I have to admit that the core root of the problem comes from the public...NOT the economists. We have out of control inflation because the public wants it. They don't have the discipline to live within their means:
1) The public likes cheap credit
2) The public is NOT serious about balancing the federal budget
3) Americans are NOT serious about closing the gap on their trade deficit.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'I') read far fewer posts about suggestions on how to solve post peak oil depletion or mitigate its economic effects?
Does that mean you don't like "cube" die-off solution? Look on the bright side, there will be no energy shortage once 90% of the population dies-off. :twisted:
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron